On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote:
On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to
3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6
that was me. But it's not quite clear. got also some
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 10:24:51 Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
Gerhard Jaeger schrieb:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote:
On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to
3.0.5, as someone
, (0x6b) need to write to undefined
gamma addresses (0x5b/5c - 0x0c00). Thats really magic. Both areas
are defined for GL843 but not for GL841/2.
Indeed, very strange.
@Gerhard Jaeger: Were did you get the bcdValues from? Can we trust them?
Yup, we can. Got that from the sources of a Windoze
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:37:06 Alessandro Zummo wrote:
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 @ 10:37:06
Author: azummo-guest
Path: /cvsroot/sane/sane-backends
Modified: configure configure.in include/sane/sane.h
configure, configure.in, include/sanei.h: bumped version
number
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 12:22:40 Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:59:15 +0100
Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote:
Hi,
in general I have no objections about moving forward, but
has the branch in CVS been done?
What I'd like to see is at least having
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 13:56:47 Sergey Vlasov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 12:22:40 Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:59:15 +0100
Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote:
Hi
On Monday 25 February 2008 16:25:24 stef wrote:
Le Monday 25 February 2008 07:58:49 Gerhard Jaeger, vous avez ?crit?:
Hi list, hi Pierre,
I revived my Plustek ST24 device and tried to make it work
with the genesys backend. I managed to get out some picture, BUT:
- any resolution
On Sunday 22 June 2008 21:58:48 litlle girl wrote:
Hi all,
this is my first post :)
I have Plustek OpticPro UT12 usb scanner marked as Unsupported and it works
with x-sane/sane at line/gray/RGB up to 1200dpi.
Please add it to supported list http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html
and
Hi,
On Freitag, 27. Juni 2008, litlle girl wrote:
Hi guyz,
i recognize that win drivers dont calibrate my CIS scanner before scan.
Most probably it will calibrate. Right after installation of the drivers,
you'll be asked to insert a white calibration paper with black marks on
it. Then it
Hi Jack,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 18:07:38 Jack McGill wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Pentax DS Mobile: This is supposedly the same as the syscan Travelscan
Pro 2300. I won a lot of 10 of these on ebay and I expect that at least
one will work. This has a LM9832/3 chip and should be adaptable to the
On Sunday 21 September 2008 14:45:26 m. allan noah wrote:
perhaps the backend author will have a suggestion?
Probably not - sorry!
Just one thing: which SANE version are you using?
- Gerhard
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 15:14:02 Y P wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:55:11PM +, g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Y P wrote:
I added myself to the group scanner but it doesn't seem to resolve the
is re-logging system or reboot required for
On Friday 24 October 2008 13:23:00 Labrador wrote:
Hi,
I just like to know if there still is a danger for causing dammages to a
CanoScan LiDE20 / 25 if the reso for color mode is set to a higher rate than
50 or 70 or so?
what's the max. reso authorized for Color now?
Why do you think so -
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 16:15:07 Dave Morris wrote:
i need help to install a driver for my canon lide30 scanner..i have
found the link to get the driver but do not know how to install..i have
ubuntu,kubuntu
i am using kde and gnome desktop..
i have been using my xsane scanner on comp but
Hi Jack,
On Thursday 30 October 2008 19:53:46 John McGill wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Your email inspired me to keep going. I have made some progress on the DS
Mobile.
(I will wait to work on my TravelScanPro 600 until after I learn how to get
this one working).
good to hear that ;)
Based on
On Friday 04 July 2008 06:46:53 JACK MCGILL wrote:
I am a new Linux user and found the following while researching my
Visioneer RoadWarrior Scanner.
You might find this interesting. Perhaps this scanner could be easily
added to the sane-Plustek backend.
Hi Jack,
thanks for the pointers and
On Sunday 06 July 2008 23:01:42 JACK MCGILL wrote:
Gerhard,
If can get one on your desk, would you be willing to work on it?
Sure.
- Gerhard
On Monday 14 July 2008 13:28:18 litlle girl wrote:
The plustek-backend is able to store calibration data and to
read them back before scanning. This backend (and probably most
others also) needs the value from coarse calibration (the AFE stuff)
and the fine calibration (for each sensor
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 02:41:14 m. allan noah wrote:
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 @ 01:41:14
Author: kitno-guest
Path: /cvsroot/sane/sane-backends
Modified: ChangeLog doc/descriptions-external/brother2.desc
include/sane/sanei_thread.h sanei/sanei_thread.c
add
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 14:22:01 Jack McGill wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Also, I made a table that summarizes the small, usb powered, mobile sheetfed
scanners at
http://sites.google.com/site/roadwarriorscanner/sheetfed-scanner.
