[sane-devel] [Patch] Support for Samsung SCX-3400

2013-11-21 Thread RĂ©mi Vanicat
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de writes: Hi, On 07/05/2013 09:29 PM, ABC wrote: SCX-3400 model is already in the upstream. But it is marked as untested. If it's actually tested please report. And, AFAIK libsane.rules is don't need to be edited because it is

[sane-devel] [Patch] Support for Samsung SCX-3400

2013-07-06 Thread ABC
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, SCX-3400 model is already in the upstream. But it is marked as untested. If it's actually tested please report. And, AFAIK libsane.rules is don't need to be edited because it is autogenerated (somebody correct me if I'm wrong). Thanks, -abc On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at

[sane-devel] [Patch] Support for Samsung SCX-3400

2013-07-05 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello, we're currently tidying up the SANE backend in Debian and we just stumbled across this user report [1]: # Samsung SCX-3400 ATTRS{idVendor}==04e8, ATTRS{idProduct}==344f, ENV{libsane_matched}=yes to /lib/60-libsane.rules and #Samsung SCX-3400 usb 0x04e8 0x344f to

[sane-devel] [Patch] Support for Samsung SCX-3400

2013-07-05 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi, On 07/05/2013 09:29 PM, ABC wrote: SCX-3400 model is already in the upstream. But it is marked as untested. If it's actually tested please report. And, AFAIK libsane.rules is don't need to be edited because it is autogenerated (somebody correct me if I'm wrong). I'll add Remi in the CC