Hello,
here a few things I noticed on the diff with previous version:
msgstr Vitesse normal - msgstr Vitesse normale
mirroir - miroir
Apr?s avoir envoyer la commande de num?risation, attendre l'appui du
bouton avant de commencer la num?risation.
- Apr?s avoir envoy?
Hi,
I never had a sp15c scanner, but I voted in the past to let
someone test the functionality and if all just works with the
Avision backend get rid of the duplicate sp15c backend
(same probably holds for the tamarack backend).
Regarding the concurency: This should not be a big voting point, as
quelques f?tes dans sane-backends.fr.po (revision 1.41 from CVS)
msgstr Effectue une num?risation en niveaux de gris plutot qu'en
couleurs = Effectue une num?risation en niveaux de gris plut?t qu'en
couleurs
msgstr Echantillonage = Echantillonnage
msgstr Echantillonage mat?riel = Echantillonnage
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: genesys_devices.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 22784 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080115/a47bdceb/attachment-0001.c
-- next part --
A non-text attachment
. |
?--?---?--??
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sane-backends.fr.po.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 13456 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080115/bcb09f68/attachment.patch
Hi folks, I am struggling to compile sane-backends on FC8 x86_64
I've googled and searched the lists but the only similar problem I could
find was back in June 2004 and the noted solution didn't work for me.
Please can anyone help? The output of make is below. Please let me know
if I need to
look in config.log for the getenv test. what is the result?
allan
On 1/15/08, Chris chris at cenolan.com wrote:
Hi folks, I am struggling to compile sane-backends on FC8 x86_64
I've googled and searched the lists but the only similar problem I could
find was back in June 2004 and the noted
thats an option- but remember to cut out their usb_reset patch- it is
a bad idea...
allan
On 1/15/08, Martin Kho mkho at xs4all.nl wrote:
Why don't you use a source rpm specific for f-8? You can also see which
patches the fedora folks have made. Maybe the spec-file gives you some more
clues.
