[sane-devel] GT68xx Backend Driver for Mustek??

2009-06-29 Thread Usagi
It looks like Meier Geinitz?s site is down where you used to be able to
download this.
Does anyone have any info?
Thank you! ^_^
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090629/b92d6ac6/attachment.htm


[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 650U not recognized except in lsusb?

2009-06-29 Thread Michael Ole Olsen
:  
Bus 004 Device 001: ID :  
Bus 003 Device 004: ID 0471:0311 Philips PCVC740K ToUcam Pro [pwc]
Bus 003 Device 001: ID :  
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 046d:c01e Logitech, Inc. MX518 Optical Mouse
Bus 002 Device 001: ID :  

I do have usbdevfs in proc in my kernel:

mws:/home/michael# mount
cpq:/diskless/mws on / type nfs 
(rw,hard,intr,nolock,rsize=4096,wsize=4096,addr=192.168.0.1)
tmpfs on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,size=1G)
cpq:/home/diskless/tftp/kernels/src on /usr/src type nfs (rw,addr=192.168.0.1)
cpq:/home/michael/.private/latex on /latex type nfs (rw,addr=192.168.0.1)
cpq:/home/michael/.private/music on /nfs/music type nfs (rw,addr=192.168.0.1)
/usr/src/linux-2.6.22.1 on /usr/src/linux type bind (rw,bind)
mfs:/bigdaddy on /nfs/bigdaddy type nfs 
(rw,user=root,nosuid,nodev,addr=192.168.0.25)
mfs:/torrents on /nfs/torrents type nfs 
(rw,user=root,nosuid,nodev,addr=192.168.0.25)
mfs:/crypt/pictures on /nfs/pictures type nfs 
(rw,user=root,nosuid,nodev,addr=192.168.0.25)
mfs:/crypt/scan on /nfs/scan type nfs 
(rw,user=root,nosuid,nodev,addr=192.168.0.25)
cpq:/home/michael/.private on /nfs/private type nfs (rw,addr=192.168.0.1)

mws:/home/michael# cat /proc/filesystems 
nodev   sysfs
nodev   rootfs
nodev   bdev
nodev   proc
nodev   sockfs
nodev   usbfs
nodev   pipefs
nodev   anon_inodefs
nodev   futexfs
nodev   tmpfs
nodev   inotifyfs
nodev   devpts
nodev   ramfs
nodev   hugetlbfs
msdos
vfat
iso9660
nodev   nfs
nodev   autofs
nodev   mqueue
nodev   oprofilefs
nodev   rpc_pipefs


Any idea what I am missing , I thought usb scanneres were using libusb nowadays
 so it should be autodetection ?:)

Best Regards
Michael Ole Olsen
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090629/db472e00/attachment.pgp


[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 650U not recognized except in lsusb?

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
what version of sane-backends, and what version of libusb?

allan

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net wrote:
 xsane-0.99 (debian lenny, with libsane also installed)

 i think the canon n650u lide scanner uses the plustek backend if it is of any 
 use?

 if i remove my webcam i just get 'no devices detected' but lsusb lists it.

 /Michael Ole Olsen


 On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:

 My USB Canon CanoScan LIDE N650U is not getting recognized, except in lsusb.

 For some reason my scanner stopped working after i changed system and kernel

 I cannot use a newer kernel than this 2.6.22.1 or my ati drivers will
 not work. the kernel is custom compiled from kernel.org and has 
 ehci,uhci,ohci
 compiled in as modules and also usb devfs enabled

 mws:/home/michael# mount -t usbfs
 procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)

 when starting xsane as normal user in group 'scanner' it just opens 
 /dev/video0 instead , which my my webcam
 I tried removing the webcam from the usb hub without luck.

