hangs the SCSI bus. On the other hand the vuescan does a good job with
it (too bad it's not free and not open source).
Hm, vuescan is reasonably priced, has a user interface, supports it8
targets, process calibration and reasonably good infrared cleaning, and
most importantly, actually works...
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 14:27, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Most annoying that it doesn't work with SCSI scanners on 64bit machines,
something a recompile would fix. Hence my recent question about write()
encapsulation in sanei_scsi.c (which no-one replied to :( ).
I didn't answer because I'm not really
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
of creating (or extending) the SANE back-end?
See SANE website, section Contributing. See also the archive of this
mailing list for similar questions about writing backends.
OK, I'd like to try. Should I contact the manufacturer for protocol
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 14:17, Andrei V. Toutoukine wrote:
OK, I'd like to try. Should I contact the manufacturer for protocol
details or maybe someone has these already?
Asking is always a good idea. If they don't have a protocol
description, maybe they can give you the source code of the windows
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-01-08 14:27, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Most annoying that it doesn't work with SCSI scanners on 64bit machines,
something a recompile would fix. Hence my recent question about write()
encapsulation in sanei_scsi.c (which no-one replied to :( ).
I didn't
Dear SANE developers,
I've got six years old Microtek Film Scan 35 which nobody cares of at my
work. Unfortunately I seen the mark unsupported at SANE web site.
Small remark made me confused
[ http://www3.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html ] :
Hi,
On 2006-01-07 19:48, Andrei V. Toutoukine wrote:
What does Probably unsupported mean? Both links gave no hope of
course...
This means that someone told us that this scanner exists but there is
no obvious backend that could support it. But no in-depth analysis was
done, e.g. which chipset
