Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Telia changes its vote to ’no’ on Ballot SC-74 //Antti Lähettäjä: Servercert-wg käyttäjän Backman, Antti via Servercert-wg puolesta Lähetetty: tiistaina, toukokuuta 7, 2024 8:31 ip. Vastaanottaja: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) ; CA/B Forum Server

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Telia votes ’Yes’ on Ballot SC-074 //Antti Lähettäjä: Servercert-wg käyttäjän Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg puolesta Lähetetty: sunnuntaina, toukokuuta 5, 2024 11:24 ap. Vastaanottaja: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Telia Company votes ‘Yes’ on Ballot SC-073 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg Date: Friday, 26. April 2024 at 3.00 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Telia votes ‘Yes’ on ballot SC-72 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Date: Monday, 25. March 2024 at 14.01 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to

Re: [Servercert-wg] Discussion Period Begins - Ballot SC-067 V1: "Require domain validation and CAA checks to be performed from multiple Network Perspectives”

Hi Chris Could there be a numbering clash with this ballot and the one being worked on by Ben Wilson? “[Servercert-wg] Draft Ballot SC-067: Applicant, Subscriber and Subscriber Agreements - Feedback r” As I am not completely sure how ballot numbering should work out, can the numbers be

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Telia votes ‘Yes’ on ballot SC65 v2. //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Date: Monday, 4. March 2024 at 17.34 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Telia votes ‘Yes’ on ballot SC-69v3 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg Date: Monday, 4. March 2024 at 12.59 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

Telia votes ’YES’ on ballot SC-70 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Aaron Gable via Servercert-wg Date: Tuesday, 13. February 2024 at 18.57 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Begins for Ballot SC-68: Allow VATEL and VATXI for organizationIdentifier

Telia Company votes ’Yes’ to ballot SC-68 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg Date: Tuesday, 23. January 2024 at 11.00 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Begins for Ballot SC-68:

Re: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

Hi Inigo Would it be by any chance possible to create a PDF version of the new RFC based revision. As the old guideline format and RFC do not match very well structurally (by headers / sections) the markup document is pretty difficult to go through. I may be old-fashioned, but I would see