 Nothing in dmesg:
 udevd version 125 started
 usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 36
 usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
 usb 1-4.2: USB disconnect, address 36
 usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 37
 usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
 usb 1-4.2: USB disconnect, address 37
 usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 38
 usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice


 I have tried opening the device files that udev makes (with xsane 
 /dev/usbdev)
 ?but i just get invalid argument, here is udev debug output (directly after 
 insert of usbcable into scanner):

 [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2767 queued, 'add' 'usb'
 [26462] udev_event_run: seq 2767 forked, pid [27019], 'add' 'usb', 0 seconds 
 old
 [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2768 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
 [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2769 queued, 'add' 'usb'
 [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2770 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
 [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2771 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
 [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2772 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
 [27019] run_program: 'check-ptp-camera 06/01/01'
 [27019] run_program: '/lib/udev/check-ptp-camera' returned with status 1
 [27019] udev_rules_get_name: rule applied, '1-4.2' becomes 'bus/usb/001/038'
 [27019] match_rule: set ENV 'libsane_matched=yes'
 [27019] udev_db_get_device: no db file to read 
 /dev/.udev/db/\x2fdevices\x2fpci:00\x2f:00:1d.7\x2fusb1\x2f1-4\x2f1-4.2:
  No such file or directory
 [27019] udev_node_add: creating device node '/dev/bus/usb/001/038', 
 major=189, minor=37, mode=0664, uid=0, gid=105
 [27019] udev_node_mknod: mknod(/dev/bus/usb/001/038, 020664, (189,37))
 [27019] udev_node_mknod: chmod(/dev/bus/usb/001/038, 020664)
 [27019] udev_node_mknod: chown(/dev/bus/usb/001/038, 0, 105)
 [27019] name_index: creating index: 
 '/dev/.udev/names/bus\x2fusb\x2f001\x2f038/\x2fdevices\x2fpci:00\x2f:00:1d.7\x2fusb1\x2f1-4\x2f1-4.2'
 [27019] pass_env_to_socket: passed -1 bytes to socket 
 '@/org/kernel/udev/monitor',
 [27019] run_program: '/bin/sh -c 'test -e 
 /sys//devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-4/1-4.2/power/level  echo on 
  /sys//devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-4/1-4.2/power/level''
 [27019] run_program: '/bin/sh' returned with status 1
 [27019] udev_event_run: seq 2767 finished with -1
 [26462] udev_done: seq 2767, pid [27019] exit with 1, 0 seconds old
 [26462] udev_event_run: seq 2768 forked, pid [27022], 'add' 'usb_endpoint', 
 0 seconds old
 [26462] udev_event_run: seq 2769 forked, pid [27023], 'add' 'usb', 0 seconds 
 old
 [27022] udev_rules_get_name: no node name set, will use kernel name 
 'usbdev1.38_ep00'
 [27023] run_program: '/sbin/modprobe --use-blacklist 
 usb:v04A9p2206d0100dc00dsc00dp00icFFisc00ipFF'
 [27022] udev_db_get_device: no db file to read 
 /dev/.udev/db/\x2fclass\x2fusb_endpoint\x2fusbdev1.38_ep00: No such file or 
 directory
 [27022] udev_node_add: creating device node '/dev/usbdev1.38_ep00', 
 major=254, minor=21, mode=0660, uid=0, gid=0
 [27022] udev_node_mknod: mknod(/dev/usbdev1.38_ep00, 020660, (254,21))
 [27022] udev_node_mknod: chmod(/dev/usbdev1.38_ep00, 020660)
 [27022] udev_node_mknod: chown(/dev/usbdev1.38_ep00, 0, 0)
 [27022] name_index: creating index: 
 '/dev/.udev/names/usbdev1.38_ep00/\x2fclass\x2fusb_endpoint\x2fusbdev1.38_ep00'
 [27022] pass_env_to_socket: passed -1 bytes to socket 
 '@/org/kernel/udev/monitor',
 [27022] udev_event_run: seq 2768 finished with 0
 [26462] udev_done: seq 2768, pid [27022] exit with 0, 0 seconds old
 [27023] run_program: '/sbin/modprobe' (stderr) 'FATAL: Module 
 usb:v04A9p2206d0100dc00dsc00dp00icFFisc00ipFF not found.'
 [27023] run_program: '/sbin/modprobe' returned with status 1
 [27023] pass_env_to_socket: passed -1 bytes to socket 
 '@/org/kernel/udev/monitor',
 [27023] udev_event_run: seq 2769 finished with -1
 [26462] udev_done: seq 

[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 650U not recognized except in lsusb?

