Re: [Servercert-wg] Discussion Period Begins - Ballot SC-067 V3: "Require domain validation and CAA checks to be performed from multiple Network Perspectives"

Marco, this ballot is under discussion period not voting period. You don´t have to vote but discuss if needed De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Marco Schambach via Servercert-wg Enviado el: martes, 21 de mayo de 2024 23:13 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto:

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-75 - Pre-sign linting

, there is no expectation that the updated version is deployed). Thanks for your consideration. - Ryan On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 2:04 PM Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg < <mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org> servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: Hi Dimitris, I don´t know if the “(hel

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-75 - Pre-sign linting

Sure, in the last para of section 4.3.1.2, the sentence “… but CAs SHOULD use (and help improve) the Linting tools …” and I was suggesting removing that “(and help improve)” because IMO this can´t go in the main requirement/recommendation and “the help to improve” be seen as another requirement

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-75 - Pre-sign linting

Hi Dimitris, I don´t know if the “(help to improve)” is adding any additional hidden requirement. IMO, I´d remove that. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 20 de mayo de 2024 19:57 Para: CA/B Forum Server

Re: [Servercert-wg] Discussion about single-purpose client authentication leaf certificates issued from a server TLS Issuing CA

> I'm not sure if this issue deserves some dedicated time for discussion at the > upcoming F2F but Inigo could add it as an agenda item. At the very least we > should capture the group's preference and proceed accordingly. Dimitris, if you want this to be discussed at the F2F SCWG, just drop

[Servercert-wg] Results of Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Hi The voting period for SC74 (Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647) has completed, and the ballot has failed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 22 votes total, with no abstentions: * 1 Issuers voting YES: iTrusChina * 21 Issuers voting NO: Amazon, Buypass,

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of the SCWG call of April 25th

Subject: Final minutes of the SCWG call of April 25th These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message, prepared by Ryan Dickson (Google Chrome). Server Certificate Working Group Agenda – 25 April 2024 Attendees: Aaron Poulsen (Amazon

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG agenda for May 9th

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Aaron Gable is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda – 9 May 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * Minutes from April 25th circulated

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC JXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=MuPnYpz8oUZbQkYYIn2Ex7XS6szbLXsYi2sUf%2Fv 27lQ%3D=0> public website in accordance with the Bylaws. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: miércoles, 3 de abril de 2024

Re: [Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-73: Compromised and weak keys

Minor correction on the vote section of browsers. Sorry for the confusion De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 3 de mayo de 2024 15:31 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot

[Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-73: Compromised and weak keys

Hi The voting period for SC73 (Compromised and weak keys) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 23 votes total, with no abstentions: * 23 Issuers voting YES: Actalis, Certum (Asseco), CFCA, CommScope, D-TRUST, Disig, Entrust, Fastly, GDCA,

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Hi, Would like to know who voted on behalf of CFCA, can you provide? I can´t find this name on the list. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de ??? via Servercert-wg Enviado el: domingo, 28 de abril de 2024 11:24 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Hi Tsung-Min, Unfortunately, this vote can´t be counted because has been received past the end date. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de ??? via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 3 de mayo de 2024 3:45 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: Re:

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Sectigo votes yes De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 26 de abril de 2024 2:00 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys CAUTION:

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of the SCWG call of April 11th

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message. Dimitris is leading the call at Inigo's request due to a medical appointment. Note-well read before Roll-call (but preserved normal order for the minutes structure here). 1. Roll Call Aaron Gable

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes SCWG call March 28th

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message. Server Certificate Working Group - 28 March 2024 1.Roll Call Aaron Gable - (ISRG), Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Abhishek Bhat - (eMudhra), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign), Alvin

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of the SCWG meeting on Feb 15th of 2024

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message, prepared by Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo). 1. Roll Call Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt), Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Abhishek Bhat - (eMudhra), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign), Antti

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG agenda for April 25th

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Ryan Dickson is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda – 25 April 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * Minutes from February 15th

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC JXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=MuPnYpz8oUZbQkYYIn2Ex7XS6szbLXsYi2sUf%2Fv 27lQ%3D=0> public website in accordance with the Bylaws. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 15 de marzo de 2024 11:01 Para

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC69: Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

h the Bylaws. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: miércoles, 13 de marzo de 2024 18:21 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC69: Clarify router and fire

