On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23, Luke Campagnola wrote:
I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was
supported
(I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and rather than
sending it back, I'm giving a go at writing the backend. I'm most of the way
Hi,
I've been using xsane on my IBM Thinkpad for quite a while with no problems.
Running kernel 2.6.7 until last week when I upgraded to 2.6.10.
I now find that (x)sane is unable to locate my scanner -
and Epsom Perfection 1240U. Looking into it further I find that the
usbdevfs fails to mount at
b...@beeb.net wrote:
The error message in the log says 'usbdevfs not supported in kernel'.
IIRC, the filesystem in question has long been renamed from usbdevfs
to usbfs, and recently the old alias was removed.
johannes
Hello,
I have made a patch for sanei_usb.c and sanei_usb.h to provide the
following:
-More debug info for control and isochronous mode
-Detects endpoints for different configurations, interface and
altsetting numbers 0
- Routine added for changing configuration, interface or altsetting
number
--0-74252862-1106056842=:14515
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
I had this error message during installation of the drivers for hp scanjet 8290
on a win98 Computer and had the errors below. My PC has 12GD HDD, 64M RAM, and
runs on win98.
Can someone help me out on this error
Hi,
Kodwo Arizie wrote:
I had this error message during installation of the drivers for hp
scanjet 8290 on a win98 Computer and had the errors below. My PC has
12GD HDD, 64M RAM, and runs on win98.
Can someone help me out on this error message. Thanks
*//*
No. The software your scanner
I've already found that libieee1284 doesn't work on the FreeBSD 5.x
series and consequently my parallel port scanner will not work. (it
works as a nice paperweight though)
Before going out and buying a new scanner, I was curious if anyone has
had any luck getting USB scanners to work under
--=-G2Ge2qX71EHeEV2nS+0H
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
Proposal to increase the buffersize of buffer[32 * 1024] to
buffer[1024 * 1024] for frontend scanimage for diff zie attachment.
In this way the write cycle in sane_read will be reduced and is it
possible to
gerard klaver schrieb:
In this way the write cycle in sane_read will be reduced and is it
possible to write a image from for example a 640 x 480 webcam in
one cycle to the frontend buffer.
What's the advantage? If there really is an advantage, I think it should
probably be made dynamic
Hi,
I'd like to make sure the hp4200 backend (sources from the sourceforce
hp4200-backend project + Frank Zago's patch) works with libusb.
If someone using this backend or owning this scanner is reading this
mail, can you please report ?
Thanks,
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
10 matches
Mail list logo
