Tengo un scanner Cannon Lide 60
como root, xsane identifica el scanner
como usuario, xsane no identifica el scanner.
He probado crear un grupo con permisos para xsane,
pero tampoco identifica el scanner.
?Como puedo hacer para que xsane identifique el scanner en modo usuario
People,
I have been using an LiDE 20 satisfactorily for a while but waiting till
the driver for the LiDE 60 was going. From the postings it seems that
the 60 driver is now working OK and so I have switched over.
The scan options interface is slightly different for the 60 - for
example I have
Roger,
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:57 +0200, Roger Price wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Philip Rhoades wrote:
... it appears that I am now forced into using one of: 75, 150, 300,
600, 1200 or 2400 . . is there some way to change this so I can use my
traditional resolutions?
From xsane's
Hi
Bought a brand new Canon LIDE 60 and installed it in Debian Sarge.
To get it working, had to add these lines
IN
/etc/sane.d/hotplug/libsane.db
ADDED
# Canon Inc.|LIDE 60
0x04a9 0x221c root:scanner0664
IN
/etc/udev/libsane.rules
ADDED
# Canon Inc.|LIDE 60
SYSFS{idVendor}==04a9,
Le Dimanche 5 F?vrier 2006 12:18, CSORDAS Laszlo a ?crit?:
Canon Lide 60 working with backend MEDION MD5345 (genesys) :-)))
-destitute 4 speed button-
csola
Hello,
did you configure anything or did it work 'out of the box' ?
Regards,
Stef
St?phane VOLTZ wrote:
Le Dimanche 5 F?vrier 2006 12:18, CSORDAS Laszlo a ?crit :
did you configure anything or did it work 'out of the box' ?
Regards,
Stef
Nothing... ran at sight :-)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
On 2006-01-02 21:05, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
(gdb) run --mode Color image.pnm 2log
Starting program: /usr/bin/scanimage --mode Color image.pnm 2log
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1076312288 (LWP 19858)]
Program exited normally.
Ok, so there is no
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:19:24 +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz
henn...@meier-geinitz.de wrote:
Starting program: /usr/X11R6/bin/xsane image.pnm 2log
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1086061088 (LWP 20069)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching
Hi,
first of all: The scanner works when I connect the PCMCIA-USB adapter to
the AC/DC adapter -- Thanks much for this hint!
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:13:26 +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz
henn...@meier-geinitz.de wrote:
Hi,
On 2005-12-31 15:48, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
my answers
Hi,
On 2005-12-29 23:41, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
4. Color/8bit
-
All resolutions work. 1200 and 2400 are very slow ( 15 minutes per page)
Did you test this at a USB 2 port? Iget approximately 6 minutes at
2400 dpi and 3 minutes at 1200 dpi.
5. Color/16bit
Hi,
On 2005-12-31 15:48, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
my answers are inserted below:
Your mail wasn't accepted by the list because it's just too big. I'll
quote the important stuff so you don't need to resend it.
Can we have a log file and gdb trace as mentioned in the article,
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
Those corrupted horizontal lines are the result of a buffer overrun. I
thought i did setup the words per line parameter correctly, but
obviously i did not. In this case word seems to mean 1 byte while in
other contexts it
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:00:30AM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
sorry, I did not realize that there is a difference between current CVS
and experimental.
Are you really sure that you use experimental now? :-)
Some of your errors occur for me with the normal CVS, but not
Henning Meier-Geinitz schrieb:
I only get backtracking here with high load of the computer. However
I can confirm the horizontal lines. Looks like something connected to
backtracking at 16 bit doesn't fully work yet. I don't have
these lines in 8 bit mode.
Those corrupted horizontal
Hi everyone,
I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
(20051204-14:10). These are my results:
Lineart:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: freeze after 6 cm
Gray/8 bit
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: freeze after 4 cm
2400: freeze after 1.5 cm
Gray/16 bit
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
(20051204-14:10). These are my results:
Use the backend from experimental CVS. As mentioned in my success
report, that one works much better, at
Hi again,
sorry, I did not realize that there is a difference between current CVS
and experimental.
These are my results with the current experimental code:
Lineart:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: ok
gray/8bit:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: Error during read:
17 matches
Mail list logo