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG Agenda April 11th

Dear members, Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Scott Rea is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 11 April 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * Minutes from

[Servercert-wg] 2024-03-14 Final Minutes of the Server Certificate Working Group

Server Certificate Working Group - 14 March 2024 Attendees: Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign), Antti Backman - (Telia Company), Brianca Martin - (Amazon), Bruce Morton - (Entrust), Chris Clements - (Google), Clint Wilson - (Apple), Corey Rasmussen -

Re: [Servercert-wg] Fixing lag between requirements changes and linter updates

Hi, I like the spirit of the linters but as said in some of the emails it´s not that easy for some members (even drafting a ballot nowadays ) and it´s not required at all (can´t be added in a ballot something that is not a requirement). So, although there´s been many bugzillas indicating

[Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-72: Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Hi The voting period for SC72 (Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 15 votes total, with no abstentions: * 15 Issuers voting YES: Buypass, Certum

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Sorry, this vote can´t be counted because arrived past the end time. De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Tom Zermeno via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 1 de abril de 2024 16:37 Para: Paul van Brouwershaven ; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: Re: [Servercert-wg]

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG Agenda March 28th

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. The call will be run by Kiran Tummala, SCWG vice-chair. Lynn Jeun (VISA) is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 28 March 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Sectigo votes YES De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 25 de marzo de 2024 13:01 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

the conflict. De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 23 de febrero de 2024 19:06 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG Agenda March 14th

Hi all, Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Wayne Thayer is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 14 March 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * Minutes from February

[Servercert-wg] Results of the ballot SC-65 v2: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

Hi The voting period for SC65 (Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 23 votes total, with no abstentions: * 23 Issuers voting YES: Actalis, Buypass, Certum (Asseco), CFCA, CommScope, D-TRUST, DigiCert,

[Servercert-wg] Results of the ballot SC-69 v3: Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Hi The voting period for SC69 (Clarify router and firewall logging requirements) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 26 votes total, with no abstentions: * 26 Issuers voting YES: Amazon, Buypass, Certum (Asseco), CFCA, Chunghwa Telecom,

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

ARICA is uncertain about the changes introduced and therefore votes "no" to ballot SC65. On 4/3/2024 5:33 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the

[Servercert-wg] Ballots SC65 and SC69 on voting period

Hi, This is just a reminder that there´re 2 ballots on voting period, SC65 and SC69. The reason for this email is that I´m checking that some members vote on one ballot or on the other and few are voting on both and I don´t know if that´s done on purpose or it´s because having 2 ballots at

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

the changes introduced and therefore votes "no" to ballot SC65. On 4/3/2024 5:33 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Sectigo votes YES De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 4 de marzo de 2024 17:34 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2 CAUTION

[Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto standard) for the CA/Browser Forum to develop other documents. This ballot aims to update the EVGs to follow the RFC

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Sectigo votes YES De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Martijn Katerbarg via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 4 de marzo de 2024 11:59 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-69v3 Clarify router and firewall logging

[Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation v2

Hi This is version 2 of the results including the vote from SwissSign. The voting period for SC70 (Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 28 votes total, with no abstentions: * 28

[Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

Hi The voting period for SC70 (Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 27 votes total, with no abstentions: * 27 Issuers voting YES: Actalis, Buypass, Certum (Asseco), CFCA, Chunghwa

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

Vijay, Scott Rea already voted. This vote won´t be count. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Vijay Kumar M via Servercert-wg Enviado el: lunes, 19 de febrero de 2024 3:33 Para: Aaron Gable ; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: Re: [Servercert-wg]

[Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format v2

Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto standard) for the CA/Browser Forum to develop other documents. This ballot aims to update the EVGs to follow the RFC

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

no normative requirements changes in the ballot preamble so that the intent of the language changes is clear. Thanks, Corey From: Servercert-wg mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 8:30 AM To: CA/B Forum

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

Hi, I´m withdrawing this ballot due to a typo in “new” section 7.1.2.2. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 16 de febrero de 2024 15:36 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

irements changes introduced in this ballot? If there are none, it would be useful to indicate that there are no normative requirements changes in the ballot preamble so that the intent of the language changes is clear. Thanks, Corey From: Servercert-wg mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabfo

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

Sectigo votes YES De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Aaron Gable via Servercert-wg Enviado el: martes, 13 de febrero de 2024 17:57 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

