Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-08 Thread Vasiliy Tolstov
2015-02-07 5:03 GMT+03:00 hujianyang hujiany...@huawei.com: KB/sreadrandreadwrite randwrite local 179957 36262 179933 66752 iSCSI redundancy(3x) 51553 51303 17826 15984 redundancy(4:2) 43166 42775

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-08 Thread hujianyang
On 2015/2/8 19:24, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: 2015-02-07 5:03 GMT+03:00 hujianyang hujiany...@huawei.com mailto:hujiany...@huawei.com: KB/sreadrandreadwrite randwrite local 179957 36262 179933 66752 iSCSI

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-06 Thread hujianyang
On 2015/2/6 16:41, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: At Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:24:21 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: At Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:17:42 +0800, hujianyang wrote: Hi Saeki, On 2015/2/3 16:53, Saeki Masaki wrote: Hi Hu, Since Sheepdog has a mechanism that does not place objects in the same

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-06 Thread Hitoshi Mitake
At Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:24:21 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: At Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:17:42 +0800, hujianyang wrote: Hi Saeki, On 2015/2/3 16:53, Saeki Masaki wrote: Hi Hu, Since Sheepdog has a mechanism that does not place objects in the same zone_id. Can you try to

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-03 Thread Hitoshi Mitake
At Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:02:24 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: Hi Hu, Thanks for your report! At Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:52:12 +0800, hujianyang wrote: Hi Hitoshi, Sorry for disturb. I'm testing redundancy policy of sheepdog via iSCSI. I think if I create a 1G v-disk, the total

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-03 Thread Hitoshi Mitake
Hi Hu, Thanks for your report! At Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:52:12 +0800, hujianyang wrote: Hi Hitoshi, Sorry for disturb. I'm testing redundancy policy of sheepdog via iSCSI. I think if I create a 1G v-disk, the total space cost of this device should be 3*1G under a 3 copies policy. But

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-03 Thread hujianyang
Hi Hitoshi, Thanks for your help! Try to answer your questions. On 2015/2/3 16:02, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: Hmm, seems strange. For diagnosing, I have some questions: 1. Can you see any error messages in log files of sheep? log while performing dd on a formatted filesystem: Feb 04 00:16:05

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-03 Thread hujianyang
On 2015/2/3 17:19, Bastian Scholz wrote: Am 2015-02-03 09:54, schrieb hujianyang: I'm not clear with this. Just run sheep /mnt/store/0 -z 0 -p 7000 on each host. I guess this is your problem. Sheep replicates in different zones, since you have only one zone defined, sheep dont replicate the

Re: [sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-03 Thread hujianyang
Hi Saeki, On 2015/2/3 16:53, Saeki Masaki wrote: Hi Hu, Since Sheepdog has a mechanism that does not place objects in the same zone_id. Can you try to change ZONE id in each node. Id Host:Port V-Nodes Zone 0 130.1.0.147:7000128 0 1

[sheepdog] Redundancy policy via iSCSI

2015-02-02 Thread hujianyang
Hi Hitoshi, Sorry for disturb. I'm testing redundancy policy of sheepdog via iSCSI. I think if I create a 1G v-disk, the total space cost of this device should be 3*1G under a 3 copies policy. But after tests, I find the cost of this device is only 1G. Seems no additional copy is created. I