Re: [Servercert-wg] Compromised/Weak Keys Ballot Proposal

2024-04-12 Thread Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
I've updated https://github.com/wthayer/servercert/pull/1/files as follows to exclude large key sizes: In the case of Debian weak keys vulnerability ( > https://wiki.debian.org/SSLkeys)), the CA SHALL reject all keys found at > https://github.com/cabforum/debian-weak-keys/ for each key type (e.g.

Re: [Servercert-wg] Compromised/Weak Keys Ballot Proposal

2024-04-12 Thread Clint Wilson via Servercert-wg
Hi Wayne, That was indeed my intent, but I’m happy with the proposal either way. Thank you, -Clint > On Apr 12, 2024, at 12:33 PM, Wayne Thayer wrote: > > Thank you Clint and Aaron, this is helpful. Here is what I propose: > >> In the case of Debian weak keys vulnerability >>

Re: [Servercert-wg] Compromised/Weak Keys Ballot Proposal

2024-04-12 Thread Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg
Thank you Clint and Aaron, this is helpful. Here is what I propose: In the case of Debian weak keys vulnerability ([ > https://wiki.debian.org/SSLkeys)]), the CA SHALL reject all keys found at > [https://github.com/cabforum/debian-weak-keys/] for each key type (e.g. > RSA, ECDSA) and size listed