[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2011-01-03 Thread m. allan noah
I'm not sure these new types will work on all platforms sane builds on. Of course, we've also not heard from any AIX or IRIX users in years, so I'm not sure how much of a problem that really is :) allan On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Eddy De Greef eddy_de_greef at scarlet.be wrote: On

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2011-01-02 Thread Eddy De Greef
On 01-01-11 00:49, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: I had a report that %lu might be better than %llu for the debug statements, so I would like to confirm that %llu was not a typing error? Should I use %llu or %lu for the debug statements when uint64_t is the declared type? Hi Gernot, on a 32-bit

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2011-01-01 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Nicolas Martin nicolas0martin at gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 31 d?cembre 2010 ? 14:11 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit : On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Nicolas Martin

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
Dear all, I have been involved in trying to support the Canoscan 9000F, and the testing community has grown to about 15 individuals. A few of them have programming knowledge and tonight one individual send in corrected code to handle the final hurdle: correctly aligning the sub-images in the

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Gerard Klaver gerard.klaver at xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 01:29 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: Dear all, I have been involved in trying to support the Canoscan 9000F, and the testing community has grown to about 15 individuals. A few of them

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Robert Krawitz rlk at alum.mit.edu wrote: On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:41:10 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Gerard Klaver gerard.klaver at xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 01:29 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: Dear all, I

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Nicolas Martin
Le vendredi 31 d?cembre 2010 ? 02:55 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit : On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Robert Krawitz rlk at alum.mit.edu wrote: On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:41:10 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Gerard Klaver gerard.klaver at xs4all.nl wrote:

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Nicolas Martin nicolas0martin at gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 31 d?cembre 2010 ? 02:55 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit : On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Robert Krawitz rlk at alum.mit.edu wrote: On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:41:10 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Nicolas Martin nicolas0martin at gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 31 d?cembre 2010 ? 02:55 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit : On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Robert Krawitz rlk at

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-31 Thread Nicolas Martin
Le vendredi 31 d?cembre 2010 ? 14:11 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit : On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Nicolas Martin nicolas0martin at gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 31 d?cembre 2010 ? 02:55 +0900, Gernot

[sane-devel] maximum image size for a scan for Canon pixma backend

2010-12-30 Thread Gerard Klaver
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 01:29 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: Dear all, I have been involved in trying to support the Canoscan 9000F, and the testing community has grown to about 15 individuals. A few of them have programming knowledge and tonight one individual send in corrected code to