Re: RFR: 8284209: Replace remaining usages of 'a the' in source code

2022-05-18 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:46:42 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations: > a/the, an?/an?, the/the… > > It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of > the code. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

Re: RFR: 8284191: Replace usages of 'a the' in hotspot and java.base

2022-05-18 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 18 May 2022 13:27:24 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations: > a/the, an?/an?, the/the… > > Also, I fixed a couple of spelling mistakes. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). - PR:

Re: RFR: JDK-8286348: incorrect use of `@serial`

2022-05-06 Thread Iris Clark
On Sat, 7 May 2022 01:04:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > Please review a fix to remove incorrect use of the `@serial` tag from the doc > comments for methods such as `readObject` and `readResolve`. The tag has no > effect in this position other than to trigger warnings from the standard >

Re: RFR: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base

2022-04-14 Thread Iris Clark
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:07:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those > changes where it indeed discovered real typos. > > (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically) > > The majority of fixes are in

Re: RFR: 8283698: Refactor Locale constructors used in src/test

2022-04-06 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:45:13 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > This is a follow-on task after deprecating the Locale constructors > (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8282819). Most of the changes are > simple replacements to Locale constructors with `Locale.of()` or Locale > constants, such as

Re: RFR: 8283426: Fix 'exeption' typo

2022-03-20 Thread Iris Clark
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:30:01 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: > Fix repeated type `exeption` Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7879

Re: RFR: 8282723: Add constructors taking a cause to JSSE exceptions [v5]

2022-03-18 Thread Iris Clark
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:02:16 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: >> Please review this small API enhancement to add the usual constructors >> taking a cause to javax.net.ssl exceptions. The use of initCause in the >> JSSE implementation code is updated to use the new constructors accordingly. >>

Re: RFR: 8282723: Add constructors taking a cause to JSSE exceptions [v5]

2022-03-18 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 21:00:40 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: >> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> more test case udpate > > test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/SSLException/CheckSSLHandshakeException.java line 2: > >>

Re: RFR: 8282657: Code cleanup: removing double semicolons at the end of lines

2022-03-04 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:39:31 GMT, Matteo Baccan wrote: > Hi > > I have reviewed the code for removing double semicolons at the end of lines > > all the best > matteo Nice tidy of the code. Is there anything that can be done to prevent re-introduction of this trivial problem? Perhaps a new

Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS

2022-02-01 Thread Iris Clark
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:11:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not > done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

Re: RFR: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs

2022-01-19 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:18:32 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > Two edits. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7147

Re: RFR: 8274333: Redundant null comparison after Pattern.split

2021-11-18 Thread Iris Clark
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 15:10:52 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: > In couple of classes, result part of arrays of Pattern.split is compared with > `null`. Pattern.split (and hence String.split) never returns `null` in array > elements. Such comparisons are redundant. Marked as reviewed by iris

Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base

2021-11-02 Thread Iris Clark
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:30:56 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: > This PR follows up one of the recent PRs, where I used a non-canonical > modifier order. Since the problem was noticed [^1], why not to address it at > mass? > > As far as I remember, the first mass-canonicalization of modifiers took place

Re: RFR: 8274075: Fix miscellaneous typos in java.base [v4]

2021-09-22 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:38:33 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: >> 8274075: Fix miscellaneous typos in java.base > > Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Add missing "the" > > (Spotted by Brian Burkhalter.) Marked as

Re: RFR: 8274075: Fix miscellaneous typos in java.base [v2]

2021-09-21 Thread Iris Clark
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 13:16:02 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: >> 8274075: Fix miscellaneous typos in java.base > > Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Tweak wording for Throwable constructor parameters Marked as reviewed by

Re: RFR: 8273261: Replace 'while' cycles with iterator with enhanced-for in java.base

2021-09-02 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:37:53 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: > There are few places in code where manual while loop is used with Iterator to > iterate over Collection. > Instead of manual while cycles it's preferred to use enhanced-for cycle > instead: it's less verbose, makes code easier to read

Re: RFR: 8267587: Update java.util to use enhanced switch [v6]