2009-06-29 Thread Michael Ole Olsen
/4Lgcbw5oJdc
  NP0uaP0MuTWadNUzrl6jh/7MwpSwrB/Bv+T5Qgk9VFvziwgqqQgd4K3Yc/Dig1j6
  823+E6KX0evWeKKpFKQoNy9WPolTUONxmo5B7z/0G92PDpXE/fyMg4/dfeT/EB2C
  mqPUhjM9AzjK02T+t7/Q1gpr+zlilr0IJQcCOu4FPVl5duO/InVKIOAg8Ecjcwe9
  EsF9DqVM1C4F/gTTvatJJB1kaiW0HD9+RFFTKSwHK+vc9aeV2I2TyFziw6hD+J3G
  9xSkMvupdtGHFlukhxlncw0apN6KbMLaJfVzhJXpY7gY2xHIM7NVzzUUdJuRWnxj
  3C3DS7ogTjUQaxNrf7KOeUvYXP0nD5Cx96g8s5Hp5Qx6omV+oU44kxJaes5mnSKe
  cedg4VAZ7aLQdXeoMACqd1GuVC8oII7xWtROfLoXHJIm6L1fYpOCqcJoZ8soKqHd
  oE1vKhg2IB0LAc0pk/DZiUcQDAL2RWVK5ftwWP1LSts2SMtTK/oIByfUeMq934Rl
  aOV+8Nz9AmHwj+Ss9TUi1xIe27ffLEYi2cKPjsG7UFitvr/JVlzGsJHJXf5y1ViB
  xfwu9ifm7RdruxSwnFKZ
  =GYAR
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
  --
  sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
  Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
  ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 The truth is an offense, but not a sin
 
 --
 sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
 Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
  to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090629/3fe89894/attachment-0001.pgp


[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 650U not recognized except in lsusb?

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
Does `scanimage -L` list the device? If not, try it as root. If that
works, it would indicate a permissions problem.

allan

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net wrote:
 I think the backends got moved to just 'libsane' ,
 i think its ?name was sane-backend before or such.

 All fetched via apt in lenny.

 mws:/home/michael# dpkg -l|grep sane
 ii ?libsane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.0.19-23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
 library for scanners
 ii ?libsane-extras ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.19.11 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
 library for scanners -- extra backends
 ii ?libwine-sane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.1-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Windows 
 API implementation - scanner module
 ii ?sane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.14-7 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? scanner 
 graphical frontends
 ii ?sane-utils ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.19-23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
 library for scanners -- utilities
 ii ?xsane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0.996-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
 ?featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scan
 ii ?xsane-common ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0.996-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
 ?featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scan
 mws:/home/michael# dpkg -l|grep libusb
 ii ?libusb-0.1-4 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2:0.1.12-13 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?userspace 
 USB programming library
 ii ?libusb-dev ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2:0.1.12-13 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?userspace 
 USB programming library developmen

 mws:/home/michael# xsane -v
 xsane-0.996 (c) 1998-2007 Oliver Rauch
 ?E-mail: Oliver.Rauch at xsane.org
 ?package xsane-0.996
 ?compiled with GTK-2.12.11
 ?with color management function
 ?with GIMP support, compiled with GIMP-2.4.7
 ?XSane output formats: jpeg, pdf(compr.), png, pnm, ps(compr.), tiff, txt



 On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, m. allan noah wrote:

 what version of sane-backends, and what version of libusb?

 allan

 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net wrote:
  xsane-0.99 (debian lenny, with libsane also installed)
 
  i think the canon n650u lide scanner uses the plustek backend if it is of 
  any use?
 
  if i remove my webcam i just get 'no devices detected' but lsusb lists it.
 
