Re: [Servercert-wg] Compromised/Weak Keys Ballot Proposal

Hi Clint, Thank you for your response. Unfortunately, it leads me to the conclusion that there is not a path forward and we're stuck with the status quo. Having said that, I'll reply to a few of your points below and encourage others to do the same if there is a desire to move forward with an

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Buypass votes YES on ballot SC-69v3 Regards Mads From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 11:59 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Let's Encrypt / ISRG votes Yes on Ballot SC-69v3. On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 2:59 AM Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg < servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: > *Summary: * > > This ballot aims to clarify what data needs to be logged as part of the > "Firewall and router activities" logging

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Google votes Yes on Ballot SC-69v3. On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 5:59 AM Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg < servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: > *Summary: * > > This ballot aims to clarify what data needs to be logged as part of the > "Firewall and router activities" logging requirement in the

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

CommScope votes "YES" on ballot SC-69v3. Nicol So From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 5:59 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

CommScope votes "YES" on ballot SC65. Nicol So From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 10:34 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

DigiCert votes YES on SC-65v2. While the ballot motion contains a potentially confusing redline link, it does not affect the actual text changes introduced by the ballot. Additionally, the reformat proposed by this ballot is valuable in getting us closer to consistently formatted documents, so

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

GlobalSign votes Yes on Ballot SC65. Doug From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 9:34 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647

[Servercert-wg] ODP: [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Certum votes Yes on Ballot SC65 Kind regards, Kateryna Aleksieieva Od: Servercert-wg w imieniu użytkownika Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Wysłane: poniedziałek, 4 marca 2024 16:33 Do: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Temat:

[Servercert-wg] ODP: [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Certum votes Yes on Ballot SC-69v3 Kind regards, Kateryna Aleksieieva Junior quality specialist Trust Services Department Asseco Data Systems S.A. Certum Bajeczna 13 71-838 Szczecin mob. +48 785 505 660

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

All, The correct comparison URL is

[Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

smime.p7m Description: S/MIME encrypted message ___ Servercert-wg mailing list Servercert-wg@cabforum.org https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

[Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

IdenTrust votes 'Yes' on SC-69v3 Summary: This ballot aims to clarify what data needs to be logged as part of the "Firewall and router activities" logging requirement in the Baseline Requirements. This ballot is proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Daniel Jeffery (Fastly)

Re: [Servercert-wg] Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 69, Issue 3

Disig votes "YES" on Ballot SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements. Regards Peter Miskovic Today's Topics: 1. [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements (Martijn Katerbarg)

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Izenpe votes “YES” on SC-65 De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 4 de marzo de 2024 16:34 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

JPRS votes YES to Ballot SC-65. Yoshihiko Matsuo On 2024/03/05 0:33, Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: *Summary: * The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto