Hello,
No progress on 2400dpi. DPIHW is 2400 and dpiset 600 for a 300dpi scan.
Don't know where to look yet for that problem !
about byte nibbles modifying reg_0x79 from 0x3f to 0x3e (very few
contrasted image) or 0x40(black image) gives me bad images !!!
What is effect of this register on
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
Hello,
In genesys backend, we can find :
typedef struct
{
u_int8_t reg[4];
u_int8_t sign[3];
u_int8_t offset[3];
u_int8_t gain[3];
u_int8_t reg2[3];
} Genesys_Frontend;
but in WM8199 regs don't have the same name.
For me registers
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
Hello,
Is there a possibility to determine a maximum of parameter like :
typedef struct
{
int optical_res; (OK, for me 2400)
int black_pixels;(don't know how to determine)
int dummy_pixel; (content of 0x34 ?)
int
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
Hello,
No progress on 2400dpi. DPIHW is 2400 and dpiset 600 for a 300dpi scan.
Don't know where to look yet for that problem !
I'd try to get a log from a 2400dpi scan from windows and compare.
about byte nibbles modifying reg_0x79 from 0x3f to 0x3e (very few
well, it appears that the sanei_usb support library intentionally does
not re-gather the list of devices. This makes sense in the average
sane installation, cause dozens of backends each gather the list
within a fraction of a second, as the dll backend cycles thru them.
in your case, it is the
man sane-usb
you need to change perms in /proc/bus/usb/ or in /dev/bus/usb, these
are usually manage by udev.
allan
On 4/25/08, Marc Shapiro mshapiro_42 at yahoo.com wrote:
I recently purchased an EPSON CX7400 All-In-One and it prints and copies
great. Scanning has been a problem. I am
Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2008 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hi,
Be careful with the labels you use. Always use a unique label name, or
you're asking for troubles. (been there, done that, accidentally
rendered a number of systems unbootable due to
Rainer Dorsch rdorsch at web.de wrote:
Hi,
The script works now reasonably robust (for now) when I plug the USB scanner.
My problem is though, that the script does not get called when I boot the
system and the scanner is plugged already during bootup. Why is this?
Chances are the
:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080426/82a6b921/attachment-0001.htm
On 4/26/08, Francisco Miguel Felix Santini fesm788m at gmail.com wrote:
May be this can help:
Is sane-backend installed at /usr or /usr/local/. I ask you this, because
it appears that libusb is installed at /usr and sane-backend doesn't or
viceversa. I mean Sane Backend is not using all of
10 matches
Mail list logo
