Re: [sane-devel] genesys Canon Lide 210 aspect-ratio-problem at 600 dpi
Am Montag, den 05. Mai schrieb Stef: M G Berberich wrote: 2400 dpi and 4800 dpi do not work at all, but never did. 2400 and 4800 dpi scans works on my LiDE 210. So I'd need some logs or better information on what is not working for you. For what it's worth I also see 2400dpi and 4800dpi working fine on my LiDE 110, and producing correct (undistorted) aspect ratio. Andrew -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[sane-devel] sane-avision HP 5370C
Hi, I own a HP 5370C and it didn't work anymore since firmware checking had been added in this commit: https://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sane/sane-backends.git;a=commitdiff;h=fec4800d7da9f14ff3ca8f82b1327ec9aed76318 Please, could you revert it? Here is a trace with current release: [avision] attach: Scanner matched entry: 66: HP, ScanJet 5370C, 0x03f0, 0x0701 [avision] attach: reading firmware status [avision] get_firmware_status [avision] Timeouts: write: 3, read: 3, status: 1 [avision] try to write cmd, count: 10. [avision] wrote 10 bytes [avision] try to read 8 bytes [avision] read 1 bytes [avision] Got 1 byte - status? (0) Resending. [avision] try to write cmd, count: 10. [avision] wrote 10 bytes [avision] try to read 8 bytes [avision] read 1 bytes [avision] Got 1 byte - status? (0) Resending. [avision] try to write cmd, count: 10. [avision] wrote 0 bytes [avision] === Got error 9 trying to write, wrote: 0. === [avision] try to read status to clear the FIFO [avision] avision_usb_status: timeout 500, 1 retries [avision] == (bulk read) going down ... [avision] == (bulk read) got: 0, status: 0 [avision] == (interrupt read) got: 0, status: 0 [avision] === Got error 9 trying to read status. === [avision] get_firmware_status: read failed (Error during device I/O) [avision] attach: get firmware status failed (Error during device I/O) It works perfectly when I replace AV_FIRMWARE by 0. NB: I would open a bug report but it an account on Alioth is required and I have no plan to get one. -- Benoit Izac -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] scanimage / tesseract interoperability
Jeffrey, gscan2pdf is terrific and I expect most users will prefer the friendly graphical user interface. I would love to compare notes with you on PDF generation nuances, and also coordinate with respect to future Tesseract releases. It's also good have the command line programs connect together nicely through pipes, in the unix tradition. The necessary modifications on the Tesseract side are almost ready, so it is a good time to look at the scanimage side. Cheers, Jeff -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] scanimage / tesseract interoperability
We would accept a patch which adds a new argument to scanimage which causes it to output the filename to stdout when it is in batch mode. In single scan mode, this will never work, because the image is printed on stdout. Another option is to add the filename to stderr, which already has some meta info. Then tesseract (or an intermediate script) could parse and extract the image name. That would make your command lines more complicated, however. allan On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote: Jeffrey, gscan2pdf is terrific and I expect most users will prefer the friendly graphical user interface. I would love to compare notes with you on PDF generation nuances, and also coordinate with respect to future Tesseract releases. It's also good have the command line programs connect together nicely through pipes, in the unix tradition. The necessary modifications on the Tesseract side are almost ready, so it is a good time to look at the scanimage side. Cheers, Jeff -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- The truth is an offense, but not a sin -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
