[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-13 Thread Reinhard Biegel
On Tuesday, 12. February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: Register 0x6b is very different between GL841/2 and GL843. But the documentation around the pins controlled with 0x6b is a bit lacking. So we need to write reserved I/O bits, (0x6b) need to write to undefined gamma addresses (0x5b/5c -

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-13 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Stefan Lucke schrieb: On Monday 11 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Reinhard Biegel schrieb: Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: At that moment, I guess you'll see messages like: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address nn via dmesg. Hi, Yes, thats

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-13 Thread Stefan Lucke
Quoting Pierre Willenbrock pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org: Stefan Lucke schrieb: On Monday 11 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Reinhard Biegel schrieb: Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: At that moment, I guess you'll see messages like: new high speed USB

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-13 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 15:42:12 Reinhard Biegel wrote: On Tuesday, 12. February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: Register 0x6b is very different between GL841/2 and GL843. But the documentation around the pins controlled with 0x6b is a bit lacking. So we need to write reserved I/O bits,

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-12 Thread Reinhard Biegel
On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to 3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6 bcdDevice of mine is 0302. Reinhard

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-12 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote: On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to 3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6 that was me. But it's not quite clear. got also some

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-12 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Gerhard Jaeger schrieb: On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote: On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to 3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6 that was me. But it's not quite

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-12 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Monday 11 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Reinhard Biegel schrieb: Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: At that moment, I guess you'll see messages like: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address nn via dmesg. Hi, Yes, thats right.

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-12 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 10:24:51 Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Gerhard Jaeger schrieb: On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote: On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to 3.0.5, as someone

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-11 Thread Reinhard Biegel
You are talking about writes like: I guess YES. Yes, I do. Now I found the right one AND the right time: Before doing the reset ;-). So now I've the initial motor movement with LED blinking and a scan movement with green LED. But no (strange) data arrives. I tried your diff, but I

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-11 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Monday 11 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote: You are talking about writes like: I guess YES. Yes, I do. Now I found the right one AND the right time: Before doing the reset ;-). So now I've the initial motor movement with LED blinking and a scan movement with green LED.

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-11 Thread Reinhard Biegel
Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: ... [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6b] = 0x02 [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6e] = 0x6d [genesys_gl841] gl841_bulk_write_register: failed while writing command: Invalid argument scanimage: open of device genesys:libusb:001:010 failed: Invalid

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-11 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Reinhard Biegel schrieb: Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: ... [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6b] = 0x02 [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6e] = 0x6d [genesys_gl841] gl841_bulk_write_register: failed while writing command: Invalid argument scanimage: open of device

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-10 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Saturday 09 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: On Friday 08 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote: Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Reinhard Biegel: Ohi just remember there was something that had to be called at any price but didn't find any documentation about that. I'm going

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-09 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Friday 08 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote: Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Reinhard Biegel: Ohi just remember there was something that had to be called at any price but didn't find any documentation about that. I'm going to look for that in my logs. Hi again, I

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: Hi, I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too. I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry -- scanimage with debug messages : -- [sanei_debug] Setting

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Reinhard Biegel
Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: Even with turned off LED and some motor sound (movement in the wrong direction ??), scanimage produced some pnm files. To be continued, but I really need some help, as I've no idea about scanner hardware. Hi, I played around some time

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Hi Stefan, (more text inline) Stefan Lucke schrieb: On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: Hi, I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too. I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry --

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote: Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: Even with turned off LED and some motor sound (movement in the wrong direction ??), scanimage produced some pnm files. To be continued, but I really need some help, as I've no idea

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Hi Stefan, (more text inline) Stefan Lucke schrieb: On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: Hi, I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and like to ask if there could be done something for

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Reinhard Biegel
Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke: Do you have some old sources of your changes ? Playing with motor settings doesn't make a difference (at the moment). Sorry, I trashed the sources because I messed something up and then nothing was working any more. I planed to start over

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-06 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Stefan Lucke schrieb: On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: Hi Stefan, (more text inline) Stefan Lucke schrieb: On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: Hi, I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and like to ask if there could be

[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 80 (2nd try)

2008-02-05 Thread Stefan Lucke
Hi, I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too. I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry -- scanimage with debug messages : -- [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of genesys to 255. [genesys] SANE Genesys