Kamu SM votes "YES" to Ballot SC-070.
Tuğba ÖZCAN
E-İmza Teknolojileri Bölüm Yöneticisi
TÜBİTAK/BİLGEM/Kamu SM
Çamlıca Mahallesi 408. Cadde No: 136
C Blok 5. Kat Yenimahalle/Ankara
Dahili:8543
tugba.oz...@tubitak.gov.tr
Kimden: "CA"
Kime: "CA"
Gönderilenler: 13 Şubat
Since there’s no further comments, I will start version 2 of this ballot’s
discussion period in the next 24 hours based on the feedback received from
Clint, unless there are further comments.
From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Martijn
Katerbarg via Servercert-wg
Date: Wednesday, 7 February
Mozilla votes "yes" to Ballot SC-070.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:56 AM Aaron Gable via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:
> This new voting period is to fix a typo in the End timestamp of the voting
> period for the previous version of this ballot. The contents of the motion
>
GlobalSign votes YES on SC-070
Doug
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Aaron
Gable via Servercert-wg
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 11:57 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of
DTPs for
Buypass votes YES on ballot SC-070.
Regards
Mads
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Aaron
Gable via Servercert-wg
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 5:57 PM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs
Telia votes ’YES’ on ballot SC-70
//Antti
From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Aaron
Gable via Servercert-wg
Date: Tuesday, 13. February 2024 at 18.57
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs
Thanks, Inigo! I've started a new voting period here:
https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004202.html
Aaron
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:31 AM Inigo Barreira
wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
>
>
> I think so. The SCWG charter does not say anything about it but the CABF
> bylaws
This new voting period is to fix a typo in the End timestamp of the voting
period for the previous version of this ballot. The contents of the motion
itself are identical. My apologies for the confusion.
This ballot aims to clarify the existing language around the use of
delegated third-parties
Hi Aaron,
I think so. The SCWG charter does not say anything about it but the CABF bylaws
indicate the following under section 2.3 General provisions applicable to all
ballots:
1. Any Voting Representative can call for a proposed ballot to be
published for discussion and comment by
My apologies, that was an obvious typo. Chairs, is that the kind of typo
that requires the voting period to restart?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:29 PM Mads Egil Henriksveen <
mads.henriksv...@buypass.no> wrote:
> Buypass votes YES on ballot SC-070.
>
>
>
> The vote period end
10 matches
Mail list logo
