I have the same scanner, and I am using it under Xsane-Ubuntu since 3
years. The developer Mustek it has a closed driver for linux:
I have the same scanner, and I am using it under Xsane-Ubuntu since 3
years. The developer Mustek it has a closed driver for linux:
HI!
I have the same scanner, and I am using it under Xsane-Ubuntu since 3
years. The developer Mustek it has a closed driver for linux:
Writing a device driver without help from the manufacturer is a
difficult, time consuming task. Its pretty rare for a programmer to
undertake such work for fun. Perhaps all these artists could get
together a bounty, and/or provide hardward to a developer, to
encourage the development. Or, find a
Indeed it is not an easy undertaking and a new (cheaper) A3 scanner could
be purchased for under ?100 so it's unlikely to warrant a massive move
towards crowd funding although it was a good plan.
I don't know of any sites to help crowdsource OSS, if this kind of thing
were to be put on kickstarter
2012/9/8, Harald Vajkonny vajkonny at t-online.de:
No ideas?
Am 30.08.2012 08:51, schrieb Harald Vajkonny:
I have a Mustek ScanExpress A3 USB 1200 Pro.
sane-find-scanner -q returns:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.],
product=0x040b [USB2.0 Scanner],
Hi, if this backend is written many artists of the below linked thread would
really appreciate a quick update to let them
know their scanners will once again work on Mountain Lion!
No ideas?
Am 30.08.2012 08:51, schrieb Harald Vajkonny:
Hi,
I have a Mustek ScanExpress A3 USB 1200 Pro.
sane-find-scanner -q returns:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.],
product=0x040b [USB2.0 Scanner], chip=SQ113) at
libusb:001:011
Is there any
Hi,
I have a Mustek ScanExpress A3 USB 1200 Pro.
sane-find-scanner -q returns:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.],
product=0x040b [USB2.0 Scanner], chip=SQ113) at libusb:001:011
Is there any chance to get it running with sane?
best regards,
harald
--
I am a newbie and am totally confused about how to install my Mustek
Scanexpress A3 USB on Ubuntu. Somebody help me please!
What are the steps I need to take?
Thanks,
Dave
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
m. allan noah @ 03/26/2010 11:53 AM:
btw, isn't sane-backends licensed under GPL? how can mustek provide a
package without the source?
3. They ship scanimage, sane-find-scanner, conf files etc, which are
covered only under the GPL, and do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/26/2010 10:03 PM:
scar @ 03/23/2010 12:34 PM:
linux packages mustek
provides[1]?
[snip]
if i installed it, i would have to use --force-architecture.
so, as long as i don't have anything else installed, their driver
works...
Le Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:21:35 +0900,
Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com a ?crit :
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar scar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/23/2010 12:34 PM:
surely there is something we can learn from the linux packages mustek
provides[1]?
actually, i am surprised to find that these drivers actually work,
contrary to what i previously read! guess we should give mustek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/25/2010 11:39 PM:
'sudo scanimage test.pnm' and indeed the test.pnm looks
just fine.
# export SANE_DEBUG=255
# export SANE_DEBUG_SANEI=255
# export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255
# export SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_USB2=255
# scanimage test.pnm
Le Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:39:17 -0700,
scar scar at drigon.com a ?crit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/23/2010 12:34 PM:
surely there is something we can learn from the linux packages
mustek provides[1]?
actually, i am surprised to find that these drivers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ille @ 03/26/2010 02:10 AM:
Le Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:39:17 -0700,
scar scar at drigon.com a ?crit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/23/2010 12:34 PM:
surely there is something we can learn from the linux packages
btw, isn't sane-backends licensed under GPL? ?how can mustek provide a
package without the source?
Clearly, a vendor can ship a clean-room proprietary sane backend, as
there are no restrictions on the implementation of the sane standard.
However, this particular case is more of a gray area:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ille @ 03/24/2010 12:39 AM:
Le Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:11:18 -0700,
scar scar at drigon.com a ?crit :
i re-plugged the USB cable and tried /usr/local/bin/sane-find-scanner
and it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
secondly, how can i save all of the debug output of 'scanimage
test.pnm' for you all to see?
add2 outputfileto your command line.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
i tried to set the y_range to 16.0 and reinstalled, but still the light
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/25/2010 12:21 AM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar scar at
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:46 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/25/2010 12:21 AM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @
regardless, there is still no usable image.? so where
are we at getting
this scanner to work?? who can i pay to catalyze
development? ;)
try changing line 146 of mustek_usb2.c from
SANE_FALSE to SANE_TRUE (is this a CIS scanner?)
