[sane-devel] Mustek 1200 ED parport scanner

Hallo! If someone still develop support for this scanner - i can offer my tests servises. I need to run this scanner in local college. And i would be glad to talk to someone who is working on it. If you need any information, debugs, test - please ask! -- With best regards. Azovtzev Jury

[sane-devel] canon lide 600f support

Hello Everyone I would like to know if support for the scanner canon lide 600f is planned? It's a very good scanner. tried it on windows. Thanks in advance Sapir

[sane-devel] Canon N670U problems

Hi, The SANE Canon N670U driver has a status of complete on the sane web site, but the behaviour I'm seeing is seriously broken. I'm using SANE as found in the fedora 7 distribution with sane version 1.0.18 and xsane 0.994. It does recognise the device, and occasionally scans and previews

[sane-devel] Canon N670U problems

Hi, No scanimage gives the same dreadful noise from the scanner. -- Dave m. allan noah wrote: does it work at all with scanimage? allan On 8/7/07, David Campbell david at pastornet.net.au wrote: Hi, The SANE Canon N670U driver has a status of complete on the sane web site, but the

[sane-devel] Kyocera Mita FS-1116MFP

On Tuesday 07 August 2007 12:08:04 Andreas Pape wrote: Hello everyone, planning to operate my new laptop only with linux I'd like to know whether it makes sense to buy a Kyocera Mita FS-1116MFP, one of thingies, that's able to do everything aside making coffee ... I guess printing won't

[sane-devel] Formulardaten

On 2007-08-08 00:26, Jonas Jacobsen wrote: Thank you so much for your quick reply. I'm not sure if i get the right version (or do it the right way), so if it's not to much to ask, please help me with a link to the right version. http://www.sane-project.org/snapshots/ Bye, Henning

[sane-devel] xsane infinite loop lockup - seems to boil down to compiler optimisation difference

Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2007, 22:28 +1000 schrieb David Campbell: This means that the current comparison if (new_val != val) in the xsane_back_gtk_value_update() function in xsane-back-gtk.c is invalid, because if there is the slightest difference in the floating point value (and there

[sane-devel] xsane infinite loop lockup - seems to boil down to compiler optimisation difference

Hi, OK - thanks for your comment! Here's what I am seeing from the debug entry you request: [xsane] val = 39019942, new_val = 39019943 [xsane] val = 39019942, new_val = 39019943 [xsane] val = 39019942, new_val = 39019943 [xsane] val = 39019942, new_val = 39019943 [xsane] val = 39019942, new_val

[sane-devel] xsane infinite loop lockup - seems to boil down to compiler optimisation difference

Hi Oliver, Yes, that does correct the issue. Thanks! Having fixed that, the hp5590 scanner driver works pretty well, although there are a couple things I mention below. If you wouldn't mind taking a look over this for me, it would be much appreciated. [1] [dcampbel at Vigor12 ~]$ scanimage

[sane-devel] Formulardaten

=== == Neuer Eintrag === --- -- Formular: 'adddev' --- 1. Your email address: 'poyobulk at hotmail.com' 2. Manufacturer

[sane-devel] Epson 4870 IR scanning / mystery command

I try to activate IR scanning on my Epson 4870. I believe that the IR channel is captured in a second scan of the film whereby the scanning light and scanning head is somewhat differently positioned. I couldn't find the how in the public Epson manuals. The people from Epson developer were kind -

[sane-devel] Formulardaten

=== == Neuer Eintrag === --- -- Formular: 'adddev' --- 1. Your email address: 'jobrn at web.de' 2. Manufacturer (e.g.