On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:57:29 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
Why an 1.1 COMPLIANT frontend should be allowed to compile against 1.0
SANE?
I've never seen in my whole life any other library that has such
a requirement. When the library version changes, you have to
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
Hi,
By declaring that you are sane 1.1 compliant you, the programmer,
are telling your users that you have put your efforts into making your
code robust, to check and handle error codes.
I got lost in what you're proposing to use a the
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:10:11 +0100
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
Hi,
By declaring that you are sane 1.1 compliant you, the programmer,
are telling your users that you have put your efforts into making your
code robust,
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it writes:
please see the attached patch regarding my proposal
for a safe enabling of 1.1 features in the backends.
[snip]
--- sane-backends.orig/include/sane/sane.h2008-02-26 00:07:40.0
+0100
+++ sane-backends/include/sane/sane.h
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:43:26 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it writes:
please see the attached patch regarding my proposal
for a safe enabling of 1.1 features in the backends.
Hmm, the SANE Standard Version 1.03
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Alessandro Zummo
azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:43:26 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it writes:
please see the attached patch regarding my proposal
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:28:59 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
in the fujitsu backend, i previously had added a 'compression' option
with the description warning of possible front-end incompatibility,
and the default setting to not compress. i feel this is sufficient,
because
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Alessandro Zummo
azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:28:59 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
in the fujitsu backend, i previously had added a 'compression' option
with the description warning of possible front-end
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:03:23 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
Hi do not agree here. I'd like for both backends and frontends to
be well-written. This is the whole point and I believe it
is perfectly reasonable.
but nothing about my suggestion will prevent authors
resend to list- sorry alessandro-
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:47 PM, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Alessandro Zummo
azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:03:23 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:48:51 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
but nothing about my suggestion will prevent authors from writing
good code :)
but you are not going to induce them to do so :)
and neither are you :)
I would, trust me, I would.. :-D
On 2/28/08, Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
The fact that the code exists do not make it less ugly.
ah- it might not be perfect, but it MUST continue to exist, so lets
use it instead of adding a new interface, and requiring authors that
want their
On 2/28/08, Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:57:29 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
Why an 1.1 COMPLIANT frontend should be allowed to compile against 1.0
SANE?
I've never seen in my whole life any other library that
On 2/28/08, Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
With your repeated requests to make other API changes, and your
willingness to write code, how about we bite this bullet and re-open
the discussion about building a new, simpler sane2?
because I don't want to discuss, I
Hi folks,
please see the attached patch regarding my proposal
for a safe enabling of 1.1 features in the backends.
I've included a few small docs, checked some drivers
for the correct behaviour and added 1.1 features
to the coolscan3 driver.
The basic points of my proposal are:
a)
15 matches
Mail list logo
