If you could provide the exact versions of sane-backends and
sane-frontends you are using, that would be more useful.
I have a Canon CanoScan LiDE 220 sitting right next to me and it is
functioning quite well (I'm using scanimage to drive it).
Try running
$ scanimage -d genesys --format=tiff
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index 77c22883..0f71422c 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#include
@am__quote@
diff --git a/frontend/sicc.c b/frontend/sicc.c
new file mode 100644
index ..21d600d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/frontend/sicc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/* Load an ICC profile for embedding in an output file
+ Copyright (C) 2017 Aaron Muir Hamilton <aa...@correspondwith.me>
+
+ This p
If the ICC profile added does not match the colour format of the
image, libpng will abort. This can leave the scanner motors in an
incorrect state and possibly cause permanent damage.
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 22 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index 77c2288..d719c4b 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -1529,6 +1529,19 @@ scan_it (FILE *ofp)
for(j =
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index 77c2288..0925039 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -1529,6 +1529,19 @@ scan_it (FILE *ofp)
for(j =
Sorry about the volume, third time is definitely the charm.
Admittedly I struggled to grasp the style rules.
I noticed the PNG byte order issue fixed by this patch when using
genesys with a CanoScan LiDE 220. I do not have any other supported
scanners close at hand, so I hope somebody can confirm
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 15 ---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index 77c2288..432c2ea 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -1165,9 +1165,12 @@ write_pnm_header (SANE_Frame
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index 77c2288..0f71422 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#include "../include/sane/sanei.h"
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index 77c2288..0f71422 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#include "../include/sane/sanei.h"
@
diff --git a/frontend/sicc.c b/frontend/sicc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..21d600d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/frontend/sicc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/* Load an ICC profile for embedding in an output file
+ Copyright (C) 2017 Aaron Muir Hamilton <aa...@correspondwith.me>
+
+ This program i
@
diff --git a/frontend/sicc.c b/frontend/sicc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..21d600d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/frontend/sicc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/* Load an ICC profile for embedding in an output file
+ Copyright (C) 2017 Aaron Muir Hamilton <aa...@correspondwith.me>
+
+ This program i
Pleased to make your acquaintance, Olaf.
Thank you for reviewing the patches and taking them upstream,
I have an equivalent patch for JPEG output on the boil.
Not to put you on the spot, but it seems like a lot of time has passed
since the last release was tagged, despite there apparently being
> Yeah!
> But then we the solution?! Command line?
> It Xsane is not developed?
XSane is a separate project. It's not part of sane-backends or
sane-frontends. I have no idea whether or not it's still developed.
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
atus = sanei_genesys_get_status (dev, );
664 };
Pay close attention to the semicolons.
As an aside, this is probably why the 1TBS is superiour to GNU-style.
Aaron Muir Hamilton <aa...@correspondwith.me> writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen <paddy-h...@member.fsf.org> writes:
>
>> Hi
Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a while since my last janitorial. Interest in contributing to
> the project comes in waves. I've been preoccupied with the preparations
> for the 1.0.27 release. During which, Aaron made a suggestion about how
> coding
---
frontend/scanimage.c | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/scanimage.c b/frontend/scanimage.c
index ffb9f105..e5562815 100644
--- a/frontend/scanimage.c
+++ b/frontend/scanimage.c
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ write_png_header (SANE_Frame format,
h 8- and 16-bit modes
correctly, it should also work with the other libpng grayscale modes.
> If that works fine, I'll push your patches with two fixes after merging
> against master.
>
> Aaron Muir Hamilton writes:
>
> > If the ICC profile added does not match the colour format o
I just tried it by hacking scanimage up a bit to threshhold and convert
the lines to monochrome right before writing the PNG, and change the PNG
header to always be 1-bit; libpng didn't complain about attaching a
grayscale profile to a 1-bit monochrome image.
--
sane-devel mailing list:
Which part are you having trouble with? Do you know how the exposure
tables work, but don't know how to expose an option, or the other way
around?
Happy hacking.
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Hmm, can confirm, it scans some portion of the image and then hangs. I
think the official software on Windows doesn't support full-page scans
at 2400dpi or greater. It does work if you limit the scan to an area.
Not sure what should be done about this, I don't think there's a
standard way to
21 matches
Mail list logo