Hello friends, sane-developpers, sane-users and everyone else who may be
interested.
I have been active for more than ten years for SANE and on the
sane-devel mailing list now. In the last years my priorities have
changed and so I decided to spend my time for my family and my little
doughter in
do, not only what should I do.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080401/fda487b1/attachment.htm
see sane standard section 4.1- this is protection against incompatible
frontends and backends trying to communicate.
allan
On 4/1/08, windflying zhou windflying.zhou at gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All
Can you tell me why can only run into the sane_get_devices() unless you
use *version =
Hello,
On Mar 28 18:40 Julien BLACHE wrote (shortened):
... I think it'd really be better to have the
frontends be entirely isolated from the backends, as I explained
already.
This would provide a central point (saned) handling the hardware
entirely
To avoid confusion with the cupsd, I
Hello,
On Mar 28 22:49 Julien BLACHE wrote:
Till Kamppeter till.kamppeter at gmail.com wrote:
ago and no one answered). This will help us that it is much easier for
scanner manufacturers to ship drivers with their scanners. They can
This is all but a good thing. Currently, binary
Hello,
On Mar 28 19:13 Julien BLACHE wrote (shortened):
... provide a central point (saned) handling the hardware
entirely,
...
Something much more simple than CUPS, but yeah, basically.
...
Oh, I forgot to add: we get real locking/device management
that way, too.
It may get complicated
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hi,
The CUPS backend runs only as long as one particular print job
is sent to the device, then it finishes.
Same for saned.
But how to deal with a user who runs a frontend to scan
multiple sheets on a all-in-one device and in between
a (longer)
pr?nom.nom at laposte.net
1 Go d'espace de stockage, anti-spam et anti-virus int?gr?s.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080401/e3450454/attachment.htm
On 4/1/08, Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org writes:
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
For example the epkowa driver from IScan is free software.
No, epkowa is not free software. A large part of the scanners it
supports
Hi,
Now tell me, how do you transparently share scanners from one box to
another without a daemon?
I never said that. I said ? how to avoid running service if there is no
scanner plugged ? ?. I even implemented a daemon for polling sensor.
Please reread past mail rather than putting words in
10 matches
Mail list logo
