Hi,
On 2006-05-09 22:07, Jon Chambers wrote:
Any idea where select.h is on HPUX? (select is a POSIX call so I guess it
is somewhere?) I suspect that these issues are likely to be common to
most network scanner backends so maybe sanei_tcp.h would be the correct
place for this kind of
Hi,
On 2006-05-20 16:50, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
Just use sane-backends 1.0.17 to generate the udev rules file. There
is no need to run make or make install in this case, just copy the
rules file to the appropriate location.
Still nothing. I've added my user account to the scanner group,
Hi,
On 2006-05-13 21:01, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
another problem I think I found on this patch is at about line 1525 of the
patched file, where it is i = (xfer_len_in 0x3f); while it should be
i = (xfer_len_in 0x3f); with a single ampersand.
Ok. Could you (or somebody else) post a patch that
Hi,
On 2006-04-20 20:46, Alfred Egger wrote:
I also an owner of the 4200f and I searched for information of the Chips
inside this scanner a while ago. According to this site the chips are:
[...]
Maybe someone could integrate this information on the site I noticed above.
Thanks! Your info
Hi,
On 2006-04-18 14:42, Michael Schwipps wrote:
I'm writing a small client application and use saned.
The tests of the client use then pnm-backend.
There seems to be a bug in this backend.
Sorry for the long delay for answering.
I just had a quick look at the ocde but I couldn't find any
Hi,
On 2006-02-27 13:26, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
Thanks. I haven't looked at the actual code yet, just some formal
things:
[..]
ok, I will modify the license. please drop me a note when you'll have
reviewed the code so I can send the new version just once.
Sorry for the long
Hi,
Has anybody tested the Canon LiDE 40 with the genesys backend? I guess
it works, but it's still listed as untested in our lists.
Please tell us if it works (or not).
Bye,
Henning
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody tested the Canon LiDE 40 with the genesys backend? I guess
it works, but it's still listed as untested in our lists.
Please tell us if it works (or not).
Bye,
Henning
Hi,
seeing that more and more scanner models of the LiDE series
Hi,
On 2006-05-21 19:02, Nikolas Arend wrote:
seeing that more and more scanner models of the LiDE series become
supported... is there any progress for the LiDE 80? I can't help coding
atm, but I could test the backend. The LiDE 80 is still listed as
unsupported, but I guess its chipset is
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-05-21 19:02, Nikolas Arend wrote:
seeing that more and more scanner models of the LiDE series become
supported... is there any progress for the LiDE 80? I can't help coding
atm, but I could test the backend. The LiDE 80 is still listed as
I neglected to add my libusb-0.1.12 information to the previous long
configuration description, which apparently directly affects the udev
device node mapping, permissions, etc.
I also found this forum comment:
What *should* happen is that the udev rules in
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules get
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-- next part
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 10-libsane.rules
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 29058 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060521
Henning Meier-Geinitz henn...@meier-geinitz.de wrote:
- geniusvp2: Nobody volunteered to move it into CVS and maintain it
there. Julien reported that the geniusvp2 doesn't release ppdev
problem is still there.
Hi,
I'm the current maintainer of the geniusvp2 backend. Due to lack of
time, I
13 matches
Mail list logo