  /Michael Ole Olsen
 
 
  On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
 
  My USB Canon CanoScan LIDE N650U is not getting recognized, except in 
  lsusb.
 
  For some reason my scanner stopped working after i changed system and 
  kernel
 
  I cannot use a newer kernel than this 2.6.22.1 or my ati drivers will
  not work. the kernel is custom compiled from kernel.org and has 
  ehci,uhci,ohci
  compiled in as modules and also usb devfs enabled
 
  mws:/home/michael# mount -t usbfs
  procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
 
  when starting xsane as normal user in group 'scanner' it just opens 
  /dev/video0 instead , which my my webcam
  I tried removing the webcam from the usb hub without luck.
 
  Nothing in dmesg:
  udevd version 125 started
  usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 36
  usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
  usb 1-4.2: USB disconnect, address 36
  usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 37
  usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
  usb 1-4.2: USB disconnect, address 37
  usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 38
  usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
 
 
  I have tried opening the device files that udev makes (with xsane 
  /dev/usbdev)
  ?but i just get invalid argument, here is udev debug output (directly 
  after insert of usbcable into scanner):
 
  [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2767 queued, 'add' 'usb'
  [26462] udev_event_run: seq 2767 forked, pid [27019], 'add' 'usb', 0 
  seconds old
  [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2768 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
  [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2769 queued, 'add' 'usb'
  [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2770 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
  [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2771 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
  [26462] msg_queue_insert: seq 2772 queued, 'add' 'usb_endpoint'
  [27019] run_program: 'check-ptp-camera 06/01/01'
  [27019] run_program: '/lib/udev/check-ptp-camera' returned with status 1
  [27019] udev_rules_get_name: rule applied, '1-4.2' becomes 
  'bus/usb/001/038'
  [27019] match_rule: set ENV 'libsane_matched=yes'
  [27019] udev_db_get_device: no db file to read 
  /dev/.udev/db/\x2fdevices\x2fpci:00\x2f:00:1d.7\x2fusb1\x2f1-4\x2f1-4.2:
   No such file or directory
  [27019] udev_node_add: creating device node '/dev/bus/usb/001/038', 
  major=189, minor=37, mode=0664, uid=0, gid=105
  [27019] udev_node_mknod: mknod(/dev/bus/usb/001/038, 020664, (189,37))
  [27019] udev_node_mknod: chmod(/dev/bus/usb/001/038, 020664)
  [27019] udev_node_mknod: chown(/dev/bus/usb/001/038, 0, 105)
  [27019] name_index: creating index: 
  '/dev/.udev/names/bus\x2fusb\x2f001\x2f038/\x2fdevices\x2fpci:00\x2f:00:1d.7\x2fusb1\x2f1-4\x2f1-4.2'
  [27019] pass_env_to_socket: passed -1 bytes to socket 
  '@/org/kernel/udev/monitor',
  [27019] 

[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 650U not recog. Fixed, but new problem

2009-06-29 Thread Michael Ole Olsen
hello i found out that i had forgot to log completely out after adding to
group scanner, scanimage -L worked as root

it works now

I apologize for wasting your time :)

I had the feeling it was something simple, hehe..

I did however try to chmod 777 /dev/usbdev* because i am not used to libusb :)

michael at mws:~% scanimage -L
device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Philips 740 webcam virtual device
device `plustek:libusb:001:038' is a Canon CanoScan N650U/N656U flatbed
scanner

unfortunately the scanner does not work (it used to with another kernel and
computer, with debian etch - now it is lenny)

the problem:
when scanning and the head is about to reposition itself after the scan 
it makes some loud noise as though it is about to destroy itself (but the
scanner head is only at the border of the small 10x5cm document).
Sounds like the head moves in the wrong direction 
(as though it tries to instruct it to move back while
it is moving forth)

the problem is reproducible if i try to scan before the head has repositioned
itself back after acquiring preview, then the scanner head stops and the scanner
makes a very loud noise as though it tries to move the scanner head forth 
while it is being moved back into place.

will try to see if upgrading sane to testing or unstable fixes it, i hope so
(as the scanner has been working before with libusb).

