Is there any interest in migrating SANE's CVS to a newer revision control
system?
Subversion would be an improvement for its repository-wide revision
numbers.
A DVCS such as git would be even more interesting, given the apparent
number of people who could contribute code and/or scanner test
-6130 carries the same high level of sane
fujitsu-backend compatibility as the fi-5120c?
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:10:04 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
works perfectly with sane cvs, poorly with 1.0.19. debian's latest 1.0.19
deb has a patch that gives basic support.
sane cvs also enables every esoteric option i could find, including the
endorser (if you get one).
Is there a source
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:20:04 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:08 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
well, i've just committed a patch to fix this, but please test, as i
never saw the error message in the first place...
Does anyone have a good procedure
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:51:50 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Jeff Kowalczyk jtk at yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
$ scanimage -d epjitsu
(massive ansi terminal spew)
*** glibc detected *** scanimage: double free or corruption (!prev):
0x08053ca0 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/tls
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:10:51 +0200, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
export MALLOC_CHECK_=0
If possible, use valgrind -v scanimage -d epjitsu to generate the
backtrace, it will be more informative.
gdb terminal spew hit a magic ansi sequence that made the text unreadable.
If you can suggest a command
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:08 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
well, i've just committed a patch to fix this, but please test, as i
never saw the error message in the first place...
Does anyone have a good procedure for patching and rebuilding
released ubuntu .debs to test upstream changes? Or a way
Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
The whole picture isn't so bright - as for now, this native Win32
version is limited only to dll, net backends and scanimage binary.
Even so, this is a valuable capability when mature. I'm imagining the
departmental linux-connected scanner which returns image data to the
Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
Last week I've committed native Win32 version of SANE. It's available
for checkout at cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane checkout
experimental/sane-backends-win32. Any feedback will be greatly
appreciated.
If you have any way to provide snapshot builds from time to time,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:32:24 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
which kernel did you use? I've currently checked that on a SuSE10,
kernel 2.6.13 and turned on CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND - no problems so far.
I tried to put the LiDE20 into suspend - no problems. Next thing
I need to check is my laptop,
I'm starting to look more closely at scanner troubleshooting issues for
deployment. Is there a utility or command parameter that will instruct a
scanner to park the head back in the home position and generally reset
itself to a safe/ready state?
My everyday flatbed scanner ((vendor=0x04a9
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
My everyday flatbed scanner ((vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220d
[CanoScan], chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:002:002) got out of sorts today.
The scan head wasn't returned to the home position (it is now), but
XSane scans now just return solid black data.
I see that it's
m. allan noah wrote:
the kodak i30 and i40 are rebadged avision av200's, and i think
visioneer sells one too. i had a kodak i40 here for awhile, it works ok
with sane, but there were some 'pausing' or timeout issues when you
first start scanning, even with the latest version of rene's avision
I'm looking for current recommendations for a fast ADF scanner with
reliable paper handling and stable SANE driver support for the desired
modes accessed via python PIL/Sane, scanadf, scanner access across
network, etc.
In the past (I ask every year or so, haven't bought yet) m. allan noah and
I need to scan visitors' plastic/laminate identification cards. The scans
are to be initiated via web app, signalling a headless SANE linux server
to scan via scanadf, network scanning, python PIL/sane, etc.
Has anyone got any vendor and model recommendations for a specialised USB
card scanner
I neglected to add my libusb-0.1.12 information to the previous long
configuration description, which apparently directly affects the udev
device node mapping, permissions, etc.
I also found this forum comment:
What *should* happen is that the udev rules in
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules get
Please forgive the very long post, but I wanted to get some specifics
recommended actions to restore access to my Canon LIDE20 scanner, which
has been inaccessible roughly since the upgrade to sane-backends-1.0.17.
My scanner problems seemed to closely match reports those of users with
Michael Roitzsch wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Looking through the archives I see a number of postings on developing
a driver for the Canon Canoscan LiDE 500F. How far did you get?
