Hi Johannes,
Johannes Meixner writes (among other things):
> On Oct 28 20:18 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
>> Johannes Meixner writes:
> ...
>>> RFC for an additional goal for sane-backends-1.0.26:
>>>
>>> - switch to group "lp" instead of "scanner"
> ...
>> I think it best to leave this to
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 01:57:12PM +0100, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> I will report my experience when I have droped support
> for parallel port scanners in openSUSE Tumbleweed.
Folks have been boasting old hardware (and _specifically_
scanner) support as a distinct advantage over Windows, FWIW.
and keep support for them for those who still use
them (still got 2 of them).
See what I had written here:
--
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:43:17 +0200 (CEST)
...
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] 1.0.25 is out, now what?
.
.
.
My current plan how
On 28/10/2015 12:18, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Sorry for the belated response.
Johannes Meixner writes:
Hello Olaf,
first and foremost many thanks for all your
"SANE Project Janitor" work.
On Oct 19 22:20 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
... unofficial ... goals for sane-backends-1.0.26.
Hello
On Oct 28 20:18 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
Johannes Meixner writes:
...
Suggestion for an additional goal for sane-backends-1.0.26:
- drop support for parallel port scanners
Low priority for 1.0.26 at best.
Also for me this is low priority because I have zero
issue reports
Sorry for the belated response.
Johannes Meixner writes:
> Hello Olaf,
>
> first and foremost many thanks for all your
> "SANE Project Janitor" work.
>
> On Oct 19 22:20 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
>>> ... unofficial ... goals for sane-backends-1.0.26.
>> Feedback and suggestions are
Hi Johannes,
Johannes Meixner writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Oct 21 21:32 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
>> Alessandro Zummo writes:
>>> There's probably still some bug in the usb code. I have
>>> intermittent results with some scanners on usb2
>>> and with others on usb3. switching among the two
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:01:25 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> I'm not thinking about just adding a frame type. There are a number of
> things that can be improved (progress indication, batch scanning among
> others). If we are to make changes, we may as well address
Sorry for the late follow-up.
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:32:37 +0900
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> [...]
>> API change. Given the schedule for 1.0.26, I don't think that is doable
>> within that time frame. If we are going to change the API,
Hi Devs,
Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
> [...]
>
> One of the things that I think contributed to the long period between
> releases is the lack of a milestone, plan and/or schedule. Alioth does
> not seem to have any kind of functionality that can help with that so I
> have set up a milestone[1] at
Hello,
On Oct 21 21:32 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
Alessandro Zummo writes:
There's probably still some bug in the usb code. I have
intermittent results with some scanners on usb2
and with others on usb3. switching among the two usb
standards solves them all.
I'm curious about USB
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:20:25 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Adding support for new devices, improving functionality for devices that
> are already supported and fixing bugs will be part of 1.0.26 as well but
> I think that that goes without saying. Said it anyway and
Hello Olaf,
first and foremost many thanks for all your
"SANE Project Janitor" work.
On Oct 19 22:20 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt):
... unofficial ... goals for sane-backends-1.0.26.
- modernize the autofoo bits
- fix all compiler warnings
- bump language level to C99
- default to
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:20:25 +0900
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> Adding support for new devices, improving functionality for devices that
>> are already supported and fixing bugs will be part of 1.0.26 as well but
>> I think that that goes
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:32:37 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> >
> don't have direct access to a device. Maybe we could think about how to
> approach manufacturers to get access to specs and/or devices (and under
> what conditions because we still want to be able to
Hi Devs,
It took two years before 1.0.25 saw the light of day but it has been out
for two weeks now. Are we going to wait another two years for 1.0.26?
I sincerely hope not.
One of the things that I think contributed to the long period between
releases is the lack of a milestone, plan and/or
16 matches
Mail list logo