Re: Back UP

2021-08-09 Thread Jon Pruente
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:36 PM Larry Linder < 0dea520dd180-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > Have friends and relatives buy a MAC. > I know this is a silly nit to pick in what you are posting about, but it reminded me that I tend to see it most often from technical types. Why do

Re: Scientific Linux Advice

2021-06-29 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:32 AM Larry Linder < 0dea520dd180-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > We tried Alma, and Rock and they contain the fatel install flwas IBM > invented with 7. and up. Alma is just the same as RH 8.x complete with > flaws and booby traps. I pointed this out

Re: Rocky Linux 8.4 General Availability

2021-06-22 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 5:23 PM Dave Dykstra wrote: > CentOS 8.4 release notes says they fixed that issue in that release, > after having resolved it in CentOS Stream 8. > >

Re: Rocky Linux 8.4 General Availability

2021-06-22 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:34 PM Teh, Kenneth M. < 0864eace5c83-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > I tried the boot iso but it does not have a built-in list of mirrors. I'm > stuck at the installation source. I need a url, either a specific repo or > a url. Please post if anyone

Re: scientific.org

2021-03-04 Thread Jon Pruente
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:23 AM Werf, C.G. van der (Carel) < 135eeb68b6b6-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > Seems a recurring issue ... > > > > Any reason why >

Re: RockyEL list archives appear to be behind a paywall

2020-12-31 Thread Jon Pruente
RE: "paywall" This is part of the Rocky team itself and their infrastructure being literally in development. They know and understand these issues and are working to overcome them. They are a team that is growing and overcoming early mistakes and limitations, and admitting to them. That is

Re: RockyEL list archives appear to be behind a paywall

2020-12-31 Thread Jon Pruente
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:06 PM Yasha Karant wrote: > Beef: Slang. a complaint. > an argument or dispute. > > I do not have a complaint, argument, or dispute with Rocky EL or any > other distro, enthusiast, "enterprise", or supported for fee. The > issues are suitability, currency,

Re: RockyEL list archives appear to be behind a paywall

2020-12-30 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 6:51 PM Yasha Karant wrote: > > Thus, unlike either the Ubuntu (including LTS) Ask Ubuntu or this SL > list that are available without any fee with full archive access, it > appears that to get to the RockyEL "list" much older than one calendar > week, one must subscribe

Re: SL compared to Ubuntu LTS major release upgrade

2020-12-22 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 4:45 PM Dave Dykstra wrote: > Fedora releases are much shorter life and I've heard there's a tool > there to upgrade between releases more seamlessly, although I haven't > used it myself. > Release upgrades of Fedora are fairly painless. I've got one server that I

Re: Springdale Linux

2020-12-14 Thread Jon Pruente
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:46 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > To followup on myself. Need a definition of "unsafe". Must make > a distinction between "centos is unsafe" vs "redhat is unsafe" vs > "linux is unsafe" vs "any use of computer is unsafe". > > ("safe as certified by recognized

Re: SL7 with security and bug fixes forever - how much work?

2020-12-14 Thread Jon Pruente
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:54 PM Yasha Karant wrote: > I knew persons using the X86 Mac compatibility layer on PPC Macs, and > was told that there was a noticeable performance hit because the > emulator (more or less) functioned as an "inner interpreter" for a > totally different ISA. The same

Re: SL7 with security and bug fixes forever - how much work?

2020-12-14 Thread Jon Pruente
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:07 PM Yasha Karant wrote: > For the Apple Mac community: as is known, Apple is leaving the X86-64 > platform for an ARM platform. Will older applications be updated, or > will new (and in some cases, newly licensed-for-fee) applications be > required? > The recent

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] RedHat have broken Grub again

2020-10-16 Thread Jon Pruente
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:10 PM Jose Marques < 0fd846b4f4be-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > Thank deity for that. :-) > > The other issue I was having is upgrading my RSS reader and having it show > old articles as unread. Apologies for the wasted bandwidth. > No worries from me.