Jack,
I can confirm that the Scanshell 800 is LM98xx based, the IDs are:
On Monday 27 April 2009 20:38:43 m. allan noah wrote:
Gerhard- 112 lines of changes to Changelog? Switching the file to UTF?
Damn, probably yes - sorry. Will revert.
Gerhard
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 18:12:10 Julien BLACHE wrote:
Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote:
Hi,
Gerhard- 112 lines of changes to Changelog? Switching the file to UTF?
Damn, probably yes - sorry. Will revert.
Did so already :)
okay - thanks.
- Gerhard
Hi,
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 10:51:38 Marcus Shaw wrote:
[...]
I just bought a TravelScan 464, which is a small, portable scanner.
It works fine so far, the only problem:
It pulls the page in twice; The first time it justs feeds it trough,
then the second time the actual scan starts.
Is
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 14:59:04 Stuckey wrote:
Package: xsane
Version: 0.996-3
My preview window looks like this: http://jhstuckey.com/Screenshot-4.png
So what? What did the scanner do? Does the scanhead move?
- Gerhard
Hi Oskar,
Am Dienstag, 7. September 2010, 12:29:07 schrieb Oskar Schirmer:
Trying to get the plustek 9636T work
on an Ubuntu 10.04 500MHz x86 installation,
but it fails during detection. With
export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK_PP=255 set,
scanimage run with root permissions says:
[...]
Hi Johann,
great to her from you!
First of all the whole backend is based on code I got from
Plustek, therefore it's sometimes not really clear what they've
done. Esp. the differences between the originally supported devices
are hardcoded by using CCD-type, PCD-id and motor type...
Anyway.
Hi,
what about running the stuff as root?
Check the access rights!
Gerhard
On Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 15:27, Ryan Budge wrote:
Hi all.
Well im fighting it out still.
1.=09I recompiled my kernel and took out the uscanner driver.
2.=09On boot I get the scanner found by ugen0
It seems so!
Check scanimage mapage for the parameters, if called
without parameter, the backend uses the internal defaults...
Gerhard
On Dienstag, 26. November 2002 13:35, John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I use the actual version of sane 1.0.9!!
the scanner is run to the middle, stoped an comes back.
I
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 28. November 2002 16:29, Marcel Oliver wrote:
Hi, I have just bought an Epson Perfection 1260 scanner, primarily
because Epson makes an explicit effort to support their hardware on
Linux.
The scanner mostly works, but I have a few minor problems:
- When using the
Hi,
I know ive read if the scanner is gone through the whole scan and makes
a weird noise at the end like its still going to turn it off immediately
which i did.
i am using canoscan n650u usb scanner, and first im using a C script
found off http://www.linuxcompatible.org/compdet.php?id=3D10346
Hi,
as you're using the 0.40version with SANE-backends 1.0.9, I expect a
version conflict! Use the latest module 0.42.
Simply unpack this one, recompile, reinstall and reload it, then the old =
one
will be removed automatically...
Gerhard
On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2003 23:39, Ernie Schroder wrote:
What are the vendor and product ids?
You might use Hennings checkscanner utility to check for the
chipset, if it is a LM983x one, we might can use the Plustek backend
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/check-usb-scanner/
use at least v8
Gerhard
On Donnerstag, 6. M=E4rz 2003 16:41,
Hi Richard,
as Henning already suggested, please use the latest version. There
your problems are solved:
- lamp switching is fixed
- UMAX 3400 works correctly
1.0.8 has only a bad 3400 support based on lot of assuptions...
Another thing:
The buttons of these devices are in general not supported.
Hi Lucas from Brazil,
you're welcome to write a driver ;-)
I think we will find more and more cheap scanner that use the same chipse=
t
as your HR7X slim - it's the GeneSys Logic GL646 scanner controller.
As we currently have no support for this chip, we're looking for somebody
that will do this
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 23:16, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
[sanei_usb] sanei_usb_open: opened usb device
`libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0' (*dn=3D0) [sanei_usb]
-- this is the correct device name for this system, as open works!?
