Re: Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

V Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 09:34:41PM +0200, Tomas Hoger napsal(a): > Cases like this are handled by adding suppression rules define in the > security directory of the rpminspect-data package: > > https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/tree/main/security > > You can find few rules for

Re: Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 12:26:44 +0200 Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > I observer a Unicode check failure in > fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis test on > perl-Prima-1.70-1.fc40 package in Fedora CI > : > > A

Re: Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 2:01 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:15:48PM -, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > My questions: > > > > > > Do you agree it's a false positve? > > > Can you sanction ammending Fedora rpminspct policy with: > > > > > > unicode: > > >

Re: Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:15:48PM -, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > My questions: > > > > Do you agree it's a false positve? > > Can you sanction ammending Fedora rpminspct policy with: > > > > unicode: > > ignore: > > # 0x202D character used on purpose to

Re: Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

> My questions: > > Do you agree it's a false positve? > Can you sanction ammending Fedora rpminspct policy with: > > unicode: > ignore: > # 0x202D character used on purpose to demonstrate RLE in > # a documentation. >

Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

Hello, I observer a Unicode check failure in fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis test on perl-Prima-1.70-1.fc40 package in Fedora CI : A forbidden code point, 0x202D, was found in the