Hello,
David, David, Markus, Jens, George
I hope you don't mind that I included you in this thread
which is about a new/enhanced standard to access scanners.
At least I would like to have you informed, see the
SANE2, time for a decision thread on
On Sunday 07 January 2007 20:04, Martin Owens wrote:
Toy might want to look at Enlightened Absolutism; because democracy
doesn't work for software development. to inefficient.
full ack.
[SNIPSNAP]
I also think we should setup a more or less small
group of developers who are willing to help
Hi everybody,
I also think we should setup a more or less small
group of developers who are willing to help Oliver
to finish the sane2 standard. We might should setup
a list of stuff that should also go into this new
standard - this list should be more or less a whishlist,
which means that
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:31:03 +0100
Julien BLACHE j...@jblache.org wrote:
Alessandro Zummo azummo-li...@towertech.it wrote:
A fork will inevitably lead to more features
and that might as well turn into sane2.
Or to an utter failure.
You need to calm down and think this through.
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Oliver Rauch wrote:
[snip]
The SANE2 standard is not finished, so it does not make sens to start coding
SANE2. It would be a big mistake to start coding SANE2 at this point because
the standard is not finished and will change.
[snip]
I spent a lot of time in the SANE2
I think he meant that a small group of invested and motivated people
would be able to make a lot faster progress rather than having to put
every idea to a vote rather than saying that most people aren't
qualified to participate. A republic vs. a democracy vs. benevolent
dictatorship if you
Hello sane developers,
Some weeks ago I introduced (once again) the discussion
about SANE future. Now is time to take action.
The situation is that we have coders willing to implement
the SANE2 standard (whatever this will be) for a bunch of backends
but are missing the people required
Am Samstag, 6. Januar 2007 16:19 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
The poll options will be:
- Reopen development on SANE1
- Fork SANE1
- Wait SANE2 indefinitely
The SANE2 standard is not finished, so it does not make sens to start coding
SANE2. It would be a big mistake to start coding SANE2
Hello Alessandro Zummo,
Hello sane developers,
Some weeks ago I introduced (once again) the discussion
about SANE future. Now is time to take action.
The situation is that we have coders willing to implement
the SANE2 standard (whatever this will be) for a bunch of backends
but are
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:09:08 +0100
Frank Zago s...@zago.net wrote:
The poll options will be:
- Reopen development on SANE1
- Fork SANE1
- Wait SANE2 indefinitely
Or evolve a fork of SANE1 into SANE2.
A fork will inevitably lead to more features
and that might as well turn
Am Samstag, 6. Januar 2007 20:39 schrieben Sie:
This way we could have finished the standard in about 8-12 weeks.
After that we could start coding SANE2. And when this standard is worth
to support it then there will be coders for sanei-code and for frontends.
I do agree on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