I'm not sure if that works, but you could
On Dienstag, 28. Januar 2003 18:34, Zeus wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
P: Vendor=3D06dc ProdID=3D0014 Rev=3D 1.00
S: Manufacturer=3DF.I.T.
S: Product=3DUSB Scanner
S: SerialNumber=3DRTS8801C2-006
I allready contact Prolink, and asking is there any chances their
scanner will works on Linux.
Hi,
sorry, I didn't notice, that it might be Plustek backend related problem=
!
Well, I aggree with Henning:=20
Try and update your kernel, there are some reports that there are problem=
s
with older USB subsystem implementations, that way, that you have to repl=
ug
the scanner, when the system
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 22:17, Till Kamppeter wrote:
David Faure wrote:
The most annoying thing for end users is that the /dev devices don't
exist (on a Mandrake 9.0), I had to mknod for /dev/pt_drv and
/dev/usbscanner... But really: great job. I was not expecting the usb
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 10:51, scott fagg wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
plustek + hp2200c works ok for random resolutions for me. Is it a funct=
ion
of how much is scanned or how much data needs to be transfered ?=20
Yes - in general all scanners support various fixed resolutions, which
can be
Hi,
On Thursday 23 January 2003 11:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
Is everyone noticing a delay in sane-devel email arriving or is it
just me? Mails send to the list arrive at mostang.com pretty quick
(seconds to minutes) and show up in the archive. But they take up
to 15 hours to
Hi,
On Montag, 3. Februar 2003 09:29, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Is this typical for a lm983x scanner:
-- NO
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 7 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=0461 ProdID=0347 Rev= 0.04
S:
Interesting question, as nothing has changed from 1.0.10 to 1.0.11
from the Plustek backend point of view...
Can you pin down the problem more precisesly?
Gerhard
On Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2003 22:53, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
I have a Canon CanoScan N1220U. It hasn't worked with SANE until
Hi,
first you should find out why the Plustek backend refuses to work!
There are at least two points:
- make sure that the backend can access the scanner device
- make sure to have appropriate device entries in the plustek-devs.c file
Then also decide how to access the scanner:
sane-find-scanner
On Mittwoch, 2. April 2003 11:36, Steven Lobbezoo wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
I'm working with Linux Suse 8.1 and sane 1.0.8-47 on a PC.
My scanner is a Epson Perfection 1260 (USB).
For the 1260 use ONLY Sane versions =3D 1.0.10, the 1.0.8 does not suppo=
rt
the 1260, 1.0.9 might kill the motor when
Hi,
what you observe here is the calibration routine which takes place on
each scan cycle. The clicks shouldn't appear so far - I'll cross check th=
is.
Gerhard
On Samstag, 12. April 2003 18:24, Steven Lobbezoo wrote:
I use Xsane to scan.
It's the time to get a scan, each time.
When I push
Hi Theodore,
I'm not sure that the Artec 1236 contains a LM983x chipset. I got this
information from the National Semiconductor Driver sources, where there
are some settings for this scanner, but up to now, I've not seen this
device...
The check for the chipset, you might download the
Hi,
the only thing to do for the 656 is:
use the latest SANE version (1.0.9) and update with plustek-sane-0.45TEST=
3
for better picture quality.
pt_drv is the Kernelmode Driver for Parallelport devices and not needed..=
=2E
Gerhard
Hi,
please update 1.0.9 with the plustek-sane-0.45TEST3 package from
www.gjaeger.de, this should fix the color problems.
Gerhard
On Montag, 2. Dezember 2002 04:33, deb...@mikekelland.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice to upgrade. I did so and, tada, she worked! Now
the problem I have is that
Hi,
here again, editing the plustek.conf file will do the trick ;-)
Check for the entry:
option lampOff 30
This controls the switch-off behaviour. A value of 0 means
don't switch off, any other value tells the backend to switch off
after xx seconds - here lampOff 60 menas switch off after one
Hi,
I've no idea what kind of device it is, but the SerialNumber
RTS8801B reminds me of a RealTek Chip RTL8801 which in fact
is a scanner chip. It is used in the low cost Plustek S6 device.
But there's currently no driver available nor source code or tech.
documentation
Bring the scanner
On Montag, 16. Dezember 2002 12:40, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
[SNIP]
Anyone is welcome to send me information on new models that are not
supported, and in particular patches to the page are very welcome.