Corey From: Servercert-wg mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 8:30 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org> > Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Discus

[Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto standard) for the CA/Browser Forum to develop other documents. This ballot aims to update the EVGs to follow the RFC

[Servercert-wg] Final Minutes of the SCWG Meeting January 4, 2024

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message. Roll Call Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Andrea Holland - (VikingCloud), Ben Wilson - (Mozilla), Brianca Martin - (Amazon), Cade Cairns - (Google), Chris Clements -

[Servercert-wg] Final Minutes of the SCWG Meeting February 1, 2024

Minutes of Server Certificate WG February 1, 2024 These are the Final Minutes of the meeting described in the subject of this message. Attendees Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt), Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Abhishek Bhat - (eMudhra), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Andrea Holland -

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG Agenda February 15th

Sorry, forgot to change the title. It´s the final agenda. De: Inigo Barreira Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de febrero de 2024 12:52 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: RV: Draft SCWG Agenda February 15th Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Tim

[Servercert-wg] RV: Draft SCWG Agenda February 15th

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Tim Hollebeek is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda – 15 February 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * Minutes from January 4th and

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

Hi Aaron, I think so. The SCWG charter does not say anything about it but the CABF bylaws indicate the following under section 2.3 General provisions applicable to all ballots: 1. Any Voting Representative can call for a proposed ballot to be published for discussion and comment by

[Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC65: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format

Summary: The Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were developed and written in a specific format. Since then, the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto standard) for the CA/Browser Forum to develop other documents. This ballot aims to update the EVGs to follow the RFC

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL]- Seeking endorsers: SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

at the last meeting, we need to also update the BRs in the same ballot to update possible references to the EV Guidelines. Best regards, Dimitris. On 8/2/2024 11:20 μ.μ., Pedro FUENTES via Servercert-wg wrote: Count me in Le 8 févr. 2024 à 18:53, Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg <mailt

[Servercert-wg] Seeking endorsers: SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

Hi, As mentioned in the past SCWG call, I´m looking for 2 endorsers for this ballot. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 19 de enero de 2024 13:28 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List ; Dimitris

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of SCWG call on Jan 18th

These are the final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message. Server Certificate Working Group Meeting Attendance: Yashwanth - eMudhra Brianca Martin - Amazon Paul van Brouwershaven Wayne Thayer - Fastly Andrea Holland - VikingCloud Jaime

[Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-68: Allow VATEL and VATXI for organizationIdentifier

Hi The voting period for SC68 (Allow VATEL and VATXI for organizationIdentifier) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 23 votes total, with no abstentions: * 23 Issuers voting YES: Actalis, Buypass, CFCA, CommScope, D-TRUST, DigiCert, Disig,

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG Agenda - February 1st

Hello Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Stephen Davidson is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 1 February 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * Minutes of Jan 18th

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Begins for Ballot SC-68: Allow VATEL and VATXI for organizationIdentifier

Sectigo votes YES De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg Enviado el: martes, 23 de enero de 2024 10:00 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Voting Begins for Ballot SC-68: Allow VATEL and VATXI for

[Servercert-wg] SCWG final meeting minutes of 7 december 2023

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message, prepared by Kiran Tummala (Microsoft). Forum Session Attendees * Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt) Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon) Adam Jones - (Microsoft) Alison Wang - (TrustAsia) Andrea Holland -

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG agenda - Thursday, January 18, 2024 11:00 ET

Hi all Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Rebecca Kelley (Apple) is scheduled to take minutes. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda – 18 January 2024 1. Begin Recording and Roll Call 2. Read Note-well 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: * 7 December: circulated on

Re: [Servercert-wg] Section 7.1.5 as required by RFC 3647 is no longer in the TLS BRs

Yes, in the already published version 2.0.2, the section 7.1.5 is included. This section is empty as many other sections in the TLS BRs, for example, 7.1.7, 7.1.8 and 7.1.9, which are just right after. > Hopefully we can add pointers to the right name constraints language Sure. De:

[Servercert-wg] Notice of Review Period: Ballot SC66 v4: Fall 2023 Clean up

<https://cabforum.org/> Baseline Requirements Documents (SSL/TLS Server Certificates) – CAB Forum<https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/>, in PDF and Redline form, in accordance with the Bylaws. Regards De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-w

