Thank you all for the great feedback! We’ll take this offline and re-work it
based on the input.
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 1:24 AM
To: Aaron Gable ; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List
Dear Members,
Following up to the CP/CPS RFC3647 alignment discussion at the last F2F,
I prepared a ballot to address the ambiguity regarding the appropriate
sections from RFC 3647 that CAs need to include in their CP and/or CPS
documents.
An effective date was added because these changes
On 19/4/2024 9:54 μ.μ., Aaron Gable wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:07 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
Servercert-wg wrote:
What happens if the SA/ToS document changes? I had the impression
that the ACME client would be able to see the new version and ask
that the
Issues
--
* cabforum/servercert (+2/-0/5)
2 issues created:
- Remove extraneous "for either" in 3.2.2.4.7 (by clintwilson)
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/502 [baseline-requirements] [clean-up]
- Review of EVG cabfOrganizationIdentifier (by srdavidson)
