[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Mark Farnell
Brother has already licensed their brother sane backend code to GPL, the backends are known as brscan1, brscan2 and brscan3: http://solutions.brother.com/linux/en_us/download_src.html brscan and brscan2 code:

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
Mark Farnell mark.farnell at gmail.com wrote: Hi, Brother has already licensed their brother sane backend code to GPL, the backends are known as brscan1, brscan2 and brscan3: GPL isn't enough, we need GPL + SANE exception. brscan and brscan2 code:

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Mark Farnell
So should sane talk to Brother about the requirements for a genuine GPL license and ask them to release all the source code? We should tell them the we need GPL + SANE exception. Mark On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Julien BLACHEjb at jblache.org wrote: Mark Farnell mark.farnell at gmail.com

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
Mark Farnell mark.farnell at gmail.com wrote: So should sane talk to Brother about the requirements for a genuine GPL license and ask them to release all the source code? We should tell them the we need GPL + SANE exception. The code would probably need a rewrite anyway before we can add it

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:15:23 +0200 Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote: GPL isn't enough, we need GPL + SANE exception. LICENSE says: Note that not all of the backends apply the exception and that some have additional licensing constraints. so GPL only should be fine. In

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote: btw, which software is actually using the exception? I believe Vuescan does, for parts of sanei. JB. -- Julien BLACHE http://www.jblache.org jb at jblache.org GPG KeyID

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Mark Farnell
Excuse me... Can you have a good look AGAIN at the sources? Both packages contain a good amount of C codes under brscan/backend_src lib and sanei Are these code sufficient for us to build a backend for sane-backend? On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Julien BLACHEjb at jblache.org wrote:

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
Mark Farnell mark.farnell at gmail.com wrote: Both packages contain a good amount of C codes under brscan/backend_src lib and sanei Are these code sufficient for us to build a backend for sane-backend? No. JB. -- Julien BLACHE http://www.jblache.org jb

[sane-devel] Brother has already provided source code for brother scanner backends, should they go to sane-backends?

2009-07-04 Thread m. allan noah
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Mark Farnellmark.farnell at gmail.com wrote: Excuse me... Can you have a good look AGAIN at the sources? Both packages contain a good amount of C codes under brscan/backend_src ? lib and sanei Are these code sufficient for us to build a backend for