[Please CC me in all replies]
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:23 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Paul Wise pabs3 at bonedaddy.net wrote:
The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol and have it
standardised by the USB Implementers Forum, then use that to influence
the OEM scanner
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 15:28 -0800, David Poole dpoole at marvell.com wrote:
http://www.usb.org/developers/defined_class/#BaseClass06h
www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/usb_still_img10.pdf
Thanks.
When we were developing our scanners, we looked into the USB still
imaging device. The
Fran?ois Revol revol at free.fr wrote:
Hi,
There actually was a scanner/imaging device standard class defined
for
USB, and it never went anywhere.
Well, just like webcams, until finally some big player switched to
UVC,
like Apple.
My point. Except the iSight doesn't
Fran?ois Revol revol at free.fr wrote:
Hi,
My point. Except the iSight doesn't actually talk proper UVC.
Does it ?
Yep. Look at the uvc driver, you'll see the packet format for the
iSight isn't standard UVC.
Moreover the camera actually doesn't advertise itself as a UVC class
device. The
Hi all,
[Please CC me in all replies]
I've been thinking it would be cool if the SANE project didn't have to
write new scanner drivers for each and every new USB scanner that comes
out.
The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol and have it
standardised by the USB Implementers
Paul Wise pabs3 at bonedaddy.net wrote:
Hi,
The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol and have it
standardised by the USB Implementers Forum, then use that to influence
the OEM scanner manufacturers to implement it on new scanners.
There actually was a scanner/imaging device
Hi,
The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol and have it
standardised by the USB Implementers Forum, then use that to
influence
the OEM scanner manufacturers to implement it on new scanners.
There actually was a scanner/imaging device standard class defined
for
Fran?ois Revol revol at free.fr wrote:
Hi,
There actually was a scanner/imaging device standard class defined
for
USB, and it never went anywhere.
Well, just like webcams, until finally some big player switched to UVC,
like Apple.
My point. Except the iSight doesn't actually talk proper
2008/12/27 Paul Wise pabs3 at bonedaddy.net:
Hi all,
[Please CC me in all replies]
I've been thinking it would be cool if the SANE project didn't have to
write new scanner drivers for each and every new USB scanner that comes
out.
The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol
