Hello
I checked hpljm1005.c with your patched 'sane_open' - thich work correct.
Wait the AUTHOR's approval?
Regards, tropos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Error-in-HP-LaserJet-M1005-Backend-tp15127315p15182770.html
Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at
no, the author seems a little slow to respond, so i have committed this fix now.
allan
On 1/30/08, tropos tropos at rambler.ru wrote:
Hello
I checked hpljm1005.c with your patched 'sane_open' - thich work correct.
Wait the AUTHOR's approval?
Regards, tropos
--
View this message in
Le mercredi 30 janvier 2008, m. allan noah a ?crit?:
no, the author seems a little slow to respond, so i have committed this fix
now.
Sorry about that, I'm quite busy thoses times (End of my master project,
getting a new job etc ...).
Thank you for the fix, it of course has my approval.
Yes- the standard says that the backend should not assume that
sane_get_devices will be called before sane_open. a better fix might
be to check for this condition, could you try this instead?
SANE_Status
sane_open (SANE_String_Const name, SANE_Handle * h)
{
struct device_s *dev;
int ret;
Hello
Commands:
scanimage -d hpljm1005:libusb:1:5
or
scanimage -d net:host:hpljm1005:libusb:1:5
return error:
...open... invalid argument
Help such dirty workarround:
hpljm1005.c on current sane CVS:
SANE_Status
sane_init (SANE_Int * version_code,
SANE_Auth_Callback
