New with sane-backends 1.0.21, released 2010-04-25:
* New backends: kodak (Kodak i18xx), kvs1025 (Panasonic KV-S10xx),
p5 (Primax PagePartner)
* 224 more scanner models supported.
* Many backends updated.
* Improved compilation on uncommon platforms.
* More consistent option naming.
* Scanimage
Hi,
New with sane-backends 1.0.21, released 2010-04-25:
* New backends: kodak (Kodak i18xx), kvs1025 (Panasonic KV-S10xx),
p5 (Primax PagePartner)
* 224 more scanner models supported.
* Many backends updated.
* Improved compilation on uncommon platforms.
* More consistent option naming.
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
[on-list, this time...]
New with sane-backends 1.0.21, released 2010-04-25:
I've just pushed a RELEASE_1_0_21 tag, corresponding to commit
7b0a6ecd049088717156d95c2a0d5037d9ec1427.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
Thanks. I did that, but had a fight with git, and ended up grabbing a
few format-patch files and reapplying to a new tree to commit. I guess
tags dont go in patches.
allan
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
strange- i built the tarball prior to release, and it did not
complain. I'll work up a patch.
allan
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Simon Matter simon.matter at invoca.ch wrote:
Hi,
New with sane-backends 1.0.21, released 2010-04-25:
* New backends: kodak (Kodak i18xx), kvs1025 (Panasonic
strange- i built the tarball prior to release, and it did not
complain. I'll work up a patch.
Yes, the build doesn't complain and finishes successfully but it just ends
up without any .mo files built. That's where the rpmbuild failed, because
it expects the .mo files.
Simon
allan
On Mon,
Yes- the new Makefile is coded such that it is a no-op if those files
are missing, hence, no error message. Unfortunately, I dont think it
is possible to add more download files to an existing release on
alioth. Perhaps this is 1.0.21b :)
allan
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Simon Matter
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. I did that, but had a fight with git, and ended up grabbing a
few format-patch files and reapplying to a new tree to commit. I guess
tags dont go in patches.
No, and you need to git push --tags to get them out the door, too :)
JB.
--
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
Yes- the new Makefile is coded such that it is a no-op if those files
are missing, hence, no error message. Unfortunately, I dont think it
is possible to add more download files to an existing release on
alioth. Perhaps this is 1.0.21b :)
Project -