At least no patch, but some info:
Plustek current USB models:
OpticPro1248: GrandTech
Yup,
one uses the LM9831 the other one the LM9832 that's the difference...
Seems to be Plustek policy: maximum user/programmer confusion by inconsistent
model naming ;-)
Gerhard
On Montag, 16. Dezember 2002 22:59, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:25:11PM +0100,
Hi,
On Monday 12 January 2004 20:56, Oliver Rauch wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
So I think you can't close the pipe in threads.
Bye,
Henning
I tried what happens when the pipe is closed when threads are used.
It is better to keep the pipe opened :)
indeed it is better ;-)
You should always keep
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 18:02, Christopher Marshall wrote:
allan:
I am using the CanonScan LiDE 30 with the plustek backend.
Chris
Then the contrast option manipulates the lut, as well as the brightness
option. The analog front end values are not touched.
Ciao,
Gerhard
On Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2003 23:54, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
I've currently added pthread support to the sanei_thread lib and chan=
ged
the Plustek backend, so that it will use threading instead of forking=
on
MacOS
Hi,
On Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2003 13:29, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
The limitation is that only one parameter can be used for the
forked/threaded process?
Yeap, that's life ;-)
No, I mean this is no real problem
Currently I see two things that has to be solved:
1.) the interface to
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
system-function will then be done in sanei_thread_begin.=20
-- int sanei_thread_begin( int(callback)(void*args), void *args)
Yes, that's ok I think. I've already thought about that because there
is no way to return a status with the
Hi,
On Thursday 09 October 2003 19:51, Beat Birkhofer wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
After quickhack-workarounding those errors it works. The reader process
starts, but obviously then something goes wrong, the app just hangs
after
[sanei_lm983x] sanei_lm983x_read: read 2556 bytes
[sanei_lm983x]
Hi there,
since yesterday I encountered problems in accessing the cvs on alioth,
where's the problem?
The message i got:=20
2437: ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remotehost
Any ideas?
Gerhard
Hi Franz,
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 17:06, Franz Bakan wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
No, why do you think so?
A). because otherwise I get errors in avision.c and mustek.c
there this function is defined static void.
I see, but this has to be fixed also by the maintainers. I wrote the dire=
ctly
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 22:31, k...@adept-hosting.net wrote:
Greetings!
I have a CanoScan LIDE 20 that I am trying to get to work with FreeBSD
5.1, SANE and XSANE. It is an USB scanner. I don't think this particula=
r
scanner is supported and I haven't so far found any references to it
Hi,
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 11:51, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
The mustek backend has now support for sanei_thread.=20
good work ;-)
At least on Linux, it does not work perfectly (cancelling leads to segf=
aults
sometimes).
As I stated in my former mails, when using
Hi,=20
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 17:30, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
The segafults appear to happen after exiting xsane only so it's not
that bad.
I'll see this here too when using xsane. Try and use xscanimage, there I'=
ll
never see this problem. Probably a xsane bug, I did not
On Sunday 15 January 2006 20:45, Andrew Barr wrote:
I am considering purchasing one of these, my LiDE 20 is broken and
apparently they don't sell those anymore. I notice that in the
compatibility list it's only good whereas the LiDE 20 is complete.
What is missing in terms of feature
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 17:11, Johannes Meixner wrote:
Hello,
buf[sizeof(buf)] is always out of range.
A customer reported the following out of range problem:
---
--- src/xscanimage.c.orig 2006-01-17
On Thursday 19 January 2006 17:27, Andrew Barr wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 08:24, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
[...]
As I already mentioned, I could not test anymore, but this looks like the
good old calibration problem. You might want to apply the attached patch
and try again.
My
On Monday 23 January 2006 21:29, Lauri Pirttiaho wrote:
Hello,
While writing the backend, I noticed so far only plustek
backend seems to employ sanei_access for locking the
device. Since in multi user systems it is possible
that accidentally someone else might try to access a
scanner in
On Monday 06 February 2006 10:06, shanthan Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a project on porting the SANE appliction code from Linux to WinCE,
I have the source code of this application.
I have seen some variables which I dont understand, can anyone please explain
me,
what their types would
us?
It seems Gerhard Jaeger had been able to get info from them, once...
JB
Hi,
I still have contact to Plustek and I also had to sign a NDA.