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Jack McGill jmcgill85258 at yahoo.com wrote:
Scar,
Look in the file mustek_usb2_asic.c around line 3520 where you have a
something like:
/* HOLD: We don't want to have global vid/pids */
static unsigned short ProductID = 0x0409;
static unsigned short
Le Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:11:18 -0700,
scar scar at drigon.com a ?crit :
i re-plugged the USB cable and tried /usr/local/bin/sane-find-scanner
and it detects the scanner like before (thinking it is an HP, etc.)
but still 'sudo /usr/local/bin/scanimage -L' doesn't detect
anything
Do you
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:11 AM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
thank you all so much for the assistance.
i did change the lines in mustek_usb2_asic.c around line 3520 to:
static unsigned short ProductID = 0x040b;
static unsigned short
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ille @ 03/24/2010 12:39 AM:
Le Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:11:18 -0700,
scar scar at drigon.com a ?crit :
i re-plugged the USB cable and tried /usr/local/bin/sane-find-scanner
and it detects the scanner like before (thinking it is an HP, etc.)
but
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:01 AM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ille @ 01/26/2010 04:48 AM:
Hi, I did not investigate much, but it really looks like sq113 ship. In
my opinion, you should try the mustek_usb2 backend.
i have finally purchased
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/22/2010 07:42 PM:
See if as root you can get a result from:
scanimage -L
even as root, it doesn't detect any scanners.
sane-find-scanner does detect it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/22/2010 09:07 PM:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/22/2010 07:42 PM:
See if as root you can get a result from:
scanimage -L
even as root, it doesn't detect any
will end up with multiple instances of sane
installed. See http://mp610.blogspot.com/2008_04_01_archive.html
Jack McGill
--- On Tue, 3/23/10, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
From: scar scar at drigon.com
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Mustek ScanExpress A3 USB 1200 PRO
To: sane-devel
Le Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:13:18 -0700,
scar scar at drigon.com a ?crit :
from what i've read, i just need to add a line like 'usb 0x055f
0x040b' to the configuration file.
i already have a bunch of config files in /etc/sane.d. however,
mustek_usb2 doesn't seem to have a configuration file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
thank you all so much for the assistance.
i did change the lines in mustek_usb2_asic.c around line 3520 to:
static unsigned short ProductID = 0x040b;
static unsigned short VendorID = 0x055f;
and i changed in mustek_usb2.c the x_range and y_range
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ille @ 01/26/2010 04:48 AM:
Hi, I did not investigate much, but it really looks like sq113 ship. In
my opinion, you should try the mustek_usb2 backend.
i have finally purchased the a3 usb 1200 pro. but when i start xsane
(0.996-1ubuntu2) it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/22/2010 07:42 PM:
See if as root you can get a result from:
scanimage -L
even as root, it doesn't detect any scanners.
sane-find-scanner does detect it though:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.],
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:25:20 -0500,
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com a ?crit :
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Scot sane at mailcan.com wrote:
by m. allan noah-3 Jan 18, 2010; 08:52pm
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM, scar scar at ... wrote:
since i require an inexpensive A3
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:25:20 -0500,
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com a ?crit :
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Scot sane at mailcan.com wrote:
by m. allan noah-3 Jan 18, 2010; 08:52pm
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM, scar scar at ... wrote:
since i require an inexpensive
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Scot sane at mailcan.com wrote:
by m. allan noah-3 Jan 18, 2010; 08:52pm
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM, scar scar at ... wrote:
since i require an inexpensive A3 scanner, i plan on purchasing one of
these soon, i have not found any other options. ?Mustek
by m. allan noah-3 Jan 18, 2010; 08:52pm
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM, scar scar at ... wrote:
since i require an inexpensive A3 scanner, i plan on purchasing one of
these soon, i have not found any other options. Mustek appears to have
a linux driver on their Taiwanese website,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
m. allan noah @ 01/03/2010 03:03 PM:
There is clearly a need for an inexpensive A3 sized scanner which
works with sane. It seems that so far, no one with the development
skills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
m. allan noah @ 01/03/2010 03:03 PM:
There is clearly a need for an inexpensive A3 sized scanner which
works with sane. It seems that so far, no one with the development
skills has stepped up to do the needed reverse engineering and
programming.
perhaps the A3 USB and A3 USB 1200 models are not the same?
allan
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 10:04 PM, scar scar at drigon.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jay Anderson @ 09/08/2008 08:53 PM:
I'm trying to get this scanner to work. [snip]
hi, i don't understand how
There is clearly a need for an inexpensive A3 sized scanner which
works with sane. It seems that so far, no one with the development
skills has stepped up to do the needed reverse engineering and
programming. I suppose a group of users could get together a bounty to
spur development. The only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jay Anderson @ 09/08/2008 08:53 PM:
I'm trying to get this scanner to work. [snip]
hi, i don't understand how this scanner has gone from working back in
2005 for jonathan (he created many scanned images of maps) to not
working in 2008. what
Bonjour,
I sent this mail to Mustek support team :
Bonjour,
I have got your fantastic ScanExpress A3 USB 600 pro. My question : Why
don't you create an easy to use/install and working driver for Linux users ?
Thank you for your kind attention.
