2024 at 12:22
To: Ponds-White, Trev , CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List , Tim Hollebeek
, Christophe Bonjean
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69 Clarify router
and firewall logging requirements
CAUTION: This email originated from outside
Discussion List ; Christophe Bonjean
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69
Clarify router and firewall logging requirements
There are a number of attack scenarios that cause network devices to
crash/restart either as part of the attack, or as a consequence
; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List ; Christophe Bonjean
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69
Clarify router and firewall logging requirements
There are a number of attack scenarios that cause network devices to
crash/restart either
6, 2024 12:59 PM
To: Christophe Bonjean ; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69 Clarify router
and firewall logging requirements
I had the same thought about firewall rules vs configuration changes being
: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 5:39 AM
To: Ponds-White, Trev ; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69
Clarify router and firewall logging requirements
I agree with Trev’s perspective.
A few comments
Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List ; Clint
Wilson
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69 Clarify router
and firewall logging requirements
I think “router and firewall activities” are solutions that don’t identify the
problem we are trying to solve
: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69
Clarify router and firewall logging requirements
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
Hi Clint,
Thanks
terbarg , ServerCert CA/BF
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-69 Clarify router
and firewall logging requirements
Hi Martijn,
Thanks for sending this out for discussion. Just a few comments at this point:
1. I’m not sure the wording "Router and firewall activities
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024, 16:13 Clint Wilson via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:
> Hi Martijn,
>
> Thanks for sending this out for discussion. Just a few comments at this
> point:
>
>
>1. I’m not sure the wording "Router and firewall activities" is
>considered an unspecified
Hi Martijn,
Thanks for sending this out for discussion. Just a few comments at this point:
I’m not sure the wording "Router and firewall activities" is considered an
unspecified term, and leaves the exact definition and scope up to the CA,
however” is necessary or even really helpful. I think
Summary:
This ballot aims to clarify what data needs to be logged as part of the
"Firewall and router activities" logging requirement in the Baseline
Requirements.
This ballot is proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Daniel
Jeffery (Fastly) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
