Ren? Rebe wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2007 13:30:13 Till Kamppeter wrote:
Ren? Rebe wrote:
Hase the SANE2 development actually started? What are the limitations of
Don't think so.
[...]
I think SANE 1 is pretty fine and in too wide use to abondone. Features
of new scanners, such as JPEG and
Till Kamppeter till.kamppeter at gmail.com writes:
Any news on SANE and LSB?
Oops, I had something stuck in my drafts ...
Till Kamppeter wrote:
Till Kamppeter wrote:
Does the lsb project expect some testing code to be written?
What tests would be needed, or expected, if any?
What we need
Any news on SANE and LSB?
Till
Till Kamppeter wrote:
Till Kamppeter wrote:
Does the lsb project expect some testing code to be written?
What tests would be needed, or expected, if any?
What we need is two interfaces of SANE, once the frontend/library
interface, so that one can have
Gerald Murray wrote:
Ren? Rebe wrote:
I take a look into what is necessary to get SANE into the LSB over
the weekend.
Did you already find out something?
Hi Till,
I took a quick look. It looks like the lsb project wants headers
--stripped of all comments and programmer remarks;
the
Till Kamppeter wrote:
Does the lsb project expect some testing code to be written?
What tests would be needed, or expected, if any?
What we need is two interfaces of SANE, once the frontend/library
interface, so that one can have scanning functionality in LSB-packaged
applications, and
Ren? Rebe wrote:
I take a look into what is necessary to get SANE into the LSB over
the weekend.
Did you already find out something?
Till
Ren? Rebe wrote:
I take a look into what is necessary to get SANE into the LSB over
the weekend.
Did you already find out something?
Hi Till,
I took a quick look. It looks like the lsb project wants headers
--stripped of all comments and programmer remarks;
the library would be empty
Hi,
one important point which prevented from packaging HP's HPLIP was that
it contains a SANE driver for the scanners in HP's multi-function
devices and SANE is neither in the LSB nor in the LSB DDK. Also other
printer manufacturers, like Epson or Brother could run into this problem.
I
Ren? Rebe wrote:
SANE developers, WDYT about SANE getting into the LSB? Are you willing
to provide API documentation and testing procedures?
Some of us (read including me) are interested in this standardization
efford, while others plan to reinvent the SANE wheel with a 100%
incompatible
On Friday 22 June 2007 12:01:11 Till Kamppeter wrote:
Ren? Rebe wrote:
SANE developers, WDYT about SANE getting into the LSB? Are you willing
to provide API documentation and testing procedures?
Some of us (read including me) are interested in this standardization
efford, while others
Ren? Rebe wrote:
Hase the SANE2 development actually started? What are the limitations of
Don't think so.
[...]
I think SANE 1 is pretty fine and in too wide use to abondone. Features
of new scanners, such as JPEG and infrared frames can easily be added
without breaking anything, just new
On Friday 22 June 2007 13:30:13 Till Kamppeter wrote:
Ren? Rebe wrote:
Hase the SANE2 development actually started? What are the limitations of
Don't think so.
[...]
I think SANE 1 is pretty fine and in too wide use to abondone. Features
of new scanners, such as JPEG and infrared
Ren? Rebe wrote:
Yes, this is my talking for a long time. Unfortunatly some SANE
developers lobby for the SANE2 from scratch.
I take a look into what is necessary to get SANE into the LSB over
the weekend.
To see what is required visit the LSB developer network (the parts for
application
13 matches
Mail list logo
