> On 23 Jun 2023, at 08:16, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
>
> When someone comes up with a simpler design, I'm all up for the effectiveness
> challenge, I'm pretty sure that whatever it is, we'll blow it away both on
> performance and effectiveness, we've had years to perfect it, but I would
>
On 23/06/2023 11:06 am, Ron Pressler wrote:
On 22 Jun 2023, at 23:50, Peter Firmstone wrote:
If you are able to share, I'd be interested to learn about challenges you had
with SM, if we one day have the opportunity to reimplement it, the lessons
might be valuable, so we can avoid the
> On 22 Jun 2023, at 23:50, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
>
> If you are able to share, I'd be interested to learn about challenges you had
> with SM, if we one day have the opportunity to reimplement it, the lessons
> might be valuable, so we can avoid the same mistakes.
Much of the effort has
eter Firmstone
*Cc:* c...@anastigmatix.net ;
security-dev@openjdk.org
*Subject:* Re: [External] : Re: PrivilegedAction et al and JEP411
> On 21 Jun 2023, at 01:36, Peter Firmstone
wrote:
>
>
> I'm just disappointed that we are being prevented from
reimplementing a replacement authorizat
ity-dev on behalf of Ron Pressler
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 12:52 PM
To: Peter Firmstone
Cc: c...@anastigmatix.net ; security-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: PrivilegedAction et al and JEP411
> On 21 Jun 2023, at 01:36, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
>
> I'm ju
> On 22 Jun 2023, at 02:21, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
> This discussion on OpenSearch is worth a read.
> https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/issues/1687
The cross-platform API (SystemCallFilter) is something that looks like it would
make for an interesting separate library.
I
On 21/06/2023 8:52 pm, Ron Pressler wrote:
On 21 Jun 2023, at 01:36, Peter Firmstone wrote:
I'm just disappointed that we are being prevented from reimplementing a
replacement authorization layer in Java, without any compromise from OpenJDK
it's not possible. We at least need to retain
> On 21 Jun 2023, at 01:36, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
>
> I'm just disappointed that we are being prevented from reimplementing a
> replacement authorization layer in Java, without any compromise from OpenJDK
> it's not possible. We at least need to retain some kind of privilege action
>
On 20/06/2023 9:04 pm, Ron Pressler wrote:
On 20 Jun 2023, at 06:26, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Don't get me wrong, it's good that OpenJDK is improving encapsulation, it's
just OpenJDK is also undoing years of tested and hardened API's,
You probably meant that as a bad thing, but I read it as
> On 20 Jun 2023, at 06:26, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
> Don't get me wrong, it's good that OpenJDK is improving encapsulation, it's
> just OpenJDK is also undoing years of tested and hardened API's,
You probably meant that as a bad thing, but I read it as thank you for serving
your users!
10 matches
Mail list logo