Unfortunately, I have not even got started, since I have very little
time and some other projects in need
Gerald Murray wrote:
Quoting Jeff Shrowder shrow...@uniting.com.au:
Looking through the archives I discovered a series of exchanges in
December about support for the 500F. What is the current situation? I'm
not so sure I can help with developing that support (I'm no
programmer) but I am
help?
I haven't bought one of these scanners yet - but I'd like to when my
present 5 year old, and much worked, mustek finally croaks - which may
not be all that far away :-)
Jeff Shrowder
I've still not purchased a fast ADF scanner for home-office use. I was
hoping someone might have tried a recent model of a certain class that was
working well for them under sane.
interface: USB-2.0
ADF: 50 sheet or larger,
config: upright, flatbed not desired
speed: = 15 ppm @ 300 dpi 1-bit,
Of course I meant fi-4120C2.
And does anyone have any (sane) experience with the newer fi-5120C? Thanks.
http://www.fcpa.fujitsu.com/products/scanners/fi-5120C/specifications.html
Horst Herb wrote:
interface: USB-2.0
ADF: 50 sheet or larger,
config: upright, flatbed not desired
speed: = 15 ?ppm @ 300 dpi 1-bit,
? ? ? ? ? 10 ?ppm @ 300 dpi 256-grayscale,
? ? ? ? ? 25+ ppm @ 150 dpi 1-bit
intangibles: sane support, good reliability reputation
(esp ADF)
price range:
I want to access a scanner from a DOC C program , can I use SANE to do
this?
Has anyone had occasion to use the following Fujitsu scanner with the current
SANE fujitsu back-end?
Fujitsu Fi-5110EOX2 600 x 600dpi USB Interface Sheet Fed/Document Fed Scanner
I'd been planning on a Fujitsu Fi-4120C2, which costs more than twice as much.
I presume that despite similar
m. allan noah wrote:
i only know fujitsu models, so i am sure there are others, but the
fi-4120C2 is pretty fast, and the sane support is ok for binary and
grayscale.
Thanks for the reply. The fujitsu models were my leading candidates.
Thanks for your work on the SANE support for these.
The
Before I settle on the Fujitsu fi-4120C2, would the author of the AV220
support (René Rebe) care to weigh in on how well the Kodak i60 and i80
have been working with his avision SANE driver? (Or anyone that has used
the i60 or i80 with SANE, for that matter)
- 1bit and grayscale
- 300dpi
- USB
m. allan noah wrote:
the scanner speed on the 4120C was limited by the speed of the bus. to
be honest, i only go up to 200dpi, so i have not tested the speed of the
4120C2 at higher resolutions.
I just checked with Fujitsu's online support (should have done that
first), and they stated that
I'm looking for an ADF-capable scanner to do fast scanning. Has anyone got
recommendations for models that meet most of the following criteria?
- 1-bit and greyscale modes are the only ones that matter here
- 300 dpi, and able to do 300dpi at high speed
- ADF (or ADF option) that has good
Did you reboot or at least rmmod/modprobe your scsi card beore changing
the scanner's scsi id?
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:04 +0800, Ted Parks wrote:
Checking the place in the SCSI chain indicated on the small dial on my
ScanJet 4C, I discovered the scanner was set on 7. I changed it to 0 and 1,
/libraries might have been involved.
This is a Gentoo x86 machine, kernel 2.6.8-gentoo-r3. SCSI card is an
Initio INI-940.
Jeff
document feed. Needs to be capable of color and
black white scanning, preferably at 2400 dpi, but will
accept 1200. Also, I have capability of USB (1.1 or 2.0)
and Bluetooth, either interface works.
Any recommendations?
jeff
in terminal, I now get the error scanimage: no SANE devices found
What would be the steps to fix it? This is listed as a supported
scanner. Thanks,
Jeff Weinfeld
Havard,
Please take a look at a web page I wrote on how to install the
Perfection 1670, which includes some troubleshooting hints. Let me know
what the problem was and how you fixed it and I will include those
comments in the next draft of the page.