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of the SCWG 26 October

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message, prepared by Michelle Coon (OATI). Server Certificate Working Group Attendance: Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Abhishek Bhat - (eMudhra), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Andrea Holland - (VikingCloud), Ben Wilson -

[Servercert-wg] Final Minutes of SCWG Meeting September 28, 2023

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message. Attendance: Aaron Gable (Let's Encrypt), Aaron Poulsen (Amazon), Abhishek Bhat (eMudhra), Adam Clark (Visa), Adam Jones (Microsoft), Adrian Mueller (SwissSign), Andrea Holland (VikingCloud), Ben

Re: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

11.14 of the EV Guidelines talks about re-use of existing documentation which fits into section 4.2.1 of the BRs. Thanks, Dimitris. Thanks, Bruce. From: Servercert-wg <mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, December 4,

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG agenda - December 7 11:30 ET

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 7 December 2023 1. Roll Call and Begin Recording (* not needed) 2. Read Note-well (* not needed) 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: *28 September: circulated on 24/10 *F2F

Re: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2022-May/000795.html>. For each existing section/paragraph, it would be nice to have a comment describing where that existing language will land in the converted document (destination). This will allow all existing text to be accounted for. During this process, you

Re: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

). This will allow all existing text to be accounted for. During this process, you might encounter duplicate or redundant text which needs to be flagged accordingly. You might also get into some uncertainty as to which RFC3647 section is a best fit for existing text that might require additional d

[Servercert-wg] Draft - Face to Face 60 SCWG meeting minutes

Attendance to be include later. Meeting minutes for Face to Face SCWG Revocation: The current rules in place were established about a decade ago, and much has changed since then, especially in terms of certificate volumes and crt.sh. Often, revocation appears to be a cosmetic issue, and

Re: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

nt text which needs to be flagged accordingly. You might also get into some uncertainty as to which RFC3647 section is a best fit for existing text that might require additional discussion. I hope this helps. Dimitris. On 29/8/2023 12:42 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: Hi Tim, See attached

[Servercert-wg] Results of the Ballot SC-066 v4: Fall 2023 Clean up

Hi The voting period for SC66 (Fall 2023 Clean up) has completed, and the ballot has passed. Voting Results Certificate Issuers 24 votes total, with no abstentions: * 24 Issuers voting YES: Actalis, Amazon, Buypass, Chunghwa Telecom, D-Trust, Digicert, Disig, eMudhra, Entrust,

Re: [Servercert-wg] VOTE FOR APPROVAL Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v4

Sectigo votes YES De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: jueves, 16 de noviembre de 2023 19:50 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] VOTE FOR APPROVAL Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v4 CAUTION: This email

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v4

Hi everyone, This new version, v4, of the ballot SC66 covers the change requested by Tobias regarding issue #423 related to the NetSec version, which has been reverted to the current version so we can start another round of discussion on this clean-up ballot. Regards Purpose of Ballot

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v3

Thanks for the clarification, for me it´s not a problem to leave the NetSec version number as it is now, v1.7, and therefore apply #423 as initially proposed. I will make the correspondent changes and will provide a new version unless someone else speaks up and have a different view or

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v3

Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v3 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Inigo, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: > -

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v3

Hi everyone, This new version, v3, of the ballot SC66 covers the change requested in Inconsistent document formatting (Markdown vs PDF) · Issue #462 · cabforum/servercert (github.com) so we can start another round of discussion on this

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting period begins: Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v2

the content is safe. On 19/10/2023 12:43 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: The voting period for this ballot has started. Note that <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fissues%2F462=05%7C01%7CInigo.Barre

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting period begins: Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v2

le link. To do otherwise will likely result in confusion, as members will be unsure on what they’re voting on. Thanks, Corey [1] https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2022-May/000810.html From: Servercert-wg mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Inigo Ba

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting period begins: Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v2

attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 19/10/2023 12:43 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: The voting period for this ballot has started. Note that <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabfo

[Servercert-wg] Voting period begins: Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v2

The voting period for this ballot has started. Note that Inconsistent document formatting (Markdown vs PDF) · Issue #462 · cabforum/servercert (github.com) will be also included (it´s a format issue with no content change). Purpose of Ballot

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v2

Purpose of Ballot SC-66 v2 This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the issues and typos that have happened due to the different updates of the document. No new normative requirements are introduced

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up (voting period)

μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the issues and typos that have happened due to the different updates of the document. Notes: 1

