Peter Kirchgessner peter at kirchgessner.net wrote:
I have no problem if the usleep(1000) is added. If it helps, it's
ok. For a typical scan about 200 inquiries are done. So setting up the
scanner is slowed down by 0.2 seconds in total. That is far less than
the scan will need.
I don't know
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Jim Meyering jim at meyering.net wrote:
Peter Kirchgessner peter at kirchgessner.net wrote:
I have no problem if the usleep(1000) is added. If it helps, it's
ok. For a typical scan about 200 inquiries are done. So setting up the
scanner is slowed down by
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Jim Meyering jim at meyering.net wrote:
Peter Kirchgessner peter at kirchgessner.net wrote:
I have no problem if the usleep(1000) is added. If it helps, it's
ok. For a typical scan about 200 inquiries are done. So
I have no problem if the usleep(1000) is added. If it helps, it's ok.
For a typical scan about 200 inquiries are done. So setting up the
scanner is slowed down by 0.2 seconds in total. That is far less than
the scan will need.
I don't know if it is possible with libusb to check if an answer of
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sane-debug-output.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4063 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080317/c1a8729b/attachment.obj
