Hello Martijn and CA/B,
I like where we're going with this and wholeheartedly agree with the desire
to not obscure useful logging with excessive volume of useless logs.
In that vein, I'm curious what uses people have for logging all blocked
traffic on an internet facing firewall. To me it seems
Hi Inigo,
These changes look good to me as well (though the rearranging of P-Label did
get me for a second there, thinking it had been removed) and I’d be willing to
endorse if needed.
Cheers,
-Clint
> On Sep 13, 2023, at 4:45 AM, Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg
> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
This cleanup looks good to me, and I'm happy to endorse.
Aaron
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:45 AM Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> We are looking for feedback on the following draft ballot as well as
> endorsers.
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
>
Hi all,
I have a very different proposal for a Certificate Consumer membership
criterion. I have no objection to any of the currently-proposed criteria;
this could easily be in addition to them. What if we added:
> (c) Applicants that qualify as Certificate Consumers must supply the
following
Hi Martijn,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg wrote:
During our last WebTrust audit cycle it became clear that our
interpretation of "Firewall and router activities" and CPA Canada's
interpretation were meaningfully different. In particular it came to
light that in its
Forwarding to the correct public mailing list.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [cabfpub] [cabfman] [EXTERNAL] Final SCWG agenda - Thursday,
September 14, 2023 at 11:30 am Eastern Time
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:20:25 +
From: Dustin Hollenback via Public
Reply-To: Dustin