It's hard to get any technical information from Plustek
and for the OpticFilm you already got everything (except
for the Windoze driver sources) that you
Hi list,
I'm currently working on the support of a sheet-fed device
and this seem to work well up to the point where the calibration
stage needs to be done, as the calibration is equal to scanning
an extra calibration sheet...
It seems, that apart from the normal scan operation, I need a special
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 12:18, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
Without the attached patch the scanner:
Genius ColorPage Vivid III
don't work properly.
Vendor:0458
ProdID:2004
Thanks.
Jose Alberto
thanks for the patch, will be applied...
Gerhard
On Monday 20 February 2006 20:40, kriko wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
-
However, I can scan as root (xsane, kooka...). Is this permission issue?
What permission should I set to scanner device and how.
I'm using suse 10.
Check this out:
On Sunday 19 February 2006 19:28, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
Please apply attached patch for lockdir:
Changelog:
Add --with-lockdir to configure for set path to lock dir
Set PATH_SANE_LOCK_DIR really to lock dir (instead localstatedir)
P.S.
I left default lock dir, but I guess /var/lock/sane
Hi,
from what I see from the logs everything looks fine! The scanner is detected
but the backend refuses to open the device node.
Did you start scanimage -L as user or root?
Gerhard
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 17:56, v...@chatcircuit.com wrote:
Hi,
Well, I bought myself a Thumbdrive so I
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 15:50, v...@chatcircuit.com wrote:
those logs are from root. I looked at my kernel. I have all the usb stuff
compiled into the kernel. I have usbfs compiled. I'm guessing it is a problem
with udev. I ran the knoppix cd last night, hotplug creates /dev/usbscanner
and
Well in general I'd say this is related to the locking feature,
but as you're using sane-backends-1.0.15 (did you?)
Then this feature is not available.
No more ideas on that - sorry
Gerhard
On Thursday 02 March 2006 17:25, v...@chatcircuit.com wrote:
Hi,
/dev/usbscanner might be fine, but
On Thursday 02 March 2006 13:06, Ren? Rebe wrote:
Hi all - again,
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 22:53, Ren? Rebe wrote:
Hi all,
I currently review how to further improve the SANE/Avision backend to
get to the scanners maximal thruput, e.g. what the Windows driver
get's out of those
On Sunday 12 March 2006 00:02, Jeff Blank wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:59:07PM -0500, Jeff Blank wrote:
I'm having problems getting my LiDE25 to work under FreeBSD 6.
Problem solved, apparently. I was running a late 6.0-STABLE (from
just before RELENG_6 became 6.1-PRERELEASE), and
On Saturday 11 March 2006 22:30, Lauri Pirttiaho wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Now, if you decide to try the code, and find problems
with it, drop me a note. I won't correct everything
immediately, but I will make notes of all known
issues to take care of later, when all the basic
functionality is in.
On Sunday 30 April 2006 10:28, Florian Otto wrote:
Hi
i connected two scanner to my linux computer. but scanimage -L only detecs
one.
server:~# lsusb
Bus 004 Device 001: ID :
Bus 003 Device 001: ID :
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04a9:220d Canon, Inc. CanoScan N670U/N676U/LiDE 20
On Sunday 14 May 2006 19:26, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
Hello,
I tried downloading the sources for the SANE frontends and backends
from http://www.sane-project.org/source.html. Then compiled and
installed them under Fedora Core 5, ran scanimage, and my scanner (a
CanoScan LiDE20 USB) jammed
On Monday 15 May 2006 09:29, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
2006/5/15, Gerhard Jaeger gerh...@gjaeger.de:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 19:26, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
Hello,
I tried downloading the sources for the SANE frontends and backends
from http://www.sane-project.org/source.html
Well, I have two problems in reverting the changes:
- there are with one small exception no diffs in the LiDE20
parametersets between 1.0.17 and 1.0.16
- I only have a N670U for testing, which should be the same device
as the LiDE20, but I could not detect any problems :(
Well I also got one
On Saturday 20 May 2006 23:50, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
2006/5/20, Gerhard Jaeger gerh...@gjaeger.de:
Well, I have two problems in reverting the changes:
- there are with one small exception no diffs in the LiDE20
parametersets between 1.0.17 and 1.0.16
- I only have a N670U
On Friday 26 May 2006 15:17, Petar Mijatovic wrote:
Hello together,
to install the new plustek backend for my scanner CanoScan LiDE25 I try
to install the new libusb which is recomanded for linux
kernel = 2.6.
