Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

SwissSign votes yes to Ballot SC-72. Adrian Michael Mueller Product Manager Certificate Services +41 43 811 05 97 adrian.muel...@swisssign.com From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Sent: Friday, March 15,

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

eMudhra votes "yes" to ballot SC-72 From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Date: Friday, 15 March 2024 at 4:01 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Hi, Could the ballot author and endorsers please provide some additional explanation and context surrounding this ballot? As far as I can recall, this topic hasn’t been discussed since SC-062, so it’s rather coming out of nowhere as a ballot proposal (which is, of course, totally fine, but

[Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing the exceptions to policyQualifiers​ in section 9.7, to align them with the Baseline Requirements (BRs).As result, this ballot changes policyQualifiers​ from MUST​ to NOT RECOMMENDED​ as stated in the TLS Baseline