Sincerely yours,
Jeff Silverman
m. allan noah wrote:
the 4120/4220 on the other hand, are absolutely wonderful, heavy, small,
welbuilt machines, with excellent paper feeds, even for heavy stock. we
now have quite a few of them in the field, each scanning a few hundred
sheets per day, and are quite happy with the
Has your organization had any experience with the 4530C? This small monster has
great specs (35-47ppm, 100-sheet large-format ADF, USB 2.0), although its sure
to cost well over two kilobucks even if you found a discount reseller. If the
quality is an extrapolation of what you've found in the
After a long while of doing without, I may suddenly need a good scanner for a
collection of documents. I would like to find something with the following
characteristics, if anyone has tried a model that fits the bill.
a) Linux and SANE compatibility exists today. Limited feature support OK.
b)
as 603x610 pixels at 900 DPI. I also tried
scanning in gray scale at more than 900 DPI and it appears that the image is
clipped at the right boundary.
I can live with this, but, I'd like to help fix it. Any advice?
Many thanks,
Jeff
/~jeffs/epson1670andFedora.html page.
The box the scanner came in says that the resolution can go to
1600x3200 DPI but xsane doesn't seem to believe that.
Many thanks,
Jeff Silverman
jeff @ commercialventvac . com
Hello,
I am having some issues getting a EpsonCX5200 to be seen and used by
xscanimage.
Printing works flawlessly. xscanimage doesnt find any scanners neither
does sane-find-scanner.
I have tried powering it off and on and rebooting this and that multiple
command line strings to try to force
So far
sane-find-scanner output shows it detecting the scanner
and the epson.conf has one line that is uncommented
usb /dev/usb/scanner0
jeff@humdinger:~$ sudo sane-find-scanner -v -v
--snip--
searching for USB scanners:
checking /dev/usb/scanner... failed to open (Invalid argument
Yup
jeff@humdinger:~$ ls -al /dev/usb/scanner0
crw-rw-rw-1 root root 180, 48 Mar 25 2001 /dev/usb/scanner0
Jeff
gerard klaver wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 11:11, Jeff Courtade wrote:
So far
sane-find-scanner output shows it detecting the scanner
and the epson.conf has
jeff@humdinger:~$ cat /etc/sane.d/dll.conf |grep -v \#
net
epson
Thankyou BTW
Jeff
gerard klaver wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 12:05, Jeff Courtade wrote:
Yup
jeff@humdinger:~$ ls -al /dev/usb/scanner0
crw-rw-rw-1 root root 180, 48 Mar 25 2001 /dev/usb/scanner0
Jeff
Yes it does detect it twice
When I set the debug I do not get any additional info
jeff@humdinger:~$ export SANE_DEBUG_EPSON=255
jeff@humdinger:~$ sane-find-scanner
Jeff Courtade
# No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make
sure that
# you have loaded a SCSI
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:40:22PM -0400, Jeff Courtade wrote:
When running this with the official distribution there was no additional
output from scanimage -L
with
export SANE_DEBUG_EPSON=255 set.
This means the epson backend was not loaded
the
errors.
They were in /etc/sane.d at build time though.
Thanx so much. Have a nice night.
Jeff Courtade
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
Isn't it amazing how things just resolve themselves, even when I'm not
around :-) Thanks to Henning for
taking care of this.
The problem you had (no debug
So i think i figured out that the reason for this error is because
i did not have usbdev filesystem turned on in my kernel. It seems to be
working so far.
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 12:34, Jeff Johnson wrote:
greetingss
I am getting these messages on the console with sane frontends
Most of the front ends i have seen so far (XSane, XScanimage, Iscan...)
Either only have 8 or 16 bit as an option for color depth or have no
selection at all. I wonder is there anything i need to do in order to
scan above 16 bit?
btw: scanner=epson 1650 photo
Thanks
-jeff
greetingss
I am getting these messages on the console with sane frontends and not
sure what the problem might be
scanner is epson 1650 Photo.
any ideas are appreciated.
Thanks,
jeff
[epson] sane_open(/dev/usb/scanner0)
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 40 @
[epson
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