There are problems with the installing of libusb discribed in the
enclosed
Hi list,
prior to feature freeze, I've updated the Plustek
backend. The major benefits from that version are:
- generic support for CIS based sheetfed devices
- support of Syscan Travelscan662 sheetfet scanner
- support of offline calibration for CIS based
devices (CanoScan), so that there's no
On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:40, Craig wrote:
Hi.
I've been trying without success for a while now, to get this USB
scanner working on OpenBSD 3.9 and previously 3.8, using
sane-backends-1.0.17 and previously 1.0.16
sane-find-scanner reports:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon],
On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:49, Marc Freitag wrote:
Hi,
I have a Canoscan Lide 30 which used to work just fine with SANE under
Linux. But I had to change my GNU/Linux laptop for a PowerBook and now
things are getting more complex... First, the Canon doesn't provide a
Twain driver but only
On Monday 10 July 2006 21:40, m. allan noah wrote:
recent model fujitsu scanners dont have native brightness/contrast/gamma
support, instead they use an 256x256 or 1024x256 bit look up table to
convert the raw scan data before 8 bit output.
while it is true that the 8bit square LUT could
On Thursday 20 July 2006 17:35, Immanuel CRC Office wrote:
I have an HP 1200 Laser Jet printer and Plustek OpticPro 9636P+ scanner.
(scanner is supported by backends)
The scanner is connect first to the parallel port, and then the printer
is connected to the scanner.
The printer works
On Sunday 23 July 2006 14:39, Dimitrios Bogiatzoules wrote:
Hi all,
I hope I'm not rehashing an old story but I hadn't any success after
searching the net for a solution.
it's indeed an old story...
[SNIPSNAP]
I'd appreciate any comment, patch or help in order to get my scanner
working.
On Thursday 03 August 2006 16:51, Immanuel CRC Office wrote:
Okay, so I'm getting somewhere.
Plustek OpticPro 9639P+, parallel port
using plustek_pp backend.
I have to run all as root so far.
scanimage -L gives:
device `plustek_pp:parport0' is a Plustek 9636P+/Turbo parallel port
Hi,
On Friday 04 August 2006 21:02, Immanuel CRC Office wrote:
m. allan noah wrote:
man sane-plustek_pp
allan
That's where I got the info from that I pasted. So I tried it and it
worked. The lamp turns off after 1 min, and when I close Kooka/Xsane.
But why are the defaults
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 17:28, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
I own a flatbed scanner Canon CanoScan N1220U. The device name is
plustek:libusb:002:002. I find some bug in that backend or at least in
that device support.
* The product name is N1220U instead of CanoScan N1220U
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:55, Parag N() wrote:
Hi,
On 8/9/06, Johannes Meixner jsm...@suse.de wrote:
Hello,
On Aug 9 13:03 Parag N() wrote (shortened):
With reference to Johannes Meixner's mail to this mailing list
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 13:49, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
scanimage -L reports:
device `plustek:libusb:003:003' is a Canon N1220U USB flatbed scanner
User should have
bersace@celebrad:~$ scanimage -L
device `plustek:libusb:002:002' is a Canon CanoScan N1220U
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 15:20, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
SANE standard 1 does not specify how to handle scanner buttons,
but it is clear, that an option, which deals with a button has to deliver
a value (button pressed or not). Regarding that requirement, you have either
to use
On Friday 18 August 2006 12:40, Simon Troup wrote:
Hi
my scanner is a Canon Lide 50, I'm on OSX 10.4. Sscanimage is returning
this ...
device `plustek:libusb:005:003-04a9-220e-ff-00' is a Canon N1240U/LiDE30
USB flatbed scanner
ah, interesting ;) didn't know that so far...
does it work
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:31, Flavio Lopes wrote:
Hi,
From the sane-backend 1.0.17 version to 1.0.18, I have a small problem
with my scanner plustek p12. Although it scans images correctly, the
carriage of the scanner does not return, after scan or pre-scan. This
is truth as for
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 08:05, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:31, Flavio Lopes wrote:
Hi,
From the sane-backend 1.0.17 version to 1.0.18, I have a small problem
with my scanner plustek p12. Although it scans images correctly, the
carriage of the scanner
1 - 100 of 425 matches
Mail list logo
