On January 21 2005 00:46, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
[ . . . ] in general I suggest first to snoop the USB
traffic on the windoze box, analyse it and figure out the basic chip
settings for this scanner, then you should be save. It's some odd kinda
work, but I'm pretty sure there's no way without it
On January 18 2005 00:29, you wrote:
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23, Luke Campagnola wrote:
I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was
supported (I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and
rather than sending it back, I'm giving a go at writing
On Friday 21 January 2005 08:08, Luke Campagnola wrote:
On January 18 2005 00:29, you wrote:
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23, Luke Campagnola wrote:
I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was
supported (I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough),
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23, Luke Campagnola wrote:
I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was
supported
(I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and rather than
sending it back, I'm giving a go at writing the backend. I'm most of the way
I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was supported
(I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and rather than
sending it back, I'm giving a go at writing the backend. I'm most of the way
finished sorting out the differences between the gl646 and the
