On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:41:23 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> It's not too bad to change the test to launch a LingeredApp and test the
> output, I made an attempt at that. I'll share a testcase suggestion here, see
> what you think.
Thank you for the share! It makes sense to me. This test will start
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:04:28 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> ### Motivation and proposal
>> Hi, heap dump brings about pauses for application's execution(STW), this is
>> a well-known pain. JDK-8252842 have added parallel support to heapdump in an
>> attempt to alleviate this issue. However, all
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:04:28 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> ### Motivation and proposal
>> Hi, heap dump brings about pauses for application's execution(STW), this is
>> a well-known pain. JDK-8252842 have added parallel support to heapdump in an
>> attempt to alleviate this issue. However, all
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 16:31:28 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> new can_parallel_dump
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java line 59:
>
>> 57:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:04:28 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> ### Motivation and proposal
>> Hi, heap dump brings about pauses for application's execution(STW), this is
>> a well-known pain. JDK-8252842 have added parallel support to heapdump in an
>> attempt to alleviate this issue. However, all
> ### Motivation and proposal
> Hi, heap dump brings about pauses for application's execution(STW), this is a
> well-known pain. JDK-8252842 have added parallel support to heapdump in an
> attempt to alleviate this issue. However, all concurrent threads
> competitively write heap data to the