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, m. allan noah wrote:

 Does `scanimage -L` list the device? If not, try it as root. If that
 works, it would indicate a permissions problem.
 
 allan
 
 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net wrote:
  I think the backends got moved to just 'libsane' ,
  i think its ?name was sane-backend before or such.
 
  All fetched via apt in lenny.
 
  mws:/home/michael# dpkg -l|grep sane
  ii ?libsane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.0.19-23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
  library for scanners
  ii ?libsane-extras ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.19.11 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
  library for scanners -- extra backends
  ii ?libwine-sane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.1-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Windows 
  API implementation - scanner module
  ii ?sane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.14-7 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? scanner 
  graphical frontends
  ii ?sane-utils ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.19-23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
  library for scanners -- utilities
  ii ?xsane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0.996-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
  ?featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scan
  ii ?xsane-common ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0.996-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
  ?featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scan
  mws:/home/michael# dpkg -l|grep libusb
  ii ?libusb-0.1-4 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2:0.1.12-13 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
  ?userspace USB programming library
  ii ?libusb-dev ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2:0.1.12-13 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
  ?userspace USB programming library developmen
 
  mws:/home/michael# xsane -v
  xsane-0.996 (c) 1998-2007 Oliver Rauch
  ?E-mail: Oliver.Rauch at xsane.org
  ?package xsane-0.996
  ?compiled with GTK-2.12.11
  ?with color management function
  ?with GIMP support, compiled with GIMP-2.4.7
  ?XSane output formats: jpeg, pdf(compr.), png, pnm, ps(compr.), tiff, txt
 
 
 
  On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
 
  what version of sane-backends, and what version of libusb?
 
  allan
 
  On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net wrote:
   xsane-0.99 (debian lenny, with libsane also installed)
  
   i think the canon n650u lide scanner uses the plustek backend if it is 
   of any use?
  
   if i remove my webcam i just get 'no devices detected' but lsusb lists 
   it.
  
   /Michael Ole Olsen
  
  
   On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
  
   My USB Canon CanoScan LIDE N650U is not getting recognized, except in 
   lsusb.
  
   For some reason my scanner stopped working after i changed system and 
   kernel
  
   I cannot use a newer kernel than this 2.6.22.1 or my ati drivers will
   not work. the kernel is custom compiled from kernel.org and has 
   ehci,uhci,ohci
   compiled in as modules and also usb devfs enabled
  
   mws:/home/michael# mount -t usbfs
   procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
  
   when starting xsane as normal user in group 'scanner' it just opens 
   /dev/video0 instead , which my my webcam
   I tried removing the webcam from the usb hub without luck.
  
   Nothing in dmesg:
   udevd version 125 started
   usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 36
   usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
   usb 1-4.2: USB disconnect, address 36
   usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 37
   usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
   usb 1-4.2: USB disconnect, address 37
   usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 38
   usb 1-4.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
  
  
   I have tried opening the device files that udev makes (with xsane 
   /dev/usbdev)
   ?but i just get invalid argument, here is udev 

[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 650U not recog. Fixed, but new problem

2009-06-29 Thread Michael Ole Olsen
It might be a semidefect scanner

when it gets stuck i can only get it to move back if i shake it a bit, else it 
just
keeps being stuck somewhere when i press scan before the head is in position.

if i wait patiently and never press scan before the head has come back to the
start it seems to work now.

so I guess the problem has solved itself, thanks for any help offered.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:

 hello i found out that i had forgot to log completely out after adding to
 group scanner, scanimage -L worked as root
 
 it works now
 
 I apologize for wasting your time :)
 
 I had the feeling it was something simple, hehe..
 
