One of the new Interested Party members tried to post to the group but it bounced. I've asked Wayne to look at it but in the meantime, I'm reposting the message for him:
I'd like to start some discussion on the WG's opinions of CAA for Tor hidden services, using my draft-ietf-acme-onion <https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/cNl2iFrs> and my Tor Spec proposal 343-rend-caa <https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/YAae97pn> , as part of the ACME for Onions <https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/wi4TBMXN> project. Specifically: - is this something the WG likes? - should CAA checking be required for Tor? Thanks, Q Misell
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list Servercert-wg@cabforum.org https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
