Hi all,
On Saturday 01 March 2008 20:35:30 Oliver Rauch wrote:
Am Samstag, den 01.03.2008, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
no? mine is to tweak, yours is not to tweak.. I'd say
they are quite different :)
BTW: in every stupid comment there is a bit truth
Now I see that
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2008, 13:05 +0100 schri
If it is not for a gradual and compatible improvement of SANE, but
a significant rewrite it would make more sense to adapt an wide
deployed industrial standard such as TWAIN,
SANE and TWAIN work on different levels.
SANE is an interface between a
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2008, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Ren? Rebe:
And I also want to point out once more that during a major
rewite we'll probably loose drivers for old hardware as there
will be few people re-writing a backend for the oldest devices
most developers do not have anymore.
This is not
On Sunday 02 March 2008 13:32:17 Oliver Rauch wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2008, 13:05 +0100 schri
If it is not for a gradual and compatible improvement of SANE, but
a significant rewrite it would make more sense to adapt an wide
deployed industrial standard such as TWAIN,
SANE and
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2008, 18:14 +0100 schrieb Ren? Rebe:
Not really. TWAIN also has the DataSource, the backend driver, a
DataSourceManager multiplexing between the sources and the
applications, and the frontend applications. The architecture is
mostly the same. And yes, the data sources
Hi,
On Sunday 02 March 2008 20:39:32 Oliver Rauch wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2008, 18:14 +0100 schrieb Ren? Rebe:
Not really. TWAIN also has the DataSource, the backend driver, a
DataSourceManager multiplexing between the sources and the
applications, and the frontend applications.
On Freitag, 29. Februar 2008, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:59:06 +0100
Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote:
Now if the other developers here can declare their intentions
and the way they want to implement them, we can have a better
picture of the thing
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 13:23:47 +0100
Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote:
We now have new frame-types - that's okay - BUT all other
drawbacks we currently have in 1.x should and must be addressed
by sane 2.x
No more tweaks - compatible or not!
Well it seems that we have
Am Samstag, den 01.03.2008, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
no? mine is to tweak, yours is not to tweak.. I'd say
they are quite different :)
BTW: in every stupid comment there is a bit truth
Now I see that tweaking is your goal and so I understand why we don`t
find a conclusion. My
Does a german and an itilian understand the same thing behind
Tweaking ? ;)
?tienne.
Am Samstag, den 01.03.2008, 21:03 +0100 schrieb ?tienne Bersac:
Does a german and an itilian understand the same thing behind
Tweaking ? ;)
Don`t know what you understand behind tweaking,
I understand it as a bad, unconventional improvement
in an improper way.
Best regards
Oliver
Hi,
That's the shame with english. When will SANE switch to Esperanto ;)
Regards,
?tienne.
?tienne Bersac bersace03 at gmail.com wrote:
That's the shame with english. When will SANE switch to Esperanto ;)
Let's add that as a requirement for SANE2.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE http://www.jblache.org
jb at jblache.org GPG
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:59:06 +0100
Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote:
Now if the other developers here can declare their intentions
and the way they want to implement them, we can have a better
picture of the thing that's going on and we can see if and
how we can work
while we are discussing how to implement new features,
here are a couple of things that i'd like to see:
- a way to obtain some more info about the scanner.
I always missed a way to ask the scanner for vendor, model and
serial number. the only option available right now is to cache
them
Add some more things and we are close to sane2.
Don`t you think you already lost control about what you started?
Please take a step back and take a look at what you are doing.
Oliver
Am Donnerstag, den 28.02.2008, 23:39 +0100 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
while we are discussing how to
yes- i am now inclined to agree with you, oliver.
allan
On 2/28/08, Oliver Rauch oliver.rauch at rauch-domain.de wrote:
Add some more things and we are close to sane2.
Don`t you think you already lost control about what you started?
Please take a step back and take a look at what you are
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:49:34 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
yes- i am now inclined to agree with you, oliver.
Don`t you think you already lost control about what you started?
Please take a step back and take a look at what you are doing.
well, maybe I should declare my
18 matches
Mail list logo