 I did however try to chmod 777 /dev/usbdev* because i am not used to libusb :)
 
 michael at mws:~% scanimage -L
 device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Philips 740 webcam virtual device
 device `plustek:libusb:001:038' is a Canon CanoScan N650U/N656U flatbed
 scanner
 
 unfortunately the scanner does not work (it used to with another kernel and
 computer, with debian etch - now it is lenny)
 
 the problem:
 when scanning and the head is about to reposition itself after the scan 
 it makes some loud noise as though it is about to destroy itself (but the
 scanner head is only at the border of the small 10x5cm document).
 Sounds like the head moves in the wrong direction 
 (as though it tries to instruct it to move back while
 it is moving forth)
 
 the problem is reproducible if i try to scan before the head has repositioned
 itself back after acquiring preview, then the scanner head stops and the 
 scanner
 makes a very loud noise as though it tries to move the scanner head forth 
 while it is being moved back into place.
 
 will try to see if upgrading sane to testing or unstable fixes it, i hope so
 (as the scanner has been working before with libusb).
 
 On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
 
  Does `scanimage -L` list the device? If not, try it as root. If that
  works, it would indicate a permissions problem.
  
  allan
  
  On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net wrote:
   I think the backends got moved to just 'libsane' ,
   i think its ?name was sane-backend before or such.
  
   All fetched via apt in lenny.
  
   mws:/home/michael# dpkg -l|grep sane
   ii ?libsane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.0.19-23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
   library for scanners
   ii ?libsane-extras ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.19.11 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
   library for scanners -- extra backends
   ii ?libwine-sane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.1-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
   ?Windows API implementation - scanner module
   ii ?sane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.14-7 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
   scanner graphical frontends
   ii ?sane-utils ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1.0.19-23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?API 
   library for scanners -- utilities
   ii ?xsane ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0.996-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
   ?featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scan
   ii ?xsane-common ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0.996-1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
   ?featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scan
   mws:/home/michael# dpkg -l|grep libusb
   ii ?libusb-0.1-4 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2:0.1.12-13 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
   ?userspace USB programming library
   ii ?libusb-dev ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2:0.1.12-13 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 
   ?userspace USB programming library developmen
  
   mws:/home/michael# xsane -v
   xsane-0.996 (c) 1998-2007 Oliver Rauch
   ?E-mail: Oliver.Rauch at xsane.org
   ?package xsane-0.996
   ?compiled with GTK-2.12.11
   ?with color management function
   ?with GIMP support, compiled with GIMP-2.4.7
   ?XSane output formats: jpeg, pdf(compr.), png, pnm, ps(compr.), tiff, txt
  
  
  
   On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
  
   what version of sane-backends, and what version of libusb?
  
   allan
  
   On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Michael Ole Olsengnu at gmx.net 
   wrote:
xsane-0.99 (debian lenny, with libsane also installed)
   
i think the canon n650u lide scanner uses the plustek backend if it is 
of any use?
   
if i remove my webcam i just get 'no devices detected' but lsusb lists 
it.
   
/Michael Ole Olsen
   
   
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
   
My USB Canon CanoScan LIDE N650U is not getting recognized, except in 
lsusb.
   
For some reason my scanner stopped working after i changed system and 
kernel
   
I cannot use a newer kernel than this 2.6.22.1 or my ati drivers will
not work. the kernel is custom compiled from kernel.org and has 
ehci,uhci,ohci
compiled in as modules and also usb devfs enabled
   
mws:/home/michael# mount -t usbfs
procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
   
when starting xsane as normal user in group 'scanner' it just opens 
/dev/video0 instead , which my my webcam
I tried removing the webcam from the usb hub without luck.
   
Nothing in dmesg:
udevd version 125 started
usb 1-4.2: new full speed USB device using 

[sane-devel] GT68xx Backend Driver for Mustek??

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
I thought the version of the gt68xx backend in our current release was
the most updated one?

allan

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Usagiusagi at usagis-house.net wrote:
 It looks like Meier Geinitz?s site is down where you used to be able to
 download this.
 Does anyone have any info?
 Thank you! ^_^
 --
 sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
 Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
 ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org




-- 
The truth is an offense, but not a sin



[sane-devel] [Fwd: Subject:-Crashing Fire fox browser when running SaneAppletExample.java.]