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up (voting period)

This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the issues and typos that have happened due to the different updates of the document. Notes: * The majority of these issues have been documented in

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up (voting period)

This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the issues and typos that have happened due to the different updates of the document. Notes: * The majority of these issues have been documented in

[Servercert-wg] CABF F2F SCWG agenda

Hi all, See attached agenda for tomorrow´s meeting. Regards F2F 60 agenda.pptx Description: MS-Powerpoint 2007 presentation smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Servercert-wg mailing list Servercert-wg@cabforum.org

[Servercert-wg] SCWG Meeting Final Minutes - Sept 14, 2023

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message, prepared by Janet Hines - VikingCloud. Attendance Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt), Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Abhishek Bhat - (eMudhra), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign), Andrea

[Servercert-wg] IPR Review period for SC63: Make OCSP optional, require CRLs, and incenctivize automation

This is to notify the community that the IPR review period for ballot SC63 (Make OCSP Optional, Require CRLs, and Incentivize Automation) has completed. No IPR Exclusion Notices were filed, and the ballot becomes effective as of 17 August 2023. The Baseline Requirements version 2.0.1 has been

[Servercert-wg] SCWG agenda - September 28 11:30 ET

Here is the agenda for the subject call. Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) is scheduled to take minutes Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 28 September 2023 1. Roll Call and Begin Recording (* not needed) 2. Read Note-well (* not needed) 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: *

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up

This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the issues and typos that have happened due to the different updates of the document. Notes: * The majority of these issues have been documented in

Re: [Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SCXX- Fall 2023 Clean-up

Barreira via Servercert-wg Enviado el: miércoles, 13 de septiembre de 2023 13:45 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SCXX- Fall 2023 Clean-up CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open

[Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SCXX- Fall 2023 Clean-up

Hello all, We are looking for feedback on the following draft ballot as well as endorsers. Thank you, Purpose of Ballot SCXX: Fall 2023 Cleanup This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to the

[Servercert-wg] Final Minutes: 2023-08-03 Server Certificate Working Group Teleconference

Final Minutes of the 2023-08-03 Server Certificate Working Group Teleconference Present: * Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt) * Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon) * Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign) * Andrea Holland - (VikingCloud) * Brianca Martin - (Amazon) * Bruce Morton -

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG agenda - thursday 31 August, 2023 at 11:30 EST

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Kiran Tummala (Microsoft) is scheduled to take minutes and next up is Janet Hines (VikingCloud). Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 31 August 2023 1. Roll Call and Begin Recording (* not needed) 2. Read Note-well (* not

Re: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

ight require additional discussion. I hope this helps. Dimitris. On 29/8/2023 12:42 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote: Hi Tim, See attached redlined and current versions. I just used what Martijn suggested yesterday but let me know if this is what you were looking fo

[Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

Hello, The current Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) are written in a non-standardized format. For many years it has been discussed to convert this document into the RFC 3647 format and follow the standardized model for this type of documents. Given that this has been known for several

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of SCWG call 20th July

These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message, prepared by Andrea Holland (VikingCloud). ServerCert WG Meeting: July 20, 2023 Attendance (from WebEx) Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt), Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Abdul Hakeem Putra - (MSC Trustgate

[Servercert-wg] Final SCWG agenda - August 3 11:30 ET

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Jos Purvis (Fastly) is scheduled to take minutes and next up is Kiran Tummala (Microsoft). Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 3 August 2023 1. Roll Call and Begin Recording (* not needed) 2. Read Note-well (* not needed) 3.

[Servercert-wg] Draft SCWG agenda - August 3 11:30 ET

Here is the draft agenda for the subject call. Feel free to add any other topic to be discussed. Server Certificate Working Group Agenda - 3 August 2023 1. Roll Call and Begin Recording (* not needed) 2. Read Note-well (* not needed) 3. Review Agenda 4. Minutes: *

[Servercert-wg] Final minutes of the F2F 59 SCWG meeting on June 8th

Thursday, 8 June 2023 - CA/B Forum Meeting (Day 3) Server Certificate Working Group Meeting Presentation by: Inigo Barreira (Sectigo) Minutes: Tim Callan (Sectigo) Attendance onsite: Ben Wilson (Mozilla), Nitesh Bakliwal (Microsoft), Karina Sirota (Microsoft), Tahmina Ahmad (Microsoft),

  1   2   >