or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060108/7b7dd185/attachment.htm
From photopi...@interia.pl Sat Jan 7 23:48
hangs the SCSI bus. On the other hand the vuescan does a good job with
it (too bad it's not free and not open source).
Hm, vuescan is reasonably priced, has a user interface, supports it8
targets, process calibration and reasonably good infrared cleaning, and
most importantly, actually works...
Jon Chambers j...@jon.demon.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
1. Hopefully trivial: I have written a dummy backend and sym-linked
it to /usr/lib/sane/libsane-dell1600n-net.so. How can I get a SANE
frontend to find it?
Add dell1600n to /etc/sane.d/dll.conf.
2. The Dell 1600n sends data back in CCITT Fax
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 10:16, Julien BLACHE wrote:
2. The Dell 1600n sends data back in CCITT Fax Group 4 or JPEG formats
(for monochrome or colour scans respectively). To convert this to an
array of RGB data will require converstion via an external library
(eg: libjpeg). Is this extra link
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 14:27, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Most annoying that it doesn't work with SCSI scanners on 64bit machines,
something a recompile would fix. Hence my recent question about write()
encapsulation in sanei_scsi.c (which no-one replied to :( ).
I didn't answer because I'm not really
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 00:05, Ben Tasker wrote:
I recently posted on this list about a Xerox 4800 flatbed scanner. After a
little investigation it would seem that Xerox have simply rebranded the
Visioneer 4800 scanner. If the Visioneer 4800 one touch is ever supported I
assume the Xerox will be as
Hi Parag,
Am Sonntag 08 Januar 2006 01:53 schrieb
sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org:
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:09:16 +0530
From: Parag N() panem...@gmail.com
Subject: [sane-devel] require Hp2300C linux debug messages
To: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
of creating (or extending) the SANE back-end?
See SANE website, section Contributing. See also the archive of this
mailing list for similar questions about writing backends.
OK, I'd like to try. Should I contact the manufacturer for protocol
Hi Torsten,
waiting for linux log for Hp2300c from you. if you got it
please send me it to my email.
Regards,
Parag.
On 1/8/06, Torsten Evers tev...@onlinehome.de wrote:
Hi Parag,
Am Sonntag 08 Januar 2006 01:53 schrieb
sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org:
Message: 1
sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060108/1f2cbc07/attachment.htm
From henn...@meier
Hi,
On 2006-01-07 05:15, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
-#if defined(__linux__) || defined (HAVE_SYS_HW_H)
+#if defined(__GLIBC__) || defined (HAVE_SYS_HW_H)
But this means that Linux without glibc won' work, which is the reason
for this one:
#elif HAVE_ASM_IO_H
# include asm/io.h /* older
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:31:05 + (GMT)
Jon Chambers j...@jon.demon.co.uk wrote:
I have written a driver for network scanning using a Dell 1600n MFP. It
is implemented as a perl script and can be found here:
http://www.jon.demon.co.uk/dell1600n-net-scan/
I am currently in the process of
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 14:17, Andrei V. Toutoukine wrote:
OK, I'd like to try. Should I contact the manufacturer for protocol
details or maybe someone has these already?
Asking is always a good idea. If they don't have a protocol
description, maybe they can give you the source code of the windows
Hi developers,
The format of the SANE description files (.desc) has been changed to
allow the addition of USB vendor and product ids to each model entry.
These ids will be shown in the HTML lists (and all other output
formats) and therefore help to identify a USB scanner exactly. The
second
Hi Alessandro,
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
SANE actually misses a network transport and, since I'm dealing
with a network capable MFP too, we can maybe coordinate the
efforts to create and test one. Let me know if you're interested.
This could be useful. What scanner are
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 14:27, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Most annoying that it doesn't work with SCSI scanners on 64bit machines,
something a recompile would fix. Hence my recent question about write()
encapsulation in sanei_scsi.c (which no-one replied to :( ).
I didn't
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:16:38 + (GMT)
Jon Chambers j...@jon.demon.co.uk wrote:
This could be useful. What scanner are you working on and what stage are
you at? Do you know the network protocol? Do you have a working
prototype? Have you made a start on a SANE backend?
Epson CX11NF.
Hi Alessandro,
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
I agree. I only know of unix sockets, so probably the first version won't work
straight on windows...
I don't see any #ifdef WIN32 in the SANE code so I don't think that is a
target platform. Nonetheless there are MaC OS and OS2
Hi again,
On 2006-01-08 17:00, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
formats) and therefore help to identify a USB scanner exactly. The
second reason for adding these ids to the description files is to
generate the lists for hotplug/udev events (e.g. libsane.usermap)
automatically from the description
Most annoying that it doesn't work with SCSI scanners on 64bit machines,
something a recompile would fix. Hence my recent question about write()
encapsulation in sanei_scsi.c (which no-one replied to :( ).
If somebody else needs such a special handling because of the
binary-only nature of
Hi,
He doesn't want to recompile
for 64bit because the amount of money he makes from the Linux
version doesn't justify it.
Err... excuse me? I don't think the amount of money any of the SANE
developers makes from SANE development justifies any effort on this
behalf.
I can understand your
Hi,
On 2006-01-09 09:54, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
1) sane is an API for scanners which works
2) sane is *NOT* a scanning application, i.e. some software which gets
some scanning work done.
sane-backends is not. Frontends like scanimage, xscanimage and xsane
are.
3) xsane is a GUI around
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 19:40, Jon Chambers wrote:
I don't see any #ifdef WIN32 in the SANE code so I don't think that is a
target platform.
See README.windows...
Bye,
Henning
Hi Mr. Kuhlmann,
I was the one to bring up the issue with the SPARC workaround, the sane folks
helped me a lot to do the testing and find out that using the old interface
made everything work.
And, as a matter of fact, everything on SPARC64 is compiled 32 bit in the user
world. Only the kernel
Err... excuse me? I don't think the amount of money any of the SANE
developers makes from SANE development justifies any effort on this
behalf.
I am aware of that, and I wasn't asking the sane developers for any
effort, unless you count brain-picking as effort.
No, there goes Vuescan is
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[snip]
but not a scanning application either,
Come on.
In the context of scanning negatives and films using high end scanners
xsane is not scanning application but a toy.
its results are useless. Take this as a fact which we can debate
elsewhere
26 matches
Mail list logo
