On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 05:44:42 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>>
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err` stack trace.
>
> I've seen similar issue and already
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:49:56 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
>> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
>> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
>> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
>> shown in the
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err` stack trace.
>
> I've seen similar issue and already
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err` stack trace.
>
> I've seen similar issue and already
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:29:52 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err`
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:29:52 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err`
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:05:38 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
>> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
>> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
>> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
>> shown in
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:29:52 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err`
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:29:52 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err`
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:29:52 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err`
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:29:52 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
> The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
> `_target_jt->vthread()`.
> The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as
> shown in the `hs_err`
This is a simple fix of three similar asserts.
The `_target_jt->jvmti_vthread()` has to be used instead of
`_target_jt->vthread()`.
The `_target_jt->vthread()` can be outdated in some specific contexts as shown
in the `hs_err` stack trace.
I've seen similar issue and already fixed it in this
13 matches
Mail list logo
