> follow up 8267941
Lei Zaakjyu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
fix indentation
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18871/files
- new:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:16:03 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
> in CodeCache.
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:48:49 GMT, Dean Long wrote:
>> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
>> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
>> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
>> in CodeCache.
>>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:16:03 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
> in CodeCache.
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:16:03 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
> in CodeCache.
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:16:03 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
> in CodeCache.
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:02:16 GMT, Dean Long wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/code/nmethod.cpp line 117:
>>
>>> 115: result = static_cast(thing); \
>>> 116: assert(static_cast(result) == thing, "failed: %d != %d",
>>> static_cast(result), thing);
>>> 117:
>>
>> I replaced `checked_cast<>()`
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:36:50 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
>> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
>> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
>> in
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:36:41 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Some cleanup related to JvmtiEnvBase::get_threadOop_and_JavaThread method
>>
>> Testing: tier1-6
>
> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp line 1976:
>
>> 1974: oop thread_obj = nullptr;
>> 1975:
>> 1976: jvmtiError err =
>>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:59:43 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Some cleanup related to JvmtiEnvBase::get_threadOop_and_JavaThread method
>
> Testing: tier1-6
src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp line 1976:
> 1974: oop thread_obj = nullptr;
> 1975:
> 1976: jvmtiError err =
>
Some cleanup related to JvmtiEnvBase::get_threadOop_and_JavaThread method
Testing: tier1-6
-
Commit messages:
- fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18986/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk=18986=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330852
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:16:03 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
> `dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
> speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space
> in CodeCache.
Move immutable nmethod's data from CodeCache to C heap. It includes
`dependencies, nul_chk_table, handler_table, scopes_pcs, scopes_data,
speculations, jvmci_data`. It amounts for about 30% (optimized VM) of space in
CodeCache.
Use HotSpot's `os::malloc()` to allocate memory in C heap for
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:45:50 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This is a fix of the following JVMTI scalability issue. A closed benchmark
>> with millions of virtual threads shows 3X-4X overhead when a JVMTI agent has
>> been loaded. For instance, this is observable when an app is executed under
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:04:30 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review the updates to support a proposed new
> `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option.
>
> The work can be thought of as in 3 parts:
>
> 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it
> is possible
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:04:09 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review the updates to support a proposed new
>> `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option.
>>
>> The work can be thought of as in 3 parts:
>>
>> 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it
>> is
> Please review the updates to support a proposed new
> `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option.
>
> The work can be thought of as in 3 parts:
>
> 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it
> is possible to specify the appropriately configured `Lint` object when
> This is a fix of the following JVMTI scalability issue. A closed benchmark
> with millions of virtual threads shows 3X-4X overhead when a JVMTI agent has
> been loaded. For instance, this is observable when an app is executed under
> control of the Oracle Studio `collect` utility.
> For
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:39:03 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> This is a fix of the following JVMTI scalability issue. A closed benchmark
>> with millions of virtual threads shows 3X-4X overhead when a JVMTI agent has
>> been loaded. For instance, this is observable when an app is executed under
>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
