[sane-devel] segfault in sane_net_get_devicesconnecting to network saned

2010-05-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org writes: Hi, Hi, That's what you get for using a proprietary backend that isn't properly integrated in the system (udev/consolekit). So, is this just comment on the permissions issue or the the segfault -- which is the original point of this report/thread?

[sane-devel] segfault in sane_net_get_devicesconnecting to network saned

2010-05-11 Thread Julien BLACHE
Brian J. Murrell brian at interlinx.bc.ca wrote: Hi, That's what you get for using a proprietary backend that isn't properly integrated in the system (udev/consolekit). So, is this just comment on the permissions issue or the the segfault -- which is the original point of this

[sane-devel] segfault in sane_net_get_devicesconnecting to network saned

2010-05-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org writes: Hi, Hi, Did you contact Brother asking them to contribute the code to their driver to SANE? Of course I did, in the context of the printer driver. There was no point in talking about the scanner driver once they made their position on their

[sane-devel] segfault in sane_net_get_devicesconnecting to network saned

2010-05-11 Thread m. allan noah
Ok- let me first appologize if you took Julien the wrong way. You see, any program that uses sane-backends is effectively pulling the backends into it's running process, giving it all manner of options to screw things up. In the absence of source code, it can be very difficult to identify the