Hi,
On 2006-05-31 09:07, m. allan noah wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
Anyone here can give me any pointers? i wont rule out a bug in the
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-05-31 09:07, m. allan noah wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
Anyone here can
Hi,
On 2006-06-01 10:46, m. allan noah wrote:
saned requests 8188 bytes, backend only returns 7656, cause that is an
even number of scanlines. the difference is 532. then saned asks for 528
bytes on the next attempt? why not 532? why not just transmit the 7656?
IIRC, saned uses the first 4
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-06-01 10:46, m. allan noah wrote:
saned requests 8188 bytes, backend only returns 7656, cause that is an
even number of scanlines. the difference is 532. then saned asks for 528
bytes on the next attempt? why not 532? why not just
Hi,
On 2006-06-01 11:14, m. allan noah wrote:
IIRC, saned uses the first 4 bytes in the data stream for the size of
the data that is transmitted.
does that mean that if i actually gave it 8188 bytes, it would drop 4 of
them? i need to look at saned more closely...
No data is dropped. Just
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
Anyone here can give me any pointers? i wont rule out a bug in the
backend, but i dont know enough about saned to even
