m. allan noah writes:
> I just pushed all of these. I did re-write the microtek2 patch to use
> the logic I pointed out in a prior mail.
Thanks. As usual by now, I've removed the pu/ branches from my clone.
I will follow up on the related bug reports as well.
Hope this helps,
--
Olaf
Yury Tarasievich writes:
> On 09/29/2015 04:25 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> I just pushed all of these. I did re-write the microtek2 patch to use
>> the logic I pointed out in a prior mail.
>
> /meaning sequenced `% 2` changed to sequenced '!'/
>
> Isn't this fancy-coding now, though?
>
> I didn't
On 09/29/2015 04:25 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
I just pushed all of these. I did re-write the microtek2 patch to use
the logic I pointed out in a prior mail.
/meaning sequenced `% 2` changed to sequenced '!'/
Isn't this fancy-coding now, though?
I didn't look in the backend and may have
Hi All(an),
I've pushed a few new Proposed Upgrades (PU) to my GitLab clone[1].
[1] https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/branches
I know that there are some restrictions on what can go in at this point
but I will leave that to the discretion of whomever merges them. Apart
from the first
I just pushed all of these. I did re-write the microtek2 patch to use
the logic I pointed out in a prior mail.
allan
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen
wrote:
> Hi All(an),
>
> I've pushed a few new Proposed Upgrades (PU) to my GitLab clone[1].
>
> [1]