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
amit- I'm sorry, but there don't seem to be many (any?) java
developers in our ranks, and the existing java bindings are basically
unsupported, so I think you are on your own. You do have the source to
look at however :)

allan

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Henning Geinitzsane at geinitz.org wrote:
 FYI

  Original-Nachricht 
 Betreff: ? ? ? ?Subject:-Crashing Fire fox browser when running
 SaneAppletExample.java.
 Datum: ?Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:21:26 +0530
 Von: ? ?amitdubein at gmail.com amitdubein at gmail.com
 An: ? ? hmg-guest at users.alioth.debian.org








 Respected Sir,



 We are using your Scan applet Example for scanning, but we are facing some
 problem while running the applet on fire fox 3.0 with O/S Linux open Suse 
 scanner HP 3050.

 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? We face crashing problem when
 we go through the following steps.



 1) ? ? ? ? Start Application.

 2) ? ? ? ? Call applet.

 3) ? ? ? ? Click on acquire.

 4) ? ? ? ? Click on Start.

 5) ? ? ? ? Scan image (It completely scan selected image  goes to desired
 path.).

 6) ? ? ? ? When we click on close button.

 7) ? ? ? ? The browser gets crashed.



 It will very helpful if you give some solution on above problem.





 --
 Regards

 Amitkumar Dube
 Software Developer



 --
 sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
 Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
 ? ? ? ? ? ?to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org




-- 
The truth is an offense, but not a sin



[sane-devel] Translation missing

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
I have alerted the author

allan

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:55 AM, yann_ubuntu-1 at yahoo.fr wrote:

 Dear all,

 thank you for your work.
 I subscribed this ML to report the following bug:
 in Ubuntu 9.04, French translation is missing in Xsane image viewer, for 3 
 Rotation buttons:
 - Rotate image 90 degrees should be Rotation ? 90?
 - Rotate image 180 degrees should be Rotation ? 180?
 - Rotate image 270 degrees should be Rotation ? 270?

 see capture : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsane/+bug/390436

 Please could you forward this bug to whom may be concerned?

 Regards,
 YannUbuntu







 --
 sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
 Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
 ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org




-- 
The truth is an offense, but not a sin



[sane-devel] [PATCH] Avision backend: Mark FCPA 620C with AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Ozan ?a?layanozan at pardus.org.tr wrote:
 Ozan ?a?layan wrote On 23-06-2009 12:48:
 backend/avision.c: Mark Fujitsu ScanPartner 620C with
 AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS as it currently refuses to work through avision
 after 90 tries:



 BTW, the scanner works well with sp15c backend and it's marked as *good*
 in avision.c. So it's possible that the previous patch is not the
 optimal solution to the problem if it was working OK some time ago.

 Tested with 1.0.19 and 1.0.20.

I will commit your patch, since it is easy to revert. The avision
backend author may be able to comment further on the status.


 And an additional question: Both avision and sp15c seem to support this
 device. What is the policy about those situations in sane-backends? Is
 there a some sort of *recommended* flag to mark a backend more stable
 than other or is the backend selection completely left to the user?


Well, in this particular case I think the sp15c backend probably
supported these Avision-built Fujitsu machines better at one time, but
that driver is unmaintained now. On the other hand, the avision
backend supports a huge number of machines, so unintended regressions
can sometimes be a problem.

allan
-- 
The truth is an offense, but not a sin



[sane-devel] Ukrainian translation

2009-06-29 Thread m. allan noah
thanks- I will add this momentarily.

allan

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Yuri Chornoivanyurchor at ukr.net wrote:
 Hi!

 Attached to this message you can find an archived version of sane-backends
 Ukrainian translation.

 Thanks in advance.
 Yuri
 --
 sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
 Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
 ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org




-- 
The truth is an offense, but not a sin