Re: RedHat have broken Grub again

2020-10-16 Thread Jon Pruente
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:01 PM Jose Marques < 0fd846b4f4be-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > Another security fix has broken booting on RHEL derived systems. > > See: > > >

Re: Recovering root password

2020-06-23 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:50 AM Elio Fabri wrote: > Hi all, > I need help (at lest a link) as to how to recover my root password. > I'm using SL6.2. The password I remember by heart is no longer accepted, > neither for the su command nor for sudo. > Thx > -- > Elio Fabri > The password for sudo

Re: off SL

2020-05-26 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:02 PM Alec Habig < 0eb51fd2fd31-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote: > Also worth noting that on Fedora, upgrades in place via the repository > (it's a simple dnf plugin) work great, and has for a while. > > So, to the extent that Fedora developments often get

Re: Who Uses Scientific Linux, and How/Why?

2020-02-25 Thread Jon Pruente
> > >

Re: Is Scientfic Linux Still Active as a Distribution?

2020-02-21 Thread Jon Pruente
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:21 PM Yasha Karant wrote: > In the simplest terms. I trust IBM to maximize overall > return-on-investment (e.g., profit), and a "free" CentOS that truly > competes with licensed-for-fee products does not fit that for-profit model. > The amount of anti-IBM FUD in these

Re: EL 8

2020-02-03 Thread Jon Pruente
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 1:26 PM Pwillis wrote: > From my personal, outsider, view the ‘Distribution’ thing is a major > bottleneck with the long term stability of Linux. Distributions dilute the > focus on maintenence by dividing the available labour resource over a > foolish duplication of

Re: EL 8

2020-01-31 Thread Jon Pruente
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 7:58 PM Yasha Karant wrote: > soon to be forced to go to another Linux. The options appear to be drop > EL entirely and go to Ubuntu LTS ("stable") current, or to stay with EL > and use Springdale (Princeton) EL8 when (if?) it is available, or Oracle > 8 EL. Thus far,

Re: Calibre current

2020-01-30 Thread Jon Pruente
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:05 AM Yasha Karant wrote: > I attempted to upgrade Calibre to the current production release. It > fails to run (I can post my question) but the response given is: > > I think they are just giving up on supporting anything older at all now that they've moved from QT

Re: centOS 8 ... Gnome 3, Mate

2019-10-10 Thread Jon Pruente
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:15 PM Keith Lofstrom wrote: > That is nice to know, I'll find out how. I presume Mate and > Gnome3 can coexist on the same machine, perhaps with different > logins to access them, so I can make the transition as Gnome3 > is adapted to my needs. No need for separate

Re: SL6 end of life

2019-09-05 Thread Jon Pruente
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:47 AM Larry Linder wrote: > It is interesting that there is a new "yum" as an RPM but do you need to > install it to install the rest of the .rpm packages on the RHEL 8. RPM > pile. > This looks like the chicken / egg problem or can you install the RHEL > rpms with the

Re: SP: proofpoint.com URLs in sl-users messages

2018-07-24 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 09:39:37AM -0500, Glenn Cooper wrote: > Some people dislike these email manglers because they replace obviously > safe URLs (://triumf.ca, >

Re: System running SL 7 fails to update certain packages

2018-07-12 Thread Jon Pruente
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Mark Stodola wrote: > On 07/10/2018 02:58 PM, Mark Stodola wrote: >> Do you have yum-conf-sl7x installed? I do. I did find that on the SL FAQ page earlier. (

System running SL 7 fails to update certain packages

2018-07-10 Thread Jon Pruente
I've got a server running SL 7.3 and while it has installed many updates including recent ones under the 7.5 update, it is not installing all updates to a full SL 7.5 system. I've tried 'yum clean all' and 'rm -rf /var/cache/yum' and they didn't help. The only clue is that 'yum check' returned an