Best regards
Here is he answer :
Hi
As we rarely
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 07:53:39 am Jay Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to get this scanner to work. I'm on Ubuntu 8.04.
lsusb
Bus 003 Device 005: ID 055f:040b Mustek Systems, Inc.
sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.], product=0x040b
[USB2.0
Dmitry V. Rutsky wrote:
Is there any progress on this? I've got the same device and the same result
with this scanner (on Debian unstable). I haven't got any experience with
scanner drivers, but I'd like to try to tinker with it. It is said in
Daniel Stender uzstzm at uni-bonn.de writes:
Another way would be naturally to make a driver on our own, begin with a USB
sniff within Windows and to
manipulate mustek_usb2 to begin with. But I
do not have any experiences with that.
I have the scanner working through windows on vmware on
robert w hall bobh at n-cantrell.demon.co.uk writes:
Is this another windows driver that uses usbscan.sys???
Bob
How can I check this? I didn't see that file anywhere on the install cd.
I'm trying to get this scanner to work. I'm on Ubuntu 8.04.
lsusb
Bus 003 Device 005: ID 055f:040b Mustek Systems, Inc.
sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.], product=0x040b
[USB2.0 Scanner], chip=SQ113) at libusb:003:005
In my searching I
Jay Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to get this scanner to work. I'm on Ubuntu 8.04.
lsusb
Bus 003 Device 005: ID 055f:040b Mustek Systems, Inc.
sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.], product=0x040b
[USB2.0 Scanner], chip=SQ113) at
Is this another windows driver that uses usbscan.sys???
Bob
In message 48C64A13.6030407 at uni-bonn.de, Daniel Stender uzstzm at uni-
bonn.de writes
Jay Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to get this scanner to work. I'm on Ubuntu 8.04.
lsusb
Bus 003 Device 005: ID 055f:040b Mustek Systems, Inc.
Hi guys,
what's the state of affairs getting the Mustek Scan Express A3 USB 600 Pro
running?
I see that finally there is a Mustek driver:
http://www.mustek.com.tw/apprg/showdriverinfo?LID=2PRODUCTID=SE_A3USB600ProLSID=8
Their hacked libsane_1.0.19-1_i386.deb makes several problems (to be
interesting. i would say that by including scanimage into their
package, they are violating the GPL. you could ask them for the
source...
allan
On 8/12/08, Daniel Stender uzstzm at uni-bonn.de wrote:
Hi guys,
what's the state of affairs getting the Mustek Scan Express A3 USB 600 Pro
Hello,
I can't get this scanner work with Sane 1.0.16 on Mandriva 2006.
I get a sane error : gt68xx:libusb:002:006 invalid argument
can you help me ,
Thanks.
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 12:45:48PM +, Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
Hi,
I got my scanner working OK, with Henning's help a while back.
Everything's been fine but now when I use it I get :
Actually there is a fix for this scanner concerning a possible
segfault in sane-backends 1.0.17
Hi,
I got my scanner working OK, with Henning's help a while back.
Everything's been fine but now when I use it I get :
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of gt68xx to 2.
[gt68xx] SANE GT68xx backend version 1.0 build 71 from sane-backends 1.0.16
[gt68xx] attach: found Mustek flatbed scanner
Hi,
I got my scanner working OK, with Henning's help a while back.
Everything's been fine but now when I use it I get :
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of gt68xx to 2.
[gt68xx] SANE GT68xx backend version 1.0 build 71 from sane-backends 1.0.16
[gt68xx] attach: found Mustek flatbed scanner
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
I hate to say it but everything works fine in Windows, 24bit colour,
600dpi full scan OK
That's fixed in backend version 1.0-75 and in CVS now.
Bye,
Henning
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
I hate to say it but everything works fine in Windows, 24bit colour,
600dpi full scan OK
Ok, I'll try to find out what's the difference between the Windows and
the Linux scan. However, this can take some time.
Bye,
I hate to say it but everything works fine in Windows, 24bit colour,
600dpi full scan OK
Jonathan
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
Has anybody had any problems with scanning at 600 dpi. It scans fine
until about 350mm and
Hi,
Has anybody had any problems with scanning at 600 dpi. It scans fine
until about 350mm and then it sits still. When the image comes out it
looks OK up to 350mm length (full width) and then it's random noise in
the pic, up to its full size (about the remaining 5%).
If I scan at 300dpi,
Hi,
Has anybody had any problems with scanning at 600 dpi. It scans fine
until about 350mm and then it sits still. When the image comes out it
looks OK up to 350mm length (full width) and then it's random noise in
the pic, up to its full size (about the remaining 5%).
If I scan at 300dpi,
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
Has anybody had any problems with scanning at 600 dpi. It scans fine
until about 350mm and then it sits still. When the image comes out it
looks OK up to 350mm length (full width) and then it's random noise in
the pic,
65 matches
Mail list logo