2021-05-25 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 26 May 2021 02:22:42 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote: >> Inspired by PR#4088. Most of the changes are done automatically using >> IntelliJ IDEA refactoring. Some manual adjustments are also performed, >> including indentations, moving comments, extracting common cast out of >> switch

Re: RFR: 8263892: More modifier order fixes in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:23:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private > final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to a > different bug number if required. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

Re: RFR: 8252833: Correct "no comment" warnings from javadoc in java.smartcardio module

2021-03-10 Thread Iris Clark
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:13:12 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Disable the "missing" target for java.smartcardio from doclint. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2930

Re: RFR: 8263105: security-libs doclint cleanup [v3]

2021-03-10 Thread Iris Clark
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 22:19:28 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: >> Fix various things pointed out by the most recent doclint run in the >> security-libs area. >> >> This is docs only: I will be checking doccheck/doclint, and will be running >> tier1/tier2 tests. Minor spot checks on generated

Re: RFR: 8263105: security-libs doclint cleanup

2021-03-08 Thread Iris Clark
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 07:31:09 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Fix various things pointed out by the most recent doclint run in the > security-libs area. > > This is docs only: I will be checking doccheck/doclint, and will be running > tier1/tier2 tests. Minor spot checks on generated files.

Re: RFR: 8263190: Update java.io, java.math, and java.text to use instanceof pattern variable

2021-03-08 Thread Iris Clark
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:48:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`, > `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the `instanceof` pattern > variable? > > Kind regards, > Patrick Marked as reviewed by iris

Re: RFR: JDK-8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @spec tag

2020-10-22 Thread Iris Clark
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:16:23 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > The change is (just) to remove legacy usages of a JDK-private custom tag. Nice clean-up. - Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/814

RE: RFR (12): 8215318: Amend the Standard Algorithm Names specification to clarify that names can be defined in later versions

2019-01-02 Thread Iris Clark
Hi, Sean. These changes look good. Thanks, iris -Original Message- From: Sean Mullan Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 12:43 PM To: security Dev OpenJDK ; IRIS,CLARK Subject: RFR (12): 8215318: Amend the Standard Algorithm Names specification to clarify that names can be defined

RE: RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

2015-07-20 Thread Iris Clark
Hi, Anthony, Brad, Max, Sean, and Valerie. Just a quick thanks to all for your time in reviewing this issue. I pushed the changeset this morning to verona/stage. Expect the changeset to get to jdk9/* when we Verona is complete, later this summer. Regards, iris -Original Message-

RE: RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

2015-07-17 Thread Iris Clark
if you have any additional concerns. Thanks, iris -Original Message- From: Sean Mullan Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 9:23 AM To: Weijun Wang; Iris Clark; security-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

RE: RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

2015-07-17 Thread Iris Clark
Hi, Max. Thanks for taking the time to review. Regards, iris -Original Message- From: Weijun Wang Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 8:57 PM To: Iris Clark; security-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

RE: RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

2015-07-17 Thread Iris Clark
On 7/7/2015 10:48 AM, Iris Clark wrote: Hi. Please review changes to resolve the following bug: 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9 (Verona) Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130696 Changeset: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris

RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

2015-07-07 Thread Iris Clark
Hi. Please review changes to resolve the following bug: 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9 (Verona) Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130696 Changeset: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/verona/8130696/webrev The

RE: RFR: 8044059: Memory Leak in Elliptic Curve Private Key Generation

2014-05-28 Thread Iris Clark
Hi, Jeremy. As an Author, you can create a changeset but you can't push to the repo until you're a Committer. Additional details about the differences between Author and Committer may be found here [1,2]. The diffs to create a changeset are (of course) in your webrev. Your Sponsor can use

RE: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR(L) - 2nd round: 8024854: Basic changes and files to build the class library on AIX

2013-11-27 Thread Iris Clark
So overall it looks good to me and should be pushed to the staging forest once you hear from others that commented previously. I think that means Chris Hegarty, Michael McMahon, and Sergey Bylokhov. Alan, please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks, iris -Original Message